验光师与眼科医生进行选择性激光小梁成形术的疗效比较:英国一项多中心观察研究。

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001870
Chan Ning Lee, Alexander Delaney, Jay A L Richardson, Graham Freeman, Patrick J G Gunn, Stephen Harthan, Vincent Dubois, Kenneth Yau, Christopher Hemmerdinger, Robert Harper, Neeru A Vallabh
{"title":"验光师与眼科医生进行选择性激光小梁成形术的疗效比较:英国一项多中心观察研究。","authors":"Chan Ning Lee, Alexander Delaney, Jay A L Richardson, Graham Freeman, Patrick J G Gunn, Stephen Harthan, Vincent Dubois, Kenneth Yau, Christopher Hemmerdinger, Robert Harper, Neeru A Vallabh","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), a National Institute for Care and Health Excellence recommended first-line treatment for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, is increasingly delivered by optometrists. This retrospective multicentre observational study evaluates real-world outcomes of SLT comparing optometrist-treated to ophthalmologist-treated eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults aged ≥40 years receiving first SLT treatment at three UK hospital eye units (Aintree, Manchester, Macclesfield) between 1 August 2018 and 1 August 2021 were analysed using anonymised local audit data. Outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), drop burden, complications including post-SLT IOP spikes, and composite treatment failures including repeat laser or glaucoma surgery, evaluated at 6-monthly intervals up to 24 months. Groups were compared with parametric and non-parametric tests, accounting for intereye correlation, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using composite treatment failure endpoints was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>207 eyes (131 patients) were analysed, 84 (56 patients) optometrist-treated eyes compared with 123 ophthalmologist-treated eyes (75 patients). No statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found in change in VA, IOP or glaucoma drops from pre-SLT baseline between optometrist and ophthalmologist-treated eyes, at all time points. More cataracts were detected in optometrist-treated eyes, however, this did not affect differences in VA or cataract surgery frequency. More optometrist-treated eyes underwent glaucoma surgery, however, ophthalmologist-treated eyes had higher drop burden and chance of composite treatment failure up to month 18.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes of SLT treatment by optometrists and ophthalmologists are comparable up to 24 months post-treatment. Ophthalmologist-treated eyes may have had more aggressive eye-drop treatment, preventing the need for surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty delivered by optometrists compared with ophthalmologists: a UK-based multicentre observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Chan Ning Lee, Alexander Delaney, Jay A L Richardson, Graham Freeman, Patrick J G Gunn, Stephen Harthan, Vincent Dubois, Kenneth Yau, Christopher Hemmerdinger, Robert Harper, Neeru A Vallabh\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), a National Institute for Care and Health Excellence recommended first-line treatment for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, is increasingly delivered by optometrists. This retrospective multicentre observational study evaluates real-world outcomes of SLT comparing optometrist-treated to ophthalmologist-treated eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults aged ≥40 years receiving first SLT treatment at three UK hospital eye units (Aintree, Manchester, Macclesfield) between 1 August 2018 and 1 August 2021 were analysed using anonymised local audit data. Outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), drop burden, complications including post-SLT IOP spikes, and composite treatment failures including repeat laser or glaucoma surgery, evaluated at 6-monthly intervals up to 24 months. Groups were compared with parametric and non-parametric tests, accounting for intereye correlation, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using composite treatment failure endpoints was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>207 eyes (131 patients) were analysed, 84 (56 patients) optometrist-treated eyes compared with 123 ophthalmologist-treated eyes (75 patients). No statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found in change in VA, IOP or glaucoma drops from pre-SLT baseline between optometrist and ophthalmologist-treated eyes, at all time points. More cataracts were detected in optometrist-treated eyes, however, this did not affect differences in VA or cataract surgery frequency. More optometrist-treated eyes underwent glaucoma surgery, however, ophthalmologist-treated eyes had higher drop burden and chance of composite treatment failure up to month 18.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes of SLT treatment by optometrists and ophthalmologists are comparable up to 24 months post-treatment. Ophthalmologist-treated eyes may have had more aggressive eye-drop treatment, preventing the need for surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)是美国国家护理与健康优化研究所推荐的开角型青光眼和眼压过高的一线治疗方法,目前越来越多地由验光师实施。这项回顾性多中心观察研究对视光师治疗与眼科医生治疗的实际效果进行了比较评估:使用匿名的当地审计数据,对2018年8月1日至2021年8月1日期间在英国三家医院眼科(安特里、曼彻斯特、麦克尔斯菲尔德)接受首次SLT治疗的≥40岁成人进行分析。结果包括眼压(IOP)、视力(VA)、眼药水负担、并发症(包括SLT后眼压飙升)以及复合治疗失败(包括重复激光或青光眼手术),每6个月评估一次,直至24个月。在考虑眼内相关性的情况下,采用参数和非参数检验对各组进行了比较,并使用综合治疗失败终点进行了卡普兰-米尔生存分析。在所有时间点上,验光师和眼科医生治疗的眼睛的视力、眼压或青光眼滴眼液与 SLT 前基线相比的变化均无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。在验光师治疗的眼睛中,发现了更多的白内障,但这并不影响视力或白内障手术频率的差异。更多接受验光师治疗的眼睛接受了青光眼手术,但眼科医生治疗的眼睛有更高的眼压下降负担,在第18个月前出现复合治疗失败的几率也更高:结论:由验光师和眼科医生进行的SLT治疗在治疗后24个月内效果相当。接受眼科医生治疗的眼睛可能接受了更积极的滴眼治疗,从而避免了手术的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty delivered by optometrists compared with ophthalmologists: a UK-based multicentre observational study.

Background: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), a National Institute for Care and Health Excellence recommended first-line treatment for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, is increasingly delivered by optometrists. This retrospective multicentre observational study evaluates real-world outcomes of SLT comparing optometrist-treated to ophthalmologist-treated eyes.

Methods: Adults aged ≥40 years receiving first SLT treatment at three UK hospital eye units (Aintree, Manchester, Macclesfield) between 1 August 2018 and 1 August 2021 were analysed using anonymised local audit data. Outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), drop burden, complications including post-SLT IOP spikes, and composite treatment failures including repeat laser or glaucoma surgery, evaluated at 6-monthly intervals up to 24 months. Groups were compared with parametric and non-parametric tests, accounting for intereye correlation, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using composite treatment failure endpoints was conducted.

Results: 207 eyes (131 patients) were analysed, 84 (56 patients) optometrist-treated eyes compared with 123 ophthalmologist-treated eyes (75 patients). No statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found in change in VA, IOP or glaucoma drops from pre-SLT baseline between optometrist and ophthalmologist-treated eyes, at all time points. More cataracts were detected in optometrist-treated eyes, however, this did not affect differences in VA or cataract surgery frequency. More optometrist-treated eyes underwent glaucoma surgery, however, ophthalmologist-treated eyes had higher drop burden and chance of composite treatment failure up to month 18.

Conclusion: Outcomes of SLT treatment by optometrists and ophthalmologists are comparable up to 24 months post-treatment. Ophthalmologist-treated eyes may have had more aggressive eye-drop treatment, preventing the need for surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of choroidal vascular alterations in eyes with myopia using ultrawidefield optical coherence tomography angiography. Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence in age-related macular degeneration. Network-based hub biomarker discovery for glaucoma. Investigating the effects of simulated high altitude on colour discrimination. Total retinal thickness is an important factor in evaluating diabetic retinal neurodegeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1