Maria Cristina Pacheco, Susan L Fink, Dale Lee, Jane Dickerson
{"title":"组织转谷氨酰胺酶免疫球蛋白 A 对乳糜泻诊断的特异性超过内膜抗体,是正常值上限的≥10 倍。","authors":"Maria Cristina Pacheco, Susan L Fink, Dale Lee, Jane Dickerson","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.12382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Serologic diagnosis using tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (TTG-IgA) and endomysial antibody (EMA) is being integrated into the care of pediatric patients with positive screening for celiac disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of EMA in pediatric patients being considered for serologic diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with TTG-IgA testing performed between May 1, 2022 and April 30, 2023 and with subsequent duodenal biopsy within 6 months were included. TTG-IgA serum samples were frozen and sent for EMA testing and titer. EMA was evaluated for positivity and TTG-IgA (normal <15 u/mL) for elevation <10 times (10x) the upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≥10x ULN (≥150 u/mL). Sensitivity and specificity of EMA and TTG-IgA were calculated using biopsy histology as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and eighty-six patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity of TTG-IgA ≥15 u/mL was 87.5% and 95.4% while EMA was 77.5% and 97.3%. For patients with TTG-IgA ≥10x ULN the specificity was 99.3%. The positive predictive value of TTG-IgA at ≥10x ULN was 91.4% and for EMA was 83.6%. All three patients with false positive TTG-IgA ≥10x ULN also had false positive EMA, and two of these patients had type 1 diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TTG-IgA has greater sensitivity at the screening threshold of ≥15 u/mL and greater specificity and positive predictive value at ≥10x ULN than EMA. TTG-IgA at ≥10x ULN is superior to EMA for the serologic diagnosis of celiac disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A exceeds endomysial antibody in specificity of celiac diagnosis at ≥10 times the upper limit of normal.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cristina Pacheco, Susan L Fink, Dale Lee, Jane Dickerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpn3.12382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Serologic diagnosis using tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (TTG-IgA) and endomysial antibody (EMA) is being integrated into the care of pediatric patients with positive screening for celiac disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of EMA in pediatric patients being considered for serologic diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with TTG-IgA testing performed between May 1, 2022 and April 30, 2023 and with subsequent duodenal biopsy within 6 months were included. TTG-IgA serum samples were frozen and sent for EMA testing and titer. EMA was evaluated for positivity and TTG-IgA (normal <15 u/mL) for elevation <10 times (10x) the upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≥10x ULN (≥150 u/mL). Sensitivity and specificity of EMA and TTG-IgA were calculated using biopsy histology as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and eighty-six patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity of TTG-IgA ≥15 u/mL was 87.5% and 95.4% while EMA was 77.5% and 97.3%. For patients with TTG-IgA ≥10x ULN the specificity was 99.3%. The positive predictive value of TTG-IgA at ≥10x ULN was 91.4% and for EMA was 83.6%. All three patients with false positive TTG-IgA ≥10x ULN also had false positive EMA, and two of these patients had type 1 diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TTG-IgA has greater sensitivity at the screening threshold of ≥15 u/mL and greater specificity and positive predictive value at ≥10x ULN than EMA. TTG-IgA at ≥10x ULN is superior to EMA for the serologic diagnosis of celiac disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:使用组织转谷氨酰胺酶免疫球蛋白 A (TTG-IgA) 和内粘质抗体 (EMA) 进行血清学诊断正在被纳入乳糜泻筛查阳性儿科患者的治疗中。本研究旨在评估 EMA 在考虑进行血清学诊断的儿科患者中的实用性:方法:纳入2022年5月1日至2023年4月30日期间进行TTG-IgA检测并在6个月内进行十二指肠活检的患者。TTG-IgA血清样本冷冻后送去检测EMA和滴度。对 EMA 阳性和 TTG-IgA (正常)进行评估:共纳入 486 名患者。TTG-IgA ≥15 u/mL的敏感性和特异性分别为87.5%和95.4%,而EMA的敏感性和特异性分别为77.5%和97.3%。对于 TTG-IgA≥10x ULN 的患者,特异性为 99.3%。TTG-IgA≥10x ULN 的阳性预测值为 91.4%,EMA 为 83.6%。TTG-IgA≥10倍ULN假阳性的三位患者的EMA也都是假阳性,其中两位患者患有1型糖尿病:与 EMA 相比,TTG-IgA 在筛查阈值≥15 u/mL 时具有更高的灵敏度,在≥10 倍 ULN 时具有更高的特异性和阳性预测值。在乳糜泻的血清学诊断中,TTG-IgA 在≥10 倍 ULN 时优于 EMA。
Tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A exceeds endomysial antibody in specificity of celiac diagnosis at ≥10 times the upper limit of normal.
Objective: Serologic diagnosis using tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (TTG-IgA) and endomysial antibody (EMA) is being integrated into the care of pediatric patients with positive screening for celiac disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of EMA in pediatric patients being considered for serologic diagnosis.
Methods: Patients with TTG-IgA testing performed between May 1, 2022 and April 30, 2023 and with subsequent duodenal biopsy within 6 months were included. TTG-IgA serum samples were frozen and sent for EMA testing and titer. EMA was evaluated for positivity and TTG-IgA (normal <15 u/mL) for elevation <10 times (10x) the upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≥10x ULN (≥150 u/mL). Sensitivity and specificity of EMA and TTG-IgA were calculated using biopsy histology as the gold standard.
Results: Four hundred and eighty-six patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity of TTG-IgA ≥15 u/mL was 87.5% and 95.4% while EMA was 77.5% and 97.3%. For patients with TTG-IgA ≥10x ULN the specificity was 99.3%. The positive predictive value of TTG-IgA at ≥10x ULN was 91.4% and for EMA was 83.6%. All three patients with false positive TTG-IgA ≥10x ULN also had false positive EMA, and two of these patients had type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Conclusions: TTG-IgA has greater sensitivity at the screening threshold of ≥15 u/mL and greater specificity and positive predictive value at ≥10x ULN than EMA. TTG-IgA at ≥10x ULN is superior to EMA for the serologic diagnosis of celiac disease.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.