{"title":"肝门静脉比值是否适用于评估欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 的肝胆期?","authors":"Chao Wang, Yancheng Song, Zhibin Pan, Guoce Li, Fenghai Liu, Xiaodong Yuan","doi":"10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to verify whether the Liver-to-portal Ratio (LPR) can assess the adequacy of the Hepatobiliary Phase (HBP) for patients with different liver functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 125 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and graded into the non-cirrhosis group (45), Child-Pugh A group (40), and Child- Pugh B/C group (40). The LPR on HBP was calculated after eight HBPs were obtained within 5-40 minutes. The adequate HBP was determined according to the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus statement. The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were analyzed by paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. The chisquare test was used to test the difference in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were significant in Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B/C groups (P < 0.05), except for the non-cirrhosis group (P > 0.05). The differences in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were not statistically significant in all groups (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adequate HBP obtained according to the 2016 ESGAR consensus statement could provide larger LPR and better lesions' conspicuity than 10- min HBP, especially for cirrhotic patients; however, the efficacy of using an LPR cutoff of 1.462 as the standard of the adequate HBP may be compromised in patients with cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e15734056318603"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whether the Liver-to-Portal Vein Ratio is Applicable for Evaluating the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology Hepatobiliary Phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI?\",\"authors\":\"Chao Wang, Yancheng Song, Zhibin Pan, Guoce Li, Fenghai Liu, Xiaodong Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to verify whether the Liver-to-portal Ratio (LPR) can assess the adequacy of the Hepatobiliary Phase (HBP) for patients with different liver functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 125 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and graded into the non-cirrhosis group (45), Child-Pugh A group (40), and Child- Pugh B/C group (40). The LPR on HBP was calculated after eight HBPs were obtained within 5-40 minutes. The adequate HBP was determined according to the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus statement. The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were analyzed by paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. The chisquare test was used to test the difference in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were significant in Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B/C groups (P < 0.05), except for the non-cirrhosis group (P > 0.05). The differences in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were not statistically significant in all groups (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adequate HBP obtained according to the 2016 ESGAR consensus statement could provide larger LPR and better lesions' conspicuity than 10- min HBP, especially for cirrhotic patients; however, the efficacy of using an LPR cutoff of 1.462 as the standard of the adequate HBP may be compromised in patients with cirrhosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e15734056318603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056318603240910115315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Whether the Liver-to-Portal Vein Ratio is Applicable for Evaluating the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology Hepatobiliary Phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI?
Purpose: This study aimed to verify whether the Liver-to-portal Ratio (LPR) can assess the adequacy of the Hepatobiliary Phase (HBP) for patients with different liver functions.
Methods: A total of 125 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and graded into the non-cirrhosis group (45), Child-Pugh A group (40), and Child- Pugh B/C group (40). The LPR on HBP was calculated after eight HBPs were obtained within 5-40 minutes. The adequate HBP was determined according to the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus statement. The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were analyzed by paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. The chisquare test was used to test the difference in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP.
Results: The differences in LPR and lesions' conspicuity between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were significant in Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B/C groups (P < 0.05), except for the non-cirrhosis group (P > 0.05). The differences in proportion with LPR larger than 1.462 between 10-min HBP and adequate HBP were not statistically significant in all groups (all P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The adequate HBP obtained according to the 2016 ESGAR consensus statement could provide larger LPR and better lesions' conspicuity than 10- min HBP, especially for cirrhotic patients; however, the efficacy of using an LPR cutoff of 1.462 as the standard of the adequate HBP may be compromised in patients with cirrhosis.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.