双韧带固定全膝关节置换术与双韧带稳定全膝关节置换术相比,失血量更少。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2428-1293
Takashi Kozu, Takanori Iriuchishima, Keinosuke Ryu, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi
{"title":"双韧带固定全膝关节置换术与双韧带稳定全膝关节置换术相比,失血量更少。","authors":"Takashi Kozu, Takanori Iriuchishima, Keinosuke Ryu, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi","doi":"10.1055/a-2428-1293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure to treat end-stage knee osteoarthritis. This study compared blood loss volume and other clinical outcomes between bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) and bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA. Materials and Methods Ninety-seven participants who underwent unilateral TKA were enrolled. The BCS-TKA and BCR-TKA groups comprised 78 and 19 participants, respectively. Blood loss was calculated using preoperative and postoperative hematocrit values, height, weight, and sex. Measurements were taken immediately after surgery, on days 1 and 7, and total blood loss was calculated up to day 7. Operation time, range of motion at 7 and 14 days postoperatively, blood transfusion requirement, and postoperative complications such as infection, hematoma, and deep vein thrombosis were compared between the groups. Results Blood loss was comparable between groups at all time points (125.7 vs. 105.4 mL, 57.9 vs. 43.5 mL, and 68.2 vs. 41.7 mL for immediate, day 1, and day 7 postoperatively, respectively; all p>0.05) except for total blood loss, which was significantly lower in the BCR group compared with the BCS group (190.7 vs. 251.1 mL; p<0.05). The BCR group also had a longer operation time than the BCS group (131.2 vs. 112.4 min; p<0.05). No other significant differences were observed in other outcomes. Conclusion Total blood loss up to seven days postoperatively was significantly lower in the BCR group than in the BCS group despite a longer operation time. This may be attributed to the reduced bone resection and greater soft tissue preservation, including the anterior cruciate and posterior cruciate ligaments, in the BCR technique. Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate stabilized, blood loss volume, osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower blood loss with bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty compared with bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Kozu, Takanori Iriuchishima, Keinosuke Ryu, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2428-1293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure to treat end-stage knee osteoarthritis. This study compared blood loss volume and other clinical outcomes between bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) and bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA. Materials and Methods Ninety-seven participants who underwent unilateral TKA were enrolled. The BCS-TKA and BCR-TKA groups comprised 78 and 19 participants, respectively. Blood loss was calculated using preoperative and postoperative hematocrit values, height, weight, and sex. Measurements were taken immediately after surgery, on days 1 and 7, and total blood loss was calculated up to day 7. Operation time, range of motion at 7 and 14 days postoperatively, blood transfusion requirement, and postoperative complications such as infection, hematoma, and deep vein thrombosis were compared between the groups. Results Blood loss was comparable between groups at all time points (125.7 vs. 105.4 mL, 57.9 vs. 43.5 mL, and 68.2 vs. 41.7 mL for immediate, day 1, and day 7 postoperatively, respectively; all p>0.05) except for total blood loss, which was significantly lower in the BCR group compared with the BCS group (190.7 vs. 251.1 mL; p<0.05). The BCR group also had a longer operation time than the BCS group (131.2 vs. 112.4 min; p<0.05). No other significant differences were observed in other outcomes. Conclusion Total blood loss up to seven days postoperatively was significantly lower in the BCR group than in the BCS group despite a longer operation time. This may be attributed to the reduced bone resection and greater soft tissue preservation, including the anterior cruciate and posterior cruciate ligaments, in the BCR technique. Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate stabilized, blood loss volume, osteoarthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2428-1293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2428-1293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:全膝关节置换术(TKA)是治疗终末期膝关节骨性关节炎的常见手术方法。本研究比较了双髋关节固定(BCR)和双髋关节稳定(BCS)TKA 的失血量和其他临床结果。材料和方法 登记了 97 名接受单侧 TKA 的患者。BCS-TKA组和BCR-TKA组分别有78人和19人。根据术前和术后血细胞比容值、身高、体重和性别计算失血量。术后第 1 天和第 7 天立即进行测量,计算截至第 7 天的总失血量。比较了各组的手术时间、术后 7 天和 14 天的活动范围、输血需求以及术后并发症(如感染、血肿和深静脉血栓)。结果 各组在所有时间点的失血量相当(术后即刻、术后第 1 天和术后第 7 天的失血量分别为 125.7 毫升对 105.4 毫升、57.9 毫升对 43.5 毫升和 68.2 毫升对 41.7 毫升;均 p>0.05),但总失血量除外,BCR 组明显低于 BCS 组(190.7 毫升对 251.1 毫升;p>0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lower blood loss with bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty compared with bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure to treat end-stage knee osteoarthritis. This study compared blood loss volume and other clinical outcomes between bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) and bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA. Materials and Methods Ninety-seven participants who underwent unilateral TKA were enrolled. The BCS-TKA and BCR-TKA groups comprised 78 and 19 participants, respectively. Blood loss was calculated using preoperative and postoperative hematocrit values, height, weight, and sex. Measurements were taken immediately after surgery, on days 1 and 7, and total blood loss was calculated up to day 7. Operation time, range of motion at 7 and 14 days postoperatively, blood transfusion requirement, and postoperative complications such as infection, hematoma, and deep vein thrombosis were compared between the groups. Results Blood loss was comparable between groups at all time points (125.7 vs. 105.4 mL, 57.9 vs. 43.5 mL, and 68.2 vs. 41.7 mL for immediate, day 1, and day 7 postoperatively, respectively; all p>0.05) except for total blood loss, which was significantly lower in the BCR group compared with the BCS group (190.7 vs. 251.1 mL; p<0.05). The BCR group also had a longer operation time than the BCS group (131.2 vs. 112.4 min; p<0.05). No other significant differences were observed in other outcomes. Conclusion Total blood loss up to seven days postoperatively was significantly lower in the BCR group than in the BCS group despite a longer operation time. This may be attributed to the reduced bone resection and greater soft tissue preservation, including the anterior cruciate and posterior cruciate ligaments, in the BCR technique. Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate stabilized, blood loss volume, osteoarthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor on "A Longitudinal Analysis of Weight Changes before and after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Weight Trends, Patterns, and Predictors". Inclinometers and Apps Are Better than Goniometers, Measuring Knee Extension Range of Motion in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Patients: Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change for the Three Devices. Factors Associated with Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Focus on Athletes Who Desire Preinjury Level of Sport. Is Immediate Postoperative Radiograph Necessary Following Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty? Late Manipulation under Anesthesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Improved Range of Motion and a Low Complication Rate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1