瑞士肺科医生和胸外科医生的戒烟援助:一项全国性调查。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1420277
Fabrizio Minervini, Peter Kestenholz, Frank Rassouli, Susanne Pohle, Nora Mayer
{"title":"瑞士肺科医生和胸外科医生的戒烟援助:一项全国性调查。","authors":"Fabrizio Minervini, Peter Kestenholz, Frank Rassouli, Susanne Pohle, Nora Mayer","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1420277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Smoking, with a prevalence of about 25%-30% in Switzerland, is proven to cause major systemic, avoidable diseases including lung cancer, increasing societies morbidity and mortality. Diverse strong quitting smoking recommendations have been made available providing advice facilitating smoking cessation globally. In other European countries like Germany, clinical practice guidelines for smoking cessation services have been implemented. However, in Switzerland, there is still no national consensus on a comprehensive smoking cessation program for lung cancer patients nor on the adequate provider. Our primary aim was to assess the current status of smoking cessation practice among specialists, mainly involved in lung cancer care, in Switzerland in order to uncover potential shortcomings.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A self-designed 14-items questionnaire, which was reviewed and approved by our working group consisting of pneumologists and thoracic surgeons, on demographics of the participants, the status of smoking cessation in Switzerland and specialists' opinion on smoking cessation was sent to thoracic surgeons and pneumologists between January 2024 and March 2024 via the commercially available platform www.surveymonkey.com. Data was collected and analysed with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey response rate was 22.25%. Smoking cessation was felt to positively affect long term survival and perioperative outcome in lung cancer surgery. While 33 (37.08%) physicians were offering smoking cessation themselves usually and always (35.96%), only 12 (13.48%) were always referring their patients for smoking cessation. Patient willingness was clearly identified as main factor for failure of cessation programs by 63 respondents (70.79%). Pneumologists were deemed to be the most adequate specialist to offer smoking cessation (49.44%) in a combination of specialist counselling combined with pharmaceutic support (80.90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The development of Swiss national guidelines for smoking cessation and the implementation of cessation counselling in standardized lung cancer care pathways is warranted in Switzerland to improve long-term survival and perioperative outcome of lung cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1420277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smoking cessation assistance among pneumologists and thoracic surgeons in Switzerland: a national survey.\",\"authors\":\"Fabrizio Minervini, Peter Kestenholz, Frank Rassouli, Susanne Pohle, Nora Mayer\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2024.1420277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Smoking, with a prevalence of about 25%-30% in Switzerland, is proven to cause major systemic, avoidable diseases including lung cancer, increasing societies morbidity and mortality. Diverse strong quitting smoking recommendations have been made available providing advice facilitating smoking cessation globally. In other European countries like Germany, clinical practice guidelines for smoking cessation services have been implemented. However, in Switzerland, there is still no national consensus on a comprehensive smoking cessation program for lung cancer patients nor on the adequate provider. Our primary aim was to assess the current status of smoking cessation practice among specialists, mainly involved in lung cancer care, in Switzerland in order to uncover potential shortcomings.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A self-designed 14-items questionnaire, which was reviewed and approved by our working group consisting of pneumologists and thoracic surgeons, on demographics of the participants, the status of smoking cessation in Switzerland and specialists' opinion on smoking cessation was sent to thoracic surgeons and pneumologists between January 2024 and March 2024 via the commercially available platform www.surveymonkey.com. Data was collected and analysed with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey response rate was 22.25%. Smoking cessation was felt to positively affect long term survival and perioperative outcome in lung cancer surgery. While 33 (37.08%) physicians were offering smoking cessation themselves usually and always (35.96%), only 12 (13.48%) were always referring their patients for smoking cessation. Patient willingness was clearly identified as main factor for failure of cessation programs by 63 respondents (70.79%). Pneumologists were deemed to be the most adequate specialist to offer smoking cessation (49.44%) in a combination of specialist counselling combined with pharmaceutic support (80.90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The development of Swiss national guidelines for smoking cessation and the implementation of cessation counselling in standardized lung cancer care pathways is warranted in Switzerland to improve long-term survival and perioperative outcome of lung cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1420277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445225/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1420277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1420277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:吸烟在瑞士的流行率约为 25%-30%,已被证实会导致包括肺癌在内的重大全身性可避免疾病,增加社会的发病率和死亡率。在全球范围内,已经有各种强有力的戒烟建议,为戒烟提供建议。在德国等其他欧洲国家,已经实施了戒烟服务临床实践指南。然而,在瑞士,对于针对肺癌患者的综合戒烟计划和适当的戒烟服务提供者仍未达成全国性共识。我们的主要目的是评估瑞士主要从事肺癌治疗的专科医生的戒烟实践现状,以发现潜在的不足之处:2024年1月至2024年3月期间,我们通过商用平台www.surveymonkey.com,向胸外科医生和肺科医生发送了一份自行设计的14个项目的调查问卷,问卷内容涉及参与者的人口统计学特征、瑞士的戒烟现状以及专家对戒烟的看法。收集的数据通过描述性统计进行分析:调查回复率为 22.25%。戒烟被认为会对肺癌手术的长期生存和围手术期结果产生积极影响。虽然有 33 名(37.08%)医生通常和总是自己戒烟(35.96%),但只有 12 名(13.48%)医生总是转介病人戒烟。63名受访者(70.79%)明确指出,患者的意愿是导致戒烟计划失败的主要因素。肺科医生被认为是最适合提供戒烟服务的专科医生(49.44%),他们将专科咨询与药物支持相结合(80.90%):结论:瑞士有必要制定戒烟国家指南,并在标准化肺癌治疗路径中实施戒烟咨询,以改善肺癌患者的长期生存和围手术期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smoking cessation assistance among pneumologists and thoracic surgeons in Switzerland: a national survey.

Objective: Smoking, with a prevalence of about 25%-30% in Switzerland, is proven to cause major systemic, avoidable diseases including lung cancer, increasing societies morbidity and mortality. Diverse strong quitting smoking recommendations have been made available providing advice facilitating smoking cessation globally. In other European countries like Germany, clinical practice guidelines for smoking cessation services have been implemented. However, in Switzerland, there is still no national consensus on a comprehensive smoking cessation program for lung cancer patients nor on the adequate provider. Our primary aim was to assess the current status of smoking cessation practice among specialists, mainly involved in lung cancer care, in Switzerland in order to uncover potential shortcomings.

Material and methods: A self-designed 14-items questionnaire, which was reviewed and approved by our working group consisting of pneumologists and thoracic surgeons, on demographics of the participants, the status of smoking cessation in Switzerland and specialists' opinion on smoking cessation was sent to thoracic surgeons and pneumologists between January 2024 and March 2024 via the commercially available platform www.surveymonkey.com. Data was collected and analysed with descriptive statistics.

Results: Survey response rate was 22.25%. Smoking cessation was felt to positively affect long term survival and perioperative outcome in lung cancer surgery. While 33 (37.08%) physicians were offering smoking cessation themselves usually and always (35.96%), only 12 (13.48%) were always referring their patients for smoking cessation. Patient willingness was clearly identified as main factor for failure of cessation programs by 63 respondents (70.79%). Pneumologists were deemed to be the most adequate specialist to offer smoking cessation (49.44%) in a combination of specialist counselling combined with pharmaceutic support (80.90%).

Conclusion: The development of Swiss national guidelines for smoking cessation and the implementation of cessation counselling in standardized lung cancer care pathways is warranted in Switzerland to improve long-term survival and perioperative outcome of lung cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1