为更好地治愈脓肿分枝杆菌肺病而努力。

IF 19 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Clinical Microbiology Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1128/cmr.00080-23
Véronique Dartois, Thomas Dick
{"title":"为更好地治愈脓肿分枝杆菌肺病而努力。","authors":"Véronique Dartois, Thomas Dick","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00080-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYThe opportunistic pathogen <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (Mab) causes fatal lung infections that bear similarities-and notable differences-with tuberculosis (TB) pulmonary disease. In contrast to TB, no antibiotic is formally approved to treat Mab disease, there is no reliable cure, and the discovery and development pipeline is incredibly thin. Here, we discuss the factors behind the unsatisfactory cure rates of Mab disease, namely intrinsic resistance and persistence of the pathogen, and the use of underperforming, often parenteral and toxic, repurposed drugs. We propose preclinical strategies to build injectable-free sterilizing and safe regimens: (i) prioritize oral bactericidal antibiotic classes, with an initial focus on approved agents or advanced clinical candidates to provide immediate options for desperate patients, (ii) test drug combinations early, (iii) optimize novel leads specifically for <i>M. abscessus</i>, and (iv) consider pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets at the site of disease, the lung lesions in which drug tolerant bacterial populations reside. Knowledge and tool gaps in the preclinical drug discovery process are identified, including validated mouse models and computational platforms to enable <i>in vitro</i> mouse-human translation. We briefly discuss recent advances in clinical development, the need for readouts and biomarkers that correlate with cure, and clinical trial concepts adapted to the uniqueness of Mab patient populations for new regimen development. In an era when most pharmaceutical firms have withdrawn from antimicrobial drug discovery, the breakthroughs needed to fill the regimen development pipeline will likely come from partnerships between academia, biotech, pharma, non-profit organizations, and governments, with incentives that reward cooperation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0008023"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward better cures for <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> lung disease.\",\"authors\":\"Véronique Dartois, Thomas Dick\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/cmr.00080-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>SUMMARYThe opportunistic pathogen <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (Mab) causes fatal lung infections that bear similarities-and notable differences-with tuberculosis (TB) pulmonary disease. In contrast to TB, no antibiotic is formally approved to treat Mab disease, there is no reliable cure, and the discovery and development pipeline is incredibly thin. Here, we discuss the factors behind the unsatisfactory cure rates of Mab disease, namely intrinsic resistance and persistence of the pathogen, and the use of underperforming, often parenteral and toxic, repurposed drugs. We propose preclinical strategies to build injectable-free sterilizing and safe regimens: (i) prioritize oral bactericidal antibiotic classes, with an initial focus on approved agents or advanced clinical candidates to provide immediate options for desperate patients, (ii) test drug combinations early, (iii) optimize novel leads specifically for <i>M. abscessus</i>, and (iv) consider pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets at the site of disease, the lung lesions in which drug tolerant bacterial populations reside. Knowledge and tool gaps in the preclinical drug discovery process are identified, including validated mouse models and computational platforms to enable <i>in vitro</i> mouse-human translation. We briefly discuss recent advances in clinical development, the need for readouts and biomarkers that correlate with cure, and clinical trial concepts adapted to the uniqueness of Mab patient populations for new regimen development. In an era when most pharmaceutical firms have withdrawn from antimicrobial drug discovery, the breakthroughs needed to fill the regimen development pipeline will likely come from partnerships between academia, biotech, pharma, non-profit organizations, and governments, with incentives that reward cooperation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0008023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00080-23\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00080-23","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要机会性病原体脓肿分枝杆菌(Mab)会导致致命的肺部感染,与肺结核(TB)有相似之处,也有明显的不同之处。与肺结核不同的是,没有一种抗生素被正式批准用于治疗脓肿分枝杆菌病,也没有可靠的治愈方法,而且发现和开发的渠道非常稀少。在此,我们讨论了马布病治愈率不尽人意背后的因素,即病原体的内在抗药性和持久性,以及使用性能不佳、通常是肠外和有毒的再用途药物。我们提出了建立免注射灭菌安全方案的临床前策略:(i) 优先考虑口服杀菌抗生素类别,最初重点关注已获批准的药物或先进的临床候选药物,以便为绝望的患者提供直接选择;(ii) 尽早测试药物组合;(iii) 优化专门针对脓毒症马勃菌的新型先导药物;(iv) 考虑发病部位的药代动力学-药效学目标,即耐药细菌群栖息的肺部病变部位。我们确定了临床前药物发现过程中的知识和工具缺口,包括验证小鼠模型和计算平台,以实现体外小鼠-人体转化。我们简要讨论了临床开发的最新进展、对与治愈相关的读数和生物标志物的需求,以及适应马布病患者群体独特性的临床试验概念,以开发新的治疗方案。在大多数制药公司已退出抗菌药物研发的时代,填补新药研发管道所需的突破很可能来自学术界、生物技术公司、制药公司、非营利组织和政府之间的合作,以及奖励合作的激励机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward better cures for Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease.

SUMMARYThe opportunistic pathogen Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) causes fatal lung infections that bear similarities-and notable differences-with tuberculosis (TB) pulmonary disease. In contrast to TB, no antibiotic is formally approved to treat Mab disease, there is no reliable cure, and the discovery and development pipeline is incredibly thin. Here, we discuss the factors behind the unsatisfactory cure rates of Mab disease, namely intrinsic resistance and persistence of the pathogen, and the use of underperforming, often parenteral and toxic, repurposed drugs. We propose preclinical strategies to build injectable-free sterilizing and safe regimens: (i) prioritize oral bactericidal antibiotic classes, with an initial focus on approved agents or advanced clinical candidates to provide immediate options for desperate patients, (ii) test drug combinations early, (iii) optimize novel leads specifically for M. abscessus, and (iv) consider pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets at the site of disease, the lung lesions in which drug tolerant bacterial populations reside. Knowledge and tool gaps in the preclinical drug discovery process are identified, including validated mouse models and computational platforms to enable in vitro mouse-human translation. We briefly discuss recent advances in clinical development, the need for readouts and biomarkers that correlate with cure, and clinical trial concepts adapted to the uniqueness of Mab patient populations for new regimen development. In an era when most pharmaceutical firms have withdrawn from antimicrobial drug discovery, the breakthroughs needed to fill the regimen development pipeline will likely come from partnerships between academia, biotech, pharma, non-profit organizations, and governments, with incentives that reward cooperation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Clinical Microbiology Reviews 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
54.20
自引率
0.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology Reviews (CMR) is a journal that primarily focuses on clinical microbiology and immunology.It aims to provide readers with up-to-date information on the latest developments in these fields.CMR also presents the current state of knowledge in clinical microbiology and immunology.Additionally, the journal offers balanced and thought-provoking perspectives on controversial issues in these areas.
期刊最新文献
The challenges of difficult-to-treat Acinetobacter infections. Laboratory detection of carbapenemases among Gram-negative organisms Animal models for exploring Chagas disease pathogenesis and supporting drug discovery Enriching the future of public health microbiology with hybridization bait capture American Society for Microbiology evidence-based laboratory medicine practice guidelines to reduce blood culture contamination rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1