对 YouTube 上腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术视频中手术内容的评估。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.038
Harika Yumru Celiksoy , Sultan Can
{"title":"对 YouTube 上腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术视频中手术内容的评估。","authors":"Harika Yumru Celiksoy ,&nbsp;Sultan Can","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the quality of surgical content in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) videos on YouTube.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>On February 20, 2024, a search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword “laparoscopic radical hysterectomy,” filtering videos with durations over 20 min and sorting by relevance. Two experienced gynecologists assessed the first 250 videos retrieved to determine if they illustrated anatomical landmarks and surgical procedures in a standardized step-by-step manner.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty videos met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Sixty percent (24 out of 40) of these videos presented the complete list of predetermined surgical steps. According to the LAP-VEGaS assessment tool, only 32.5 % (13 out of 40) of the videos achieved a total score of 11 or higher, and 12.5 % (5 out of 40) scored 12 or higher. Videos with a LAP-VEGaS score of 11 or above had a statistically higher number of views per day (4.64 [IQR: 10.47]) compared to those with a lower score (1.48 [IQR: 3.40], p = 0.019). Additionally, videos featuring a didactic voice were significantly more popular, with higher views per day compared to those with music or no audio (8.66 [IQR: 32.75] vs. 1.69 [IQR: 3.12], p = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The majority of LRH videos on YouTube lacked comprehensive surgical content and received low LAP-VEGaS scores. Videos with a didactic voice and higher LAP-VEGaS scores tended to attract more viewers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"302 ","pages":"Pages 301-305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evaluation of surgical content in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy videos on YouTube\",\"authors\":\"Harika Yumru Celiksoy ,&nbsp;Sultan Can\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the quality of surgical content in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) videos on YouTube.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>On February 20, 2024, a search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword “laparoscopic radical hysterectomy,” filtering videos with durations over 20 min and sorting by relevance. Two experienced gynecologists assessed the first 250 videos retrieved to determine if they illustrated anatomical landmarks and surgical procedures in a standardized step-by-step manner.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty videos met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Sixty percent (24 out of 40) of these videos presented the complete list of predetermined surgical steps. According to the LAP-VEGaS assessment tool, only 32.5 % (13 out of 40) of the videos achieved a total score of 11 or higher, and 12.5 % (5 out of 40) scored 12 or higher. Videos with a LAP-VEGaS score of 11 or above had a statistically higher number of views per day (4.64 [IQR: 10.47]) compared to those with a lower score (1.48 [IQR: 3.40], p = 0.019). Additionally, videos featuring a didactic voice were significantly more popular, with higher views per day compared to those with music or no audio (8.66 [IQR: 32.75] vs. 1.69 [IQR: 3.12], p = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The majority of LRH videos on YouTube lacked comprehensive surgical content and received low LAP-VEGaS scores. Videos with a didactic voice and higher LAP-VEGaS scores tended to attract more viewers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"volume\":\"302 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 301-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005323\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估YouTube上腹腔镜子宫根治术(LRH)视频的手术内容质量:研究设计:2024 年 2 月 20 日,使用关键词 "腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术 "在 YouTube 上进行搜索,筛选时间超过 20 分钟的视频,并按相关性排序。两位经验丰富的妇科医生对检索到的前 250 个视频进行了评估,以确定这些视频是否以标准化的步骤说明了解剖标志和手术过程:结果:40 个视频符合纳入分析的标准。其中 60% 的视频(40 个中的 24 个)展示了完整的预定手术步骤列表。根据 LAP-VEGaS 评估工具,只有 32.5% 的视频(40 个中有 13 个)总分达到或超过 11 分,12.5% 的视频(40 个中有 5 个)总分达到或超过 12 分。与得分较低的视频(1.48 [IQR: 3.40],p = 0.019)相比,LAP-VEGaS 得分达到或超过 11 分的视频每天的观看次数(4.64 [IQR:10.47])要高出很多。此外,与有音乐或无音频的视频相比,有说教声音的视频明显更受欢迎,日浏览量更高(8.66 [IQR: 32.75] vs. 1.69 [IQR: 3.12],p = 0.001):YouTube上的大多数LRH视频缺乏全面的手术内容,LAP-VEGaS得分较低。声音具有说教性且 LAP-VEGaS 分数较高的视频往往能吸引更多观众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The evaluation of surgical content in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy videos on YouTube

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of surgical content in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) videos on YouTube.

Study Design

On February 20, 2024, a search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword “laparoscopic radical hysterectomy,” filtering videos with durations over 20 min and sorting by relevance. Two experienced gynecologists assessed the first 250 videos retrieved to determine if they illustrated anatomical landmarks and surgical procedures in a standardized step-by-step manner.

Results

Forty videos met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Sixty percent (24 out of 40) of these videos presented the complete list of predetermined surgical steps. According to the LAP-VEGaS assessment tool, only 32.5 % (13 out of 40) of the videos achieved a total score of 11 or higher, and 12.5 % (5 out of 40) scored 12 or higher. Videos with a LAP-VEGaS score of 11 or above had a statistically higher number of views per day (4.64 [IQR: 10.47]) compared to those with a lower score (1.48 [IQR: 3.40], p = 0.019). Additionally, videos featuring a didactic voice were significantly more popular, with higher views per day compared to those with music or no audio (8.66 [IQR: 32.75] vs. 1.69 [IQR: 3.12], p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The majority of LRH videos on YouTube lacked comprehensive surgical content and received low LAP-VEGaS scores. Videos with a didactic voice and higher LAP-VEGaS scores tended to attract more viewers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Maternal and perinatal outcomes following code red cesarean delivery performed among hospitals with different level of care. Case-control study of clotting differences using ROTEM testing in pregnant patients with early vaginal bleeding. Corrigendum to "Mode of delivery predicts postpartum maternal leukocyte telomere length" [Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 300 (2024) 224-229]. Corrigendum to “Recombinant-Luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GnRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 283 (2023) 43–48] Comparative study on the effects of combined oral contraceptives and dienogest in women with endometriosis‑associated chronic pelvic pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1