探索威尔士普通医疗服务资金分配的公平性:时间序列分析。

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0080
Jonny Currie, Kathrin Thomas, Anne Marie Cunningham, Kerry Bailey, Haroon Ahmed, Daniel Farewell, Sally Lewis
{"title":"探索威尔士普通医疗服务资金分配的公平性:时间序列分析。","authors":"Jonny Currie, Kathrin Thomas, Anne Marie Cunningham, Kerry Bailey, Haroon Ahmed, Daniel Farewell, Sally Lewis","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Good access to quality primary care in high-income countries can improve population health. Access to primary care is however often not equal among socioeconomic groups; our analysis sought to explore whether funding, a determinant of service supply, is equitably distributed among GP practices in Wales.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We sought to explore the relationship between funding and deprivation among GP practices in Wales, to understand the equity of current funding policies.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>We obtained funding data for general practices in Wales between 2014 and 2022 and explored the equity of distribution using the percentage of practice patients living in the 20% most deprived small areas in Wales. We generated a linear regression model exploring the relationship between practice funding and deprivation, with an interaction term with time in years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practice funding rose for all practices between 2014 and 2022. Practice deprivation and time in years were both associated with practice funding, with increases in practice deprivation associated with reduced funding allocations, and time being associated with a small increase in funding over the study period. Over the period of analysis of 2004-2022, for every 10% increase in patients living in the most deprived LSOAs, funding per patient decreases on average by 1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary cares in Wales in more deprived areas receive discernibly less funding per patient than those in less deprived areas. Given the potential and likelihood primary care can affect population health outcomes, this underinvestment may be contributing to existing health inequalities and requires urgent further analysis and action.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the equity of distribution of general medical services funding allocations in Wales: a time-series analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jonny Currie, Kathrin Thomas, Anne Marie Cunningham, Kerry Bailey, Haroon Ahmed, Daniel Farewell, Sally Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Good access to quality primary care in high-income countries can improve population health. Access to primary care is however often not equal among socioeconomic groups; our analysis sought to explore whether funding, a determinant of service supply, is equitably distributed among GP practices in Wales.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We sought to explore the relationship between funding and deprivation among GP practices in Wales, to understand the equity of current funding policies.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>We obtained funding data for general practices in Wales between 2014 and 2022 and explored the equity of distribution using the percentage of practice patients living in the 20% most deprived small areas in Wales. We generated a linear regression model exploring the relationship between practice funding and deprivation, with an interaction term with time in years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practice funding rose for all practices between 2014 and 2022. Practice deprivation and time in years were both associated with practice funding, with increases in practice deprivation associated with reduced funding allocations, and time being associated with a small increase in funding over the study period. Over the period of analysis of 2004-2022, for every 10% increase in patients living in the most deprived LSOAs, funding per patient decreases on average by 1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary cares in Wales in more deprived areas receive discernibly less funding per patient than those in less deprived areas. Given the potential and likelihood primary care can affect population health outcomes, this underinvestment may be contributing to existing health inequalities and requires urgent further analysis and action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在高收入国家,良好的优质全科医疗服务可以改善人口健康。然而,社会经济群体之间获得初级医疗服务的机会往往并不平等;我们的分析旨在探讨作为服务供应决定因素的资金是否在威尔士的全科医生诊所中公平分配。目的:我们试图探讨威尔士全科医生诊所的资金与贫困之间的关系,以了解当前资金政策的公平性:我们获得了 2014 年至 2022 年期间威尔士全科医疗机构的资金数据,并利用生活在威尔士 20% 最贫困小地区的医疗机构患者的百分比来探讨分配的公平性。我们建立了一个线性回归模型,探索诊所资金与贫困程度之间的关系,并与以年为单位的时间进行交互:结果:2014 年至 2022 年间,所有医疗机构的医疗经费都有所增加。实践的贫困程度和年限都与实践资金有关,实践贫困程度的增加与资金分配的减少有关,而年限则与研究期间资金的小幅增加有关。在 2004-2022 年的分析期内,居住在最贫困地区的病人每增加 10%,每名病人的经费就会平均减少 1%:结论:威尔士较贫困地区的初级保健机构与较不贫困地区的初级保健机构相比,每名患者获得的资助明显较少。考虑到初级保健对人口健康结果的潜在影响和可能性,这种投资不足可能会导致现有的健康不平等,因此迫切需要进一步分析和采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the equity of distribution of general medical services funding allocations in Wales: a time-series analysis.

Background: Good access to quality primary care in high-income countries can improve population health. Access to primary care is however often not equal among socioeconomic groups; our analysis sought to explore whether funding, a determinant of service supply, is equitably distributed among GP practices in Wales.

Aim: We sought to explore the relationship between funding and deprivation among GP practices in Wales, to understand the equity of current funding policies.

Design & setting: We obtained funding data for general practices in Wales between 2014 and 2022 and explored the equity of distribution using the percentage of practice patients living in the 20% most deprived small areas in Wales. We generated a linear regression model exploring the relationship between practice funding and deprivation, with an interaction term with time in years.

Results: Practice funding rose for all practices between 2014 and 2022. Practice deprivation and time in years were both associated with practice funding, with increases in practice deprivation associated with reduced funding allocations, and time being associated with a small increase in funding over the study period. Over the period of analysis of 2004-2022, for every 10% increase in patients living in the most deprived LSOAs, funding per patient decreases on average by 1%.

Conclusion: Primary cares in Wales in more deprived areas receive discernibly less funding per patient than those in less deprived areas. Given the potential and likelihood primary care can affect population health outcomes, this underinvestment may be contributing to existing health inequalities and requires urgent further analysis and action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1