Joseph A Lewcun, Naomi Ghahrai, Madeline Donnelly, Annie Luo, Brooks Knighton, Stephanie Shin, Rendell Bernabe, Paschalia Mountziaris
{"title":"被监禁患者群体中的下颌骨骨折结果差异。","authors":"Joseph A Lewcun, Naomi Ghahrai, Madeline Donnelly, Annie Luo, Brooks Knighton, Stephanie Shin, Rendell Bernabe, Paschalia Mountziaris","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inmates represent a vulnerable health care population within the United States, with inconsistent access to surgical specialty care. Facial fractures are common among the incarcerated population, comprising approximately 14% of all traumatic injuries. However, few studies have evaluated facial fracture outcomes in this population. The aim of this study is to identify disparities in mandible fracture outcomes in the incarcerated population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all isolated traumatic mandible fractures at a single academic medical center from 2018 to 2023 was conducted. Mandible fractures were treated by plastic surgery, otolaryngology, or oral and maxillofacial surgery. Outcome measures such as rates of persistent malocclusion, motor deficits, surgical site infection, reoperation, and readmission were compared between inmate and civilian subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 patients (mean age, 33.1 years; 81.5% male) who were treated for isolated traumatic mandible fracture were included. A minority of patients (11.7%; n = 24) were inmates, whereas 88.3% (n = 181) were civilians. The mean time to operative intervention was 10.2 days in the incarcerated group and 4.4 days in the civilian group (P < 0.05). Persistent subjective malocclusion after surgery was noted in 20.8% (n = 5) of incarcerated patients and 7.2% (n = 13) of civilian patients (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in rates of surgical site infection, reoperation, persistent motor deficits, or readmissions within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incarcerated patients with traumatic mandible fractures have increased time to operative intervention and increased rates of subjective malocclusion postoperatively. Increased time to operative intervention may reflect barriers in access to specialty surgical care, which could adversely affect patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandible Fracture Outcome Disparities in the Incarcerated Patient Population.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Lewcun, Naomi Ghahrai, Madeline Donnelly, Annie Luo, Brooks Knighton, Stephanie Shin, Rendell Bernabe, Paschalia Mountziaris\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inmates represent a vulnerable health care population within the United States, with inconsistent access to surgical specialty care. Facial fractures are common among the incarcerated population, comprising approximately 14% of all traumatic injuries. However, few studies have evaluated facial fracture outcomes in this population. The aim of this study is to identify disparities in mandible fracture outcomes in the incarcerated population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all isolated traumatic mandible fractures at a single academic medical center from 2018 to 2023 was conducted. Mandible fractures were treated by plastic surgery, otolaryngology, or oral and maxillofacial surgery. Outcome measures such as rates of persistent malocclusion, motor deficits, surgical site infection, reoperation, and readmission were compared between inmate and civilian subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 patients (mean age, 33.1 years; 81.5% male) who were treated for isolated traumatic mandible fracture were included. A minority of patients (11.7%; n = 24) were inmates, whereas 88.3% (n = 181) were civilians. The mean time to operative intervention was 10.2 days in the incarcerated group and 4.4 days in the civilian group (P < 0.05). Persistent subjective malocclusion after surgery was noted in 20.8% (n = 5) of incarcerated patients and 7.2% (n = 13) of civilian patients (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in rates of surgical site infection, reoperation, persistent motor deficits, or readmissions within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incarcerated patients with traumatic mandible fractures have increased time to operative intervention and increased rates of subjective malocclusion postoperatively. Increased time to operative intervention may reflect barriers in access to specialty surgical care, which could adversely affect patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mandible Fracture Outcome Disparities in the Incarcerated Patient Population.
Introduction: Inmates represent a vulnerable health care population within the United States, with inconsistent access to surgical specialty care. Facial fractures are common among the incarcerated population, comprising approximately 14% of all traumatic injuries. However, few studies have evaluated facial fracture outcomes in this population. The aim of this study is to identify disparities in mandible fracture outcomes in the incarcerated population.
Methods: A retrospective review of all isolated traumatic mandible fractures at a single academic medical center from 2018 to 2023 was conducted. Mandible fractures were treated by plastic surgery, otolaryngology, or oral and maxillofacial surgery. Outcome measures such as rates of persistent malocclusion, motor deficits, surgical site infection, reoperation, and readmission were compared between inmate and civilian subgroups.
Results: A total of 205 patients (mean age, 33.1 years; 81.5% male) who were treated for isolated traumatic mandible fracture were included. A minority of patients (11.7%; n = 24) were inmates, whereas 88.3% (n = 181) were civilians. The mean time to operative intervention was 10.2 days in the incarcerated group and 4.4 days in the civilian group (P < 0.05). Persistent subjective malocclusion after surgery was noted in 20.8% (n = 5) of incarcerated patients and 7.2% (n = 13) of civilian patients (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in rates of surgical site infection, reoperation, persistent motor deficits, or readmissions within 30 days.
Conclusions: Incarcerated patients with traumatic mandible fractures have increased time to operative intervention and increased rates of subjective malocclusion postoperatively. Increased time to operative intervention may reflect barriers in access to specialty surgical care, which could adversely affect patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.