肝门静脉比值是否适用于评估欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 的肝胆期?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Medical Imaging Reviews Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315
Chao Wang, Yancheng Song, Zhibin Pan, Guoce Li, Fenghai Liu, Xiaodong Yuan
{"title":"肝门静脉比值是否适用于评估欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 的肝胆期?","authors":"Chao Wang, Yancheng Song, Zhibin Pan, Guoce Li, Fenghai Liu, Xiaodong Yuan","doi":"10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to verify whether the Liver-to-portal Ratio (LPR) can assess the adequacy of the Hepatobiliary Phase (HBP) for patients with different liver functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 125 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and graded into the non-cirrhosis group (45), Child-Pugh A group (40), and Child- Pugh B/C group (40). The LPR on HBP was calculated after eight HBPs were obtained within 5-40 minutes. The adequate HBP was determined according to the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus statement. The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were analyzed by paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. The chisquare test was used to test the difference in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were significant in Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B/C groups (P < 0.05), except for the non-cirrhosis group (P > 0.05). The differences in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were not statistically significant in all groups (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adequate HBP obtained according to the 2016 ESGAR consensus statement could provide larger LPR and better lesions' conspicuity than 10- min HBP, especially for cirrhotic patients; however, the efficacy of using an LPR cutoff of 1.462 as the standard of the adequate HBP may be compromised in patients with cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e15734056318603"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whether the Liver-to-Portal Vein Ratio is Applicable for Evaluating the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology Hepatobiliary Phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI?\",\"authors\":\"Chao Wang, Yancheng Song, Zhibin Pan, Guoce Li, Fenghai Liu, Xiaodong Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to verify whether the Liver-to-portal Ratio (LPR) can assess the adequacy of the Hepatobiliary Phase (HBP) for patients with different liver functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 125 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and graded into the non-cirrhosis group (45), Child-Pugh A group (40), and Child- Pugh B/C group (40). The LPR on HBP was calculated after eight HBPs were obtained within 5-40 minutes. The adequate HBP was determined according to the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus statement. The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were analyzed by paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. The chisquare test was used to test the difference in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were significant in Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B/C groups (P < 0.05), except for the non-cirrhosis group (P > 0.05). The differences in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were not statistically significant in all groups (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adequate HBP obtained according to the 2016 ESGAR consensus statement could provide larger LPR and better lesions' conspicuity than 10- min HBP, especially for cirrhotic patients; however, the efficacy of using an LPR cutoff of 1.462 as the standard of the adequate HBP may be compromised in patients with cirrhosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e15734056318603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在验证肝门比值(LPR)能否评估不同肝功能患者肝胆期(HBP)的充分性:共有125名患者被纳入前瞻性研究,并被分为非肝硬化组(45人)、Child-Pugh A组(40人)和Child-Pugh B/C组(40人)。在 5-40 分钟内获得 8 次 HBP 后,计算 HBP 的 LPR。适当的 HBP 是根据 2016 年欧洲胃肠和腹部放射学会(ESGAR)共识声明确定的。10 分钟 HBP 和充分 HBP 之间 LPR 和病变显露度的差异分别采用配对 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行分析。对 10 分钟 HBP 和足量 HBP 之间 LPR 大于 1.462 的比例差异采用秩和检验:除非肝硬化组(P>0.05)外,Child-Pugh A组和Child-Pugh B/C组在10 min HBP和足量HBP之间的LPR和病变的明显程度差异显著(P<0.05)。在所有组别中,10 分钟 HBP 与足够 HBP 之间 LPR 大于 1.462 的比例差异均无统计学意义(均 P > 0.05):结论:与 10 分钟 HBP 相比,根据 2016 年 ESGAR 共识声明获得的足够 HBP 可以提供更大的 LPR 和更好的病变清晰度,尤其是对于肝硬化患者;但是,将 LPR 临界值 1.462 作为足够 HBP 的标准可能会影响肝硬化患者的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whether the Liver-to-Portal Vein Ratio is Applicable for Evaluating the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology Hepatobiliary Phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI?

Purpose: This study aimed to verify whether the Liver-to-portal Ratio (LPR) can assess the adequacy of the Hepatobiliary Phase (HBP) for patients with different liver functions.

Methods: A total of 125 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and graded into the non-cirrhosis group (45), Child-Pugh A group (40), and Child- Pugh B/C group (40). The LPR on HBP was calculated after eight HBPs were obtained within 5-40 minutes. The adequate HBP was determined according to the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus statement. The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were analyzed by paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. The chisquare test was used to test the difference in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP.

Results: The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were significant in Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B/C groups (P < 0.05), except for the non-cirrhosis group (P > 0.05). The differences in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were not statistically significant in all groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The adequate HBP obtained according to the 2016 ESGAR consensus statement could provide larger LPR and better lesions' conspicuity than 10- min HBP, especially for cirrhotic patients; however, the efficacy of using an LPR cutoff of 1.462 as the standard of the adequate HBP may be compromised in patients with cirrhosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
期刊最新文献
Advanced Lung Disease Detection: CBAM-Augmented, Lightweight EfficientNetB2 with Visual Insights. Multiple Pulmonary Sclerosing Haemangiomas with a Cavity: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. An Integrated Approach using YOLOv8 and ResNet, SeResNet & Vision Transformer (ViT) Algorithms based on ROI Fracture Prediction in X-ray Images of the Elbow. Combination of Different Sectional Elastography Techniques with Age to Optimize the Downgrading of Breast BI-RAIDS Class 4a Nodules. Prenatal Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Diagnosis of Dural Sinus Arteriovenous Malformation: An Unusual Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1