M Pavone, S Di Berardino, G Esposito, A Baroni, M D'Indinosante, M T Giudice, A Gioé, F Campolo, U Catena, G Scambia, F Fanfani, S Restaino
{"title":"由接受过培训的外科医生在子宫切除术后进行 3D 与 4K 腹腔镜阴道袖带闭合术:一项前瞻性随机试验。","authors":"M Pavone, S Di Berardino, G Esposito, A Baroni, M D'Indinosante, M T Giudice, A Gioé, F Campolo, U Catena, G Scambia, F Fanfani, S Restaino","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.16.3.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technological advances in visual systems have contributed to overcoming the limitations in spatial perception of minimally invasive techniques. To date, there is a lack of literature on the advantages of 3D vision systems over 4K in laparoscopic surgery, although benefits have been observed in the training setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare operating times, perioperative outcomes, and task achievement using 3D and 4K vision systems for vaginal cuff closure performed by residents during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). All surgeons in training have obtained the Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) certificate.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a prospective randomised trial (NCT04637022). Women undergoing total hysterectomies for benign conditions between January 2021 and November 2023 were enrolled in the study. Vaginal cuff closures were performed by surgeons in training who had obtained the second level of the GESEA programme certificate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients were enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences in time between 3D and 4K vision for vaginal cuff closure (p=0.918). No statistically significant differences were observed for mean estimated blood loss (EBL) (overall: 62.85 ± 22.73mL; 3D: 65 ± 24.83mL; 4K: 61.11 ± 21.18; p=0.556) and median hospital stay (p=0.234). Three non-severe intraoperative complications in the 3D group (p=0.048) and three postoperative complications in the entire cohort (p=0.685) were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The operating time for vaginal cuff closure performed by trainee surgeons is similar when comparing 3D vision during conventional laparoscopy and 4K vision systems. The choice of surgical vision systems may be guided by a cost analysis and surgeon preferences.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Substantial evidence is lacking regarding the advantages of incorporating 3D vision into standard laparoscopy for gynaecological surgery. This research seeks to assess whether the 3D visual system can provide benefits as compared to 4K visualisation during laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure performed by surgeons in training within the GESEA 2 certification programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"16 3","pages":"317-323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"M Pavone, S Di Berardino, G Esposito, A Baroni, M D'Indinosante, M T Giudice, A Gioé, F Campolo, U Catena, G Scambia, F Fanfani, S Restaino\",\"doi\":\"10.52054/FVVO.16.3.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technological advances in visual systems have contributed to overcoming the limitations in spatial perception of minimally invasive techniques. To date, there is a lack of literature on the advantages of 3D vision systems over 4K in laparoscopic surgery, although benefits have been observed in the training setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare operating times, perioperative outcomes, and task achievement using 3D and 4K vision systems for vaginal cuff closure performed by residents during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). All surgeons in training have obtained the Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) certificate.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a prospective randomised trial (NCT04637022). Women undergoing total hysterectomies for benign conditions between January 2021 and November 2023 were enrolled in the study. Vaginal cuff closures were performed by surgeons in training who had obtained the second level of the GESEA programme certificate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients were enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences in time between 3D and 4K vision for vaginal cuff closure (p=0.918). No statistically significant differences were observed for mean estimated blood loss (EBL) (overall: 62.85 ± 22.73mL; 3D: 65 ± 24.83mL; 4K: 61.11 ± 21.18; p=0.556) and median hospital stay (p=0.234). Three non-severe intraoperative complications in the 3D group (p=0.048) and three postoperative complications in the entire cohort (p=0.685) were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The operating time for vaginal cuff closure performed by trainee surgeons is similar when comparing 3D vision during conventional laparoscopy and 4K vision systems. The choice of surgical vision systems may be guided by a cost analysis and surgeon preferences.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Substantial evidence is lacking regarding the advantages of incorporating 3D vision into standard laparoscopy for gynaecological surgery. This research seeks to assess whether the 3D visual system can provide benefits as compared to 4K visualisation during laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure performed by surgeons in training within the GESEA 2 certification programme.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"317-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.3.029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.3.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:视觉系统的技术进步有助于克服微创技术在空间感知方面的局限性。迄今为止,尽管在培训环境中已观察到 3D 视觉系统比 4K 视觉系统在腹腔镜手术中的优势,但缺乏这方面的文献:目的:比较住院医生在全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)中使用 3D 和 4K 视觉系统进行阴道袖带闭合的手术时间、围术期效果和任务完成情况。所有接受培训的外科医生均已获得妇科内窥镜手术教育和评估(GESEA)证书:这是一项前瞻性随机试验(NCT04637022)。2021年1月至2023年11月期间,因良性疾病接受全子宫切除术的女性被纳入研究。阴道袖带闭合术由获得 GESEA 项目二级证书的受训外科医生实施:结果:54 名患者参与了研究。3D和4K视野下阴道袖带闭合的时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.918)。平均估计失血量(EBL)(总体:62.85 ± 22.73mL;3D:65 ± 24.83mL;4K:61.11 ± 21.18;p=0.556)和中位住院时间(p=0.234)无统计学差异。3D组有3例非严重术中并发症(p=0.048),整个组群有3例术后并发症(p=0.685):结论:比较传统腹腔镜手术中的3D视觉系统和4K视觉系统,见习外科医生进行阴道袖带闭合术的手术时间相似。手术视觉系统的选择可根据成本分析和外科医生的偏好来决定:关于在妇科手术的标准腹腔镜中加入3D视觉的优势,目前还缺乏大量证据。这项研究旨在评估在GESEA 2认证项目中接受培训的外科医生在进行腹腔镜阴道袖带闭合术时,3D视觉系统与4K视觉系统相比是否具有优势。
3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial.
Background: Technological advances in visual systems have contributed to overcoming the limitations in spatial perception of minimally invasive techniques. To date, there is a lack of literature on the advantages of 3D vision systems over 4K in laparoscopic surgery, although benefits have been observed in the training setting.
Objectives: To compare operating times, perioperative outcomes, and task achievement using 3D and 4K vision systems for vaginal cuff closure performed by residents during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). All surgeons in training have obtained the Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) certificate.
Materials and methods: This is a prospective randomised trial (NCT04637022). Women undergoing total hysterectomies for benign conditions between January 2021 and November 2023 were enrolled in the study. Vaginal cuff closures were performed by surgeons in training who had obtained the second level of the GESEA programme certificate.
Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences in time between 3D and 4K vision for vaginal cuff closure (p=0.918). No statistically significant differences were observed for mean estimated blood loss (EBL) (overall: 62.85 ± 22.73mL; 3D: 65 ± 24.83mL; 4K: 61.11 ± 21.18; p=0.556) and median hospital stay (p=0.234). Three non-severe intraoperative complications in the 3D group (p=0.048) and three postoperative complications in the entire cohort (p=0.685) were reported.
Conclusions: The operating time for vaginal cuff closure performed by trainee surgeons is similar when comparing 3D vision during conventional laparoscopy and 4K vision systems. The choice of surgical vision systems may be guided by a cost analysis and surgeon preferences.
What is new?: Substantial evidence is lacking regarding the advantages of incorporating 3D vision into standard laparoscopy for gynaecological surgery. This research seeks to assess whether the 3D visual system can provide benefits as compared to 4K visualisation during laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure performed by surgeons in training within the GESEA 2 certification programme.