子宫龛的结构化宫腔镜检查:改良德尔菲程序。

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.52054/FVVO.16.3.036
N Min, R A de Leeuw, L F van der Voet, A Di Spiezio Sardo, P N Barri-Soldevila, M Dueholm, O Donnez, E Saridogan, T J Clark, H A M Brolmann, A L Thurkow, D Jurkovic, T van den Bosch, T Bourne, W J K Hehenkamp, J A F Huirne
{"title":"子宫龛的结构化宫腔镜检查:改良德尔菲程序。","authors":"N Min, R A de Leeuw, L F van der Voet, A Di Spiezio Sardo, P N Barri-Soldevila, M Dueholm, O Donnez, E Saridogan, T J Clark, H A M Brolmann, A L Thurkow, D Jurkovic, T van den Bosch, T Bourne, W J K Hehenkamp, J A F Huirne","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.16.3.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uterine niches in the Caesarean section scar are seen in approximately half of women with a history of caesarean delivery. Whilst a structured ultrasound assessment of caesarean defects has been described, there is no consensus on a structured hysteroscopic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To propose a methodology for a structured hysteroscopic evaluation of uterine niches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a modified Delphi procedure, including two online rounds and two face-to-face meetings of the members of the ESGE Uterine Niches Working Group. The taskforce members have extensive experience in hysteroscopic niche evaluation. The consensus was predefined as a Rate of Agreement of at least 75%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen experts participated in this modified Delphi procedure. There was consensus on the need for a standardised methodology and the hysteroscopic definition of a niche as any indentation in the myometrium at the site of a previous CS. There was consensus that a hysteroscopic evaluation of a niche must be combined with ultrasound to measure the residual myometrial thickness. In addition, it was agreed that niches should be subclassified as 'simple', 'simple with one branch', or 'complex'. There was consensus that the following items should be described during a hysteroscopic niche evaluation: the number of niches, the size in relation to the size of cervical canal, the presence of polyps, crypts, cysts, fibrotic tissue, blood, mucus, placental remnants, a dynamic valve, the appearance of the endometrium, the number of blood vessels and bleeding from blood vessels within the defect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a modified Delphi procedure with international experts, consensus was achieved on the hysteroscopic evaluation and classification of niches in the uterine caesarean section scar.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>A structured registration form was developed to aid consistency in hysteroscopic niche reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"16 3","pages":"253-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structured hysteroscopic examination of uterine niches: a modified Delphi procedure.\",\"authors\":\"N Min, R A de Leeuw, L F van der Voet, A Di Spiezio Sardo, P N Barri-Soldevila, M Dueholm, O Donnez, E Saridogan, T J Clark, H A M Brolmann, A L Thurkow, D Jurkovic, T van den Bosch, T Bourne, W J K Hehenkamp, J A F Huirne\",\"doi\":\"10.52054/FVVO.16.3.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uterine niches in the Caesarean section scar are seen in approximately half of women with a history of caesarean delivery. Whilst a structured ultrasound assessment of caesarean defects has been described, there is no consensus on a structured hysteroscopic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To propose a methodology for a structured hysteroscopic evaluation of uterine niches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a modified Delphi procedure, including two online rounds and two face-to-face meetings of the members of the ESGE Uterine Niches Working Group. The taskforce members have extensive experience in hysteroscopic niche evaluation. The consensus was predefined as a Rate of Agreement of at least 75%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen experts participated in this modified Delphi procedure. There was consensus on the need for a standardised methodology and the hysteroscopic definition of a niche as any indentation in the myometrium at the site of a previous CS. There was consensus that a hysteroscopic evaluation of a niche must be combined with ultrasound to measure the residual myometrial thickness. In addition, it was agreed that niches should be subclassified as 'simple', 'simple with one branch', or 'complex'. There was consensus that the following items should be described during a hysteroscopic niche evaluation: the number of niches, the size in relation to the size of cervical canal, the presence of polyps, crypts, cysts, fibrotic tissue, blood, mucus, placental remnants, a dynamic valve, the appearance of the endometrium, the number of blood vessels and bleeding from blood vessels within the defect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a modified Delphi procedure with international experts, consensus was achieved on the hysteroscopic evaluation and classification of niches in the uterine caesarean section scar.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>A structured registration form was developed to aid consistency in hysteroscopic niche reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"253-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.3.036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.3.036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在有剖腹产史的妇女中,大约有一半人的剖腹产瘢痕处会出现子宫龛。虽然对剖腹产缺陷的结构化超声评估已有描述,但对结构化宫腔镜评估尚未达成共识:材料与方法:我们采用了改良的德尔菲程序,包括两轮在线讨论和两次 ESGE 子宫龛工作组成员面对面会议。工作组成员在宫腔镜子宫龛评估方面拥有丰富的经验。结果:结果:13 位专家参与了这一修改后的德尔菲程序。大家一致认为需要一种标准化的方法,并将宫腔镜下的龛影定义为既往CS部位子宫肌层的任何凹陷。大家一致认为,宫腔镜下的龛影评估必须与超声相结合,以测量残余的子宫肌层厚度。此外,会议还一致认为应将龛影细分为 "简单"、"有一分支的简单 "或 "复杂"。大家一致认为,在宫腔镜龛评估中应描述以下项目:龛的数量、与宫颈管大小相关的大小、是否存在息肉、隐窝、囊肿、纤维组织、血液、粘液、胎盘残留物、动态瓣膜、子宫内膜的外观、血管的数量以及缺损处血管的出血情况:国际专家通过改良德尔菲程序,就子宫剖腹产瘢痕龛影的宫腔镜评估和分类达成了共识:开发了结构化登记表,有助于宫腔镜龛报告的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structured hysteroscopic examination of uterine niches: a modified Delphi procedure.

Background: Uterine niches in the Caesarean section scar are seen in approximately half of women with a history of caesarean delivery. Whilst a structured ultrasound assessment of caesarean defects has been described, there is no consensus on a structured hysteroscopic evaluation.

Objectives: To propose a methodology for a structured hysteroscopic evaluation of uterine niches.

Materials and methods: We conducted a modified Delphi procedure, including two online rounds and two face-to-face meetings of the members of the ESGE Uterine Niches Working Group. The taskforce members have extensive experience in hysteroscopic niche evaluation. The consensus was predefined as a Rate of Agreement of at least 75%.

Results: Thirteen experts participated in this modified Delphi procedure. There was consensus on the need for a standardised methodology and the hysteroscopic definition of a niche as any indentation in the myometrium at the site of a previous CS. There was consensus that a hysteroscopic evaluation of a niche must be combined with ultrasound to measure the residual myometrial thickness. In addition, it was agreed that niches should be subclassified as 'simple', 'simple with one branch', or 'complex'. There was consensus that the following items should be described during a hysteroscopic niche evaluation: the number of niches, the size in relation to the size of cervical canal, the presence of polyps, crypts, cysts, fibrotic tissue, blood, mucus, placental remnants, a dynamic valve, the appearance of the endometrium, the number of blood vessels and bleeding from blood vessels within the defect.

Conclusion: Using a modified Delphi procedure with international experts, consensus was achieved on the hysteroscopic evaluation and classification of niches in the uterine caesarean section scar.

What is new?: A structured registration form was developed to aid consistency in hysteroscopic niche reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial. Achieving successful outcomes with endometrial ablation needs better case selection. Author's response. Caesarean scar defect and retained products of conception (RPOC): a step-by-step combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment. Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1