双肺移植后的单肺再移植结果

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.039
Victoria Yin, John C S Rodman, Scott M Atay, Sean C Wightman, Graeme M Rosenberg, Brooks V Udelsman, Sivagini Ganesh, Peter Chung, Anthony W Kim, Takashi Harano
{"title":"双肺移植后的单肺再移植结果","authors":"Victoria Yin, John C S Rodman, Scott M Atay, Sean C Wightman, Graeme M Rosenberg, Brooks V Udelsman, Sivagini Ganesh, Peter Chung, Anthony W Kim, Takashi Harano","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes of single-lung retransplantation (SLRTx) and double-lung retransplantation (DLRTx) after an initial double-lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database between May 2005 and December 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Multiorgan transplantations, repeated retransplantations, and lung retransplantations when the status of the initial transplantation was unknown were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 891 patients were included in the analysis, included 698 (78.3%) with DLRTx and 193 (21.7%) with SLRTx. The mean lung allocation score was higher in the DLRTx group (59.6 ± 20.7 vs 55.1 ± 19.3; P = .007). The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridge to lung transplantation was similar in the 2 groups (P = .125), as was waitlist time (P = .610). The need for mechanical ventilation (54.6% vs 35.8%; P = .005) and ECMO (17.9% vs 9.0%; P = .069) at 72 hours post-transplantation was greater in the DLRTx group. However, median post-transplantation hospital stay (21.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 12-35] days versus 20 [IQR, 12-35] days; P = .119) and in-hospital mortality (10.9% [n = 76/698] vs 12.4% [n = 24/193]; P = .547) were comparable in the 2 groups. Long-term survival was significantly better in the DLRTx group (P < .001, log-rank test). In the propensity score-weighted multivariable model, the DLRTx group had 28% lower risk of mortality at any point during follow-up compared to the SLRTx group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.91; P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The less invasiveness of single-lung transplantation in the retransplantation setting has minimal short-term benefit and is associated with significantly worse long-term survival. Double-lung retransplantation should remain the standard for lung retransplantation after initial double-lung transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of single-lung retransplantation after double-lung transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Yin, John C S Rodman, Scott M Atay, Sean C Wightman, Graeme M Rosenberg, Brooks V Udelsman, Sivagini Ganesh, Peter Chung, Anthony W Kim, Takashi Harano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes of single-lung retransplantation (SLRTx) and double-lung retransplantation (DLRTx) after an initial double-lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database between May 2005 and December 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Multiorgan transplantations, repeated retransplantations, and lung retransplantations when the status of the initial transplantation was unknown were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 891 patients were included in the analysis, included 698 (78.3%) with DLRTx and 193 (21.7%) with SLRTx. The mean lung allocation score was higher in the DLRTx group (59.6 ± 20.7 vs 55.1 ± 19.3; P = .007). The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridge to lung transplantation was similar in the 2 groups (P = .125), as was waitlist time (P = .610). The need for mechanical ventilation (54.6% vs 35.8%; P = .005) and ECMO (17.9% vs 9.0%; P = .069) at 72 hours post-transplantation was greater in the DLRTx group. However, median post-transplantation hospital stay (21.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 12-35] days versus 20 [IQR, 12-35] days; P = .119) and in-hospital mortality (10.9% [n = 76/698] vs 12.4% [n = 24/193]; P = .547) were comparable in the 2 groups. Long-term survival was significantly better in the DLRTx group (P < .001, log-rank test). In the propensity score-weighted multivariable model, the DLRTx group had 28% lower risk of mortality at any point during follow-up compared to the SLRTx group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.91; P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The less invasiveness of single-lung transplantation in the retransplantation setting has minimal short-term benefit and is associated with significantly worse long-term survival. Double-lung retransplantation should remain the standard for lung retransplantation after initial double-lung transplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.039\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.039","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在比较初次双肺移植后进行单肺再移植(SLRTx)和双肺再移植(DLRTx)的结果:方法:对2005年5月至2022年12月期间的器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络数据库进行了回顾性分析。方法:对2005年5月至2022年12月期间的器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络数据库进行了回顾性分析,排除了多器官移植、重复再移植以及初次移植状况不明的肺再移植:分析共纳入891例患者:698例(78.3%)为DLRTx,193例(21.7%)为SLRTx。DLRTx患者的平均肺分配评分更高(59.6±20.7 vs 55.1±19.3,P = 0.007)。体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)桥接肺移植的使用情况在各组之间相似(P=0.125),等待时间也相似(P=0.610)。DLRTx组在移植后72小时内需要机械通气(54.6% vs 35.8%,p=0.005)和ECMO(17.9% vs 9.0%,p=0.069)的频率更高。然而,移植后中位住院时间(21.5 [IQR 12-35] vs 20 天 [IQR12-35],p=0.119)和院内死亡率(10.9% [76/698] vs 12.4% [24/193],p=0.547)在两组之间不相上下。DLRTx组的长期生存率明显更高(对数秩检验 p < 0.001)。在倾向分数加权多变量模型中,DLRTx与SLRTx相比,在随访期间任何时间点的死亡风险均低28%(HR:0.72,95%置信区间:0.57-0.91,P=0.006):结论:在再移植情况下,单肺移植的创面较小,短期获益甚微,但长期生存率却明显较低。双肺再移植仍应是初次双肺移植后进行肺再移植的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of single-lung retransplantation after double-lung transplantation.

Objective: To compare outcomes of single-lung retransplantation (SLRTx) and double-lung retransplantation (DLRTx) after an initial double-lung transplantation.

Methods: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database between May 2005 and December 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Multiorgan transplantations, repeated retransplantations, and lung retransplantations when the status of the initial transplantation was unknown were excluded.

Results: A total of 891 patients were included in the analysis, included 698 (78.3%) with DLRTx and 193 (21.7%) with SLRTx. The mean lung allocation score was higher in the DLRTx group (59.6 ± 20.7 vs 55.1 ± 19.3; P = .007). The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridge to lung transplantation was similar in the 2 groups (P = .125), as was waitlist time (P = .610). The need for mechanical ventilation (54.6% vs 35.8%; P = .005) and ECMO (17.9% vs 9.0%; P = .069) at 72 hours post-transplantation was greater in the DLRTx group. However, median post-transplantation hospital stay (21.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 12-35] days versus 20 [IQR, 12-35] days; P = .119) and in-hospital mortality (10.9% [n = 76/698] vs 12.4% [n = 24/193]; P = .547) were comparable in the 2 groups. Long-term survival was significantly better in the DLRTx group (P < .001, log-rank test). In the propensity score-weighted multivariable model, the DLRTx group had 28% lower risk of mortality at any point during follow-up compared to the SLRTx group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.91; P = .006).

Conclusions: The less invasiveness of single-lung transplantation in the retransplantation setting has minimal short-term benefit and is associated with significantly worse long-term survival. Double-lung retransplantation should remain the standard for lung retransplantation after initial double-lung transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
期刊最新文献
Lung Transplantation After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in High-Risk Recipients: A Propensity Matched Analysis of a National Database. Donor and Recipient Factors Associated with Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation: A DMG Registry Analysis. Also, long live the joint general surgery/thoracic surgery (4+3) pathway! Commentator Discussion: Cardiac Surgical Unit-Advanced Life Support-certified centers are associated with improved failure to rescue after cardiac arrest: A propensity score-matched analysis. Commentator Discussion: Personalizing patient risk of a life-altering event: An application of machine learning to hemiarch surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1