环形微创手术 (CMIS) 矫正成人脊柱畸形后冠状位错位的发生率和临床影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1177/21925682241290759
Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Babak Khandehroo, Worawat Limthongkul, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Neel Anand
{"title":"环形微创手术 (CMIS) 矫正成人脊柱畸形后冠状位错位的发生率和临床影响。","authors":"Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Babak Khandehroo, Worawat Limthongkul, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Neel Anand","doi":"10.1177/21925682241290759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine prevalence and clinical importance of patients who had postoperative CM after CMIS for ASD correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed patients who underwent CMIS technique. Inclusion criteria were patients who were diagnosed with ASD, which is defined as having at least one of the following: coronal Cobb angle >20, SVA >50 mm, PI-LL >10, PT >20. They underwent >4 spinal levels fusion with CMIS technique and had at least 1-year follow-up. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative radiographs and clinical outcome measures (VAS, ODI, and SRS-22 scores) were used to make the comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>120 patients were included. Radiographic outcomes, including CVA, coronal Cobb angle, LSF curve, SVA, LL, and PI-LL, and clinical outcomes, were significantly improved postoperatively in each of the 3 preoperative subgroups (Bao type A, B, and C). At 1-year post-operation, 10 patients (12.4 %) of type A turned out to be CM, 4 patients (21.1%) of type B, and 8 patients (40%) of type C remained CM. Comparing coronally aligned (CA) to coronally mal-aligned patients at 1-year follow-up in each coronal subtype revealed that clinical and radiographic outcomes were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMIS technique significantly improves radiographic and clinical outcomes for ASD patients. Incidence rates of postoperative CM were similar to open surgery. Type C patients were at risk of postoperative CM than types A and B. However, most 1-year outcomes were not significantly different between postoperative CA and CM patients regardless of the preoperative coronal alignment characteristics except ODI scores in type A.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.\",\"authors\":\"Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Babak Khandehroo, Worawat Limthongkul, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Neel Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241290759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine prevalence and clinical importance of patients who had postoperative CM after CMIS for ASD correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed patients who underwent CMIS technique. Inclusion criteria were patients who were diagnosed with ASD, which is defined as having at least one of the following: coronal Cobb angle >20, SVA >50 mm, PI-LL >10, PT >20. They underwent >4 spinal levels fusion with CMIS technique and had at least 1-year follow-up. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative radiographs and clinical outcome measures (VAS, ODI, and SRS-22 scores) were used to make the comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>120 patients were included. Radiographic outcomes, including CVA, coronal Cobb angle, LSF curve, SVA, LL, and PI-LL, and clinical outcomes, were significantly improved postoperatively in each of the 3 preoperative subgroups (Bao type A, B, and C). At 1-year post-operation, 10 patients (12.4 %) of type A turned out to be CM, 4 patients (21.1%) of type B, and 8 patients (40%) of type C remained CM. Comparing coronally aligned (CA) to coronally mal-aligned patients at 1-year follow-up in each coronal subtype revealed that clinical and radiographic outcomes were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMIS technique significantly improves radiographic and clinical outcomes for ASD patients. Incidence rates of postoperative CM were similar to open surgery. Type C patients were at risk of postoperative CM than types A and B. However, most 1-year outcomes were not significantly different between postoperative CA and CM patients regardless of the preoperative coronal alignment characteristics except ODI scores in type A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241290759\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241290759","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计目的:确定ASD矫正术后CMIS术后CM患者的患病率和临床重要性:方法:我们回顾了接受 CMIS 技术的患者:我们回顾了接受CMIS技术的患者。纳入标准:被诊断为ASD的患者,其定义为至少有以下一项:冠状面Cobb角>20,SVA>50 mm,PI-LL>10,PT>20。他们接受了 >4 个脊柱水平的 CMIS 技术融合术,并接受了至少 1 年的随访。比较采用术前和术后1年的X光片以及临床结果测量(VAS、ODI和SRS-22评分):结果:共纳入 120 名患者。包括CVA、冠状面Cobb角、LSF曲线、SVA、LL和PI-LL在内的放射学结果和临床结果在术前的3个亚组(鲍氏A型、B型和C型)中均有显著改善。术后 1 年,10 名 A 型患者(12.4%)仍为 CM,4 名 B 型患者(21.1%)和 8 名 C 型患者(40%)仍为 CM。比较冠状位对齐(CA)和冠状位错位患者在每种冠状位亚型中一年的随访结果,发现临床和放射学结果相当:结论:CMIS技术能明显改善ASD患者的影像学和临床疗效。术后CM的发生率与开放手术相似。然而,除了A型患者的ODI评分外,大多数CA和CM患者的术后1年预后与术前冠状位排列特征无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Objectives: To determine prevalence and clinical importance of patients who had postoperative CM after CMIS for ASD correction.

Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent CMIS technique. Inclusion criteria were patients who were diagnosed with ASD, which is defined as having at least one of the following: coronal Cobb angle >20, SVA >50 mm, PI-LL >10, PT >20. They underwent >4 spinal levels fusion with CMIS technique and had at least 1-year follow-up. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative radiographs and clinical outcome measures (VAS, ODI, and SRS-22 scores) were used to make the comparisons.

Results: 120 patients were included. Radiographic outcomes, including CVA, coronal Cobb angle, LSF curve, SVA, LL, and PI-LL, and clinical outcomes, were significantly improved postoperatively in each of the 3 preoperative subgroups (Bao type A, B, and C). At 1-year post-operation, 10 patients (12.4 %) of type A turned out to be CM, 4 patients (21.1%) of type B, and 8 patients (40%) of type C remained CM. Comparing coronally aligned (CA) to coronally mal-aligned patients at 1-year follow-up in each coronal subtype revealed that clinical and radiographic outcomes were comparable.

Conclusions: CMIS technique significantly improves radiographic and clinical outcomes for ASD patients. Incidence rates of postoperative CM were similar to open surgery. Type C patients were at risk of postoperative CM than types A and B. However, most 1-year outcomes were not significantly different between postoperative CA and CM patients regardless of the preoperative coronal alignment characteristics except ODI scores in type A.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary. Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients. The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization. Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1