孕期体力活动问卷简表(PPAQ-SF)的有效性。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae382
Susan Park, Robert Marcotte, John Staudenmayer, John Sirard, Nicole VanKim, Penelope Pekow, Scott Strath, Patty Freedson, Lisa Chasan-Taber
{"title":"孕期体力活动问卷简表(PPAQ-SF)的有效性。","authors":"Susan Park, Robert Marcotte, John Staudenmayer, John Sirard, Nicole VanKim, Penelope Pekow, Scott Strath, Patty Freedson, Lisa Chasan-Taber","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To develop and evaluate the validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (PPAQ-SF). A prospective cohort of participants (N=50) completed the updated PPAQ (long-form) and wore an ActiGraph for 7 days on the nondominant wrist in early, mid, and late pregnancy. The top ten questions with the highest relative contribution to the between-person variance in PPAQ-assessed total MET-hours/day were selected. Internal validity was evaluated using the ActiGraph and the updated PPAQ (long-form) within the current dataset. Validity was also assessed in an external validation dataset of 222 pregnant participants using the updated and original PPAQ (long-forms). Spearman correlations between the PPAQ-SF and ActiGraph estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were r = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for overall pregnancy and ranged from 0.21 (95% CI -0.07-0.47) in early pregnancy to 0.49 (95% CI 0.23-0.69) in mid-pregnancy. In the external validation dataset, correlations between the PPAQ-SF and the PPAQ (long forms) estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were statistically significant across pregnancy (r=0.94-0.99). Reproducibility ranged from 0.35 in early pregnancy to 0.77 in mid pregnancy. In summary, the PPAQ-SF can provide a time-efficient measure of MVPA during pregnancy with acceptable validity; reproducibility was reasonable in mid-pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (PPAQ-SF).\",\"authors\":\"Susan Park, Robert Marcotte, John Staudenmayer, John Sirard, Nicole VanKim, Penelope Pekow, Scott Strath, Patty Freedson, Lisa Chasan-Taber\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwae382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To develop and evaluate the validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (PPAQ-SF). A prospective cohort of participants (N=50) completed the updated PPAQ (long-form) and wore an ActiGraph for 7 days on the nondominant wrist in early, mid, and late pregnancy. The top ten questions with the highest relative contribution to the between-person variance in PPAQ-assessed total MET-hours/day were selected. Internal validity was evaluated using the ActiGraph and the updated PPAQ (long-form) within the current dataset. Validity was also assessed in an external validation dataset of 222 pregnant participants using the updated and original PPAQ (long-forms). Spearman correlations between the PPAQ-SF and ActiGraph estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were r = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for overall pregnancy and ranged from 0.21 (95% CI -0.07-0.47) in early pregnancy to 0.49 (95% CI 0.23-0.69) in mid-pregnancy. In the external validation dataset, correlations between the PPAQ-SF and the PPAQ (long forms) estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were statistically significant across pregnancy (r=0.94-0.99). Reproducibility ranged from 0.35 in early pregnancy to 0.77 in mid pregnancy. In summary, the PPAQ-SF can provide a time-efficient measure of MVPA during pregnancy with acceptable validity; reproducibility was reasonable in mid-pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae382\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开发并评估孕期体力活动问卷-简表(PPAQ-SF)的有效性。前瞻性队列参与者(50 人)在孕早期、孕中期和孕晚期填写了最新的 PPAQ(长表),并在非支配腕上佩戴了 ActiGraph 7 天。我们选出了对 PPAQ 评估的总 MET 小时/天的人际差异贡献最大的前十个问题。在当前数据集中,使用 ActiGraph 和更新的 PPAQ(长表)对内部有效性进行了评估。此外,还使用更新版和原始 PPAQ(长表)对 222 名怀孕参与者的外部验证数据集进行了有效性评估。在整个孕期,PPAQ-SF 和 ActiGraph 估算的 MVPA MET 小时/天之间的斯皮尔曼相关性为 r = 0.34(95% CI 0.18-0.48),孕早期为 0.21(95% CI -0.07-0.47),孕中期为 0.49(95% CI 0.23-0.69)。在外部验证数据集中,PPAQ-SF 和 PPAQ(长表)对 MVPA MET 小时/天的估计值之间的相关性在整个孕期都具有统计学意义(r=0.94-0.99)。再现性从孕早期的 0.35 到孕中期的 0.77 不等。总之,PPAQ-SF 可提供孕期 MVPA 的时间效率测量,其有效性可接受;孕中期的再现性合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (PPAQ-SF).

To develop and evaluate the validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (PPAQ-SF). A prospective cohort of participants (N=50) completed the updated PPAQ (long-form) and wore an ActiGraph for 7 days on the nondominant wrist in early, mid, and late pregnancy. The top ten questions with the highest relative contribution to the between-person variance in PPAQ-assessed total MET-hours/day were selected. Internal validity was evaluated using the ActiGraph and the updated PPAQ (long-form) within the current dataset. Validity was also assessed in an external validation dataset of 222 pregnant participants using the updated and original PPAQ (long-forms). Spearman correlations between the PPAQ-SF and ActiGraph estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were r = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for overall pregnancy and ranged from 0.21 (95% CI -0.07-0.47) in early pregnancy to 0.49 (95% CI 0.23-0.69) in mid-pregnancy. In the external validation dataset, correlations between the PPAQ-SF and the PPAQ (long forms) estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were statistically significant across pregnancy (r=0.94-0.99). Reproducibility ranged from 0.35 in early pregnancy to 0.77 in mid pregnancy. In summary, the PPAQ-SF can provide a time-efficient measure of MVPA during pregnancy with acceptable validity; reproducibility was reasonable in mid-pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
All-Cause Mortality and 1990-1991 Gulf War Service within the Millennium Cohort Study (2001-2021). Using Double Negative Controls to Adjust for Healthy User Bias in a Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Safety Study. Modern Sources of Controls in Case-Control Studies. Editorial consultants 1. Characterizing state-level structural cisheterosexism trajectories using sequence and cluster analysis, 1996-2016, 50 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., and associations with health status and healthcare outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1