托法替尼治疗法国中重度类风湿关节炎的成本效益:多状态马尔可夫模型分析。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Clinical and experimental rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-10-03
Joey Fournier, Bastien Boussat, Benoit Dervaux, Philippe Gaudin, Xavier Romand
{"title":"托法替尼治疗法国中重度类风湿关节炎的成本效益:多状态马尔可夫模型分析。","authors":"Joey Fournier, Bastien Boussat, Benoit Dervaux, Philippe Gaudin, Xavier Romand","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing tofacitinib in second-line therapies after methotrexate failure for rheumatoid arthritis in France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a Markov model, we simulated a cohort of 10,000 patients based on literature data to compare various treatment strategies. The reference strategy included the four classes of biologics commonly used in France (TNFi, tocilizumab, abatacept, rituximab). The trial strategies additionally included tofacitinib at different introduction positions. The cycle duration was set at 6 months, and the time horizon was a lifetime. The data for severe adverse effects were sourced from the ORAL Surveillance study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the reference strategy, introducing tofacitinib is a dominant strategy, regardless of its introduction position. Introducing it as the first-line treatment results in the greatest cost savings (€1,679 per patient) while increasing quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.29. According to the one-way sensitivity analysis, the discount rate and the cost of TNFi were the two variables that most influenced costs, while the change in HAQ score and the discount rate were the two variables that most influenced QALYs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study represents the first assessment of the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib in France and incorporates the latest adverse effects reported in the literature. It reinforces previously obtained results from other countries. Our study has some limitations, mainly related to the use of data from clinical trials. Our analysis is limited to severe adverse effects, and their cost is extrapolated from the average hospitalisation cost. The estimated costs are therefore underestimated for chronic diseases such as cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-utility of tofacitinib in the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in France: a multi-state Markov model analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Joey Fournier, Bastien Boussat, Benoit Dervaux, Philippe Gaudin, Xavier Romand\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing tofacitinib in second-line therapies after methotrexate failure for rheumatoid arthritis in France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a Markov model, we simulated a cohort of 10,000 patients based on literature data to compare various treatment strategies. The reference strategy included the four classes of biologics commonly used in France (TNFi, tocilizumab, abatacept, rituximab). The trial strategies additionally included tofacitinib at different introduction positions. The cycle duration was set at 6 months, and the time horizon was a lifetime. The data for severe adverse effects were sourced from the ORAL Surveillance study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the reference strategy, introducing tofacitinib is a dominant strategy, regardless of its introduction position. Introducing it as the first-line treatment results in the greatest cost savings (€1,679 per patient) while increasing quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.29. According to the one-way sensitivity analysis, the discount rate and the cost of TNFi were the two variables that most influenced costs, while the change in HAQ score and the discount rate were the two variables that most influenced QALYs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study represents the first assessment of the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib in France and incorporates the latest adverse effects reported in the literature. It reinforces previously obtained results from other countries. Our study has some limitations, mainly related to the use of data from clinical trials. Our analysis is limited to severe adverse effects, and their cost is extrapolated from the average hospitalisation cost. The estimated costs are therefore underestimated for chronic diseases such as cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估在法国类风湿性关节炎患者甲氨蝶呤治疗失败后将托法替尼引入二线疗法的成本效益:我们使用马尔可夫模型,以文献数据为基础,模拟了10,000名患者,对各种治疗策略进行了比较。参考策略包括法国常用的四类生物制剂(TNFi、托西珠单抗、阿巴他赛普、利妥昔单抗)。试验策略还包括不同导入位置的托法替尼。周期设定为 6 个月,时间跨度为终生。严重不良反应数据来自ORAL监测研究:结果:与参考策略相比,无论引入位置如何,引入托法替尼都是一种主要策略。将其作为一线治疗方案可节省最大成本(每位患者1,679欧元),同时将质量调整生命年(QALYs)提高0.29。根据单向敏感性分析,贴现率和 TNFi 成本是对成本影响最大的两个变量,而 HAQ 评分变化和贴现率则是对 QALYs 影响最大的两个变量:我们的研究首次评估了托法替尼在法国的成本效益,并纳入了文献报道的最新不良反应。它巩固了之前从其他国家获得的结果。我们的研究存在一些局限性,主要与使用临床试验数据有关。我们的分析仅限于严重不良反应,其成本是根据平均住院费用推算出来的。因此,癌症等慢性病的估计成本被低估了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-utility of tofacitinib in the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in France: a multi-state Markov model analysis.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing tofacitinib in second-line therapies after methotrexate failure for rheumatoid arthritis in France.

Methods: Using a Markov model, we simulated a cohort of 10,000 patients based on literature data to compare various treatment strategies. The reference strategy included the four classes of biologics commonly used in France (TNFi, tocilizumab, abatacept, rituximab). The trial strategies additionally included tofacitinib at different introduction positions. The cycle duration was set at 6 months, and the time horizon was a lifetime. The data for severe adverse effects were sourced from the ORAL Surveillance study.

Results: Compared to the reference strategy, introducing tofacitinib is a dominant strategy, regardless of its introduction position. Introducing it as the first-line treatment results in the greatest cost savings (€1,679 per patient) while increasing quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.29. According to the one-way sensitivity analysis, the discount rate and the cost of TNFi were the two variables that most influenced costs, while the change in HAQ score and the discount rate were the two variables that most influenced QALYs.

Conclusions: Our study represents the first assessment of the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib in France and incorporates the latest adverse effects reported in the literature. It reinforces previously obtained results from other countries. Our study has some limitations, mainly related to the use of data from clinical trials. Our analysis is limited to severe adverse effects, and their cost is extrapolated from the average hospitalisation cost. The estimated costs are therefore underestimated for chronic diseases such as cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
期刊最新文献
A charter to improve care for systemic lupus erythematosus. Comment on: Red blood cell distribution width as a surrogate biomarker of damage and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Extensive bone infarcts in an asymptomatic patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Reply: Red blood cell distribution in systemic lupus erythematosus and other inflammatory diseases. Ultrasound for day-to-day clinical use: construction of a simple discriminator between healthy skin and thickened systemic sclerosis skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1