评估氨甲环酸口服液、改良克利格曼配方和安慰剂药膏对黄褐斑疗效的随机研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Indian Dermatology Online Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.4103/idoj.idoj_797_23
S Prathyoosha, K Ananditha, T Narayana Rao, K V T Gopal, P V Krishnam Raju
{"title":"评估氨甲环酸口服液、改良克利格曼配方和安慰剂药膏对黄褐斑疗效的随机研究。","authors":"S Prathyoosha, K Ananditha, T Narayana Rao, K V T Gopal, P V Krishnam Raju","doi":"10.4103/idoj.idoj_797_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the availability of various treatment modalities, the treatment of melasma is often incomplete, with a high recurrence rate. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA), modified Kligman's formula (MKF), and a placebo cream in melasma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety cases of melasma of both sexes were enrolled, and divided into three groups of 30 patients each. The baseline severity of melasma was graded by Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) score. Group A, B, and C patients were treated with oral TXA 250 mg twice daily, daily MKF cream at night, and daily placebo cream at night, respectively, for 12 weeks. Improvement in MASI score was calculated after 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, adverse effects, if any, were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on intention to treat analysis, at the end of 12 weeks, the reduction in MASI score in oral TXA, MKF, and placebo groups was 9.94(65.91%), 6.12(54.78%), and 2.07(17.22%), respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.00). The difference in reduction of mean MASI scores after 12 weeks between oral TXA group and MKF group was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.29). The efficacy of oral TXA and MKB was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (<i>P</i> = 0.01 and <i>P</i> = 0.03, respectively). Adverse effects in all groups were mild and self-limiting.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A limited sample size, non-blinded design, and absence of dermoscopic evaluation were the study limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In view of its excellent safety profile, oral TXA may be considered as a better option for moderate to severe melasma.</p>","PeriodicalId":13335,"journal":{"name":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Oral Tranexamic Acid, Modified Kligman's Formula, and Placebo Cream in Melasma.\",\"authors\":\"S Prathyoosha, K Ananditha, T Narayana Rao, K V T Gopal, P V Krishnam Raju\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/idoj.idoj_797_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the availability of various treatment modalities, the treatment of melasma is often incomplete, with a high recurrence rate. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA), modified Kligman's formula (MKF), and a placebo cream in melasma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety cases of melasma of both sexes were enrolled, and divided into three groups of 30 patients each. The baseline severity of melasma was graded by Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) score. Group A, B, and C patients were treated with oral TXA 250 mg twice daily, daily MKF cream at night, and daily placebo cream at night, respectively, for 12 weeks. Improvement in MASI score was calculated after 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, adverse effects, if any, were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on intention to treat analysis, at the end of 12 weeks, the reduction in MASI score in oral TXA, MKF, and placebo groups was 9.94(65.91%), 6.12(54.78%), and 2.07(17.22%), respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.00). The difference in reduction of mean MASI scores after 12 weeks between oral TXA group and MKF group was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.29). The efficacy of oral TXA and MKB was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (<i>P</i> = 0.01 and <i>P</i> = 0.03, respectively). Adverse effects in all groups were mild and self-limiting.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A limited sample size, non-blinded design, and absence of dermoscopic evaluation were the study limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In view of its excellent safety profile, oral TXA may be considered as a better option for moderate to severe melasma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Dermatology Online Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Dermatology Online Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_797_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_797_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有各种治疗方法,但黄褐斑的治疗往往不彻底,复发率很高。本研究旨在评估口服氨甲环酸(TXA)、改良克利格曼配方(MKF)和安慰剂药膏对黄褐斑的疗效和安全性:90 例男女黄褐斑患者分为三组,每组 30 例。黄褐斑的基线严重程度由黄褐斑面积严重程度指数(MASI)评分。A、B、C组患者分别接受口服 TXA 250 毫克,每天两次,每天晚上使用 MKF 霜,每天晚上使用安慰剂霜,共治疗 12 周。4周、8周和12周后计算MASI评分的改善情况。每次就诊时,如果有不良反应,都会记录下来。统计分析采用卡方检验:根据意向治疗分析,12 周后,口服 TXA 组、MKF 组和安慰剂组的 MASI 评分分别降低了 9.94(65.91%)、6.12(54.78%) 和 2.07(17.22%)(P = 0.00)。口服 TXA 组和 MKF 组 12 周后的平均 MASI 评分降低率差异不显著(P = 0.29)。口服 TXA 和 MKB 组的疗效明显高于安慰剂组(P = 0.01 和 P = 0.03)。各组的不良反应均为轻微且有自限性:研究局限性:样本量有限、非盲法设计、未进行皮肤镜评估:结论:口服 TXA 具有极佳的安全性,可作为治疗中重度黄褐斑的较佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Oral Tranexamic Acid, Modified Kligman's Formula, and Placebo Cream in Melasma.

Background: Despite the availability of various treatment modalities, the treatment of melasma is often incomplete, with a high recurrence rate. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA), modified Kligman's formula (MKF), and a placebo cream in melasma.

Materials and methods: Ninety cases of melasma of both sexes were enrolled, and divided into three groups of 30 patients each. The baseline severity of melasma was graded by Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) score. Group A, B, and C patients were treated with oral TXA 250 mg twice daily, daily MKF cream at night, and daily placebo cream at night, respectively, for 12 weeks. Improvement in MASI score was calculated after 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, adverse effects, if any, were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test.

Results: Based on intention to treat analysis, at the end of 12 weeks, the reduction in MASI score in oral TXA, MKF, and placebo groups was 9.94(65.91%), 6.12(54.78%), and 2.07(17.22%), respectively (P = 0.00). The difference in reduction of mean MASI scores after 12 weeks between oral TXA group and MKF group was not significant (P = 0.29). The efficacy of oral TXA and MKB was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). Adverse effects in all groups were mild and self-limiting.

Limitations: A limited sample size, non-blinded design, and absence of dermoscopic evaluation were the study limitations.

Conclusion: In view of its excellent safety profile, oral TXA may be considered as a better option for moderate to severe melasma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
201
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bicalutamide in Dermatology: A Narrative Review. Clinicopathological Profile of Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A 10-Year Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Center in South India. Novel Inflammatory Markers Associated With Cutaneous Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis Etiology. Pediatric Basidiobolomycosis: An Uncommon and Misdiagnosed Entity. Premature Graying of Hair: A Comprehensive Review and Recent Insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1