{"title":"将中度低体温循环停止作为主动脉夹层的脑保护策略。","authors":"Hodaka Wakisaka, Shunta Miwa, Yuji Matsubayashi, Yotaro Mori, Junghun Lee, Kenichi Kamiya, Noriyuki Takashima, Tomoaki Suzuki","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Brain-protective strategies for acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) remain controversial. Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest (MHCA) without cerebral perfusion is not commonly used. However, we aimed to assess its safety and efficacy in 358 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement with MHCA for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution from August 2012 to August 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcomes were compared according to circulatory arrest time [≤15 min (S group, n = 52) vs ≥16 min (L group, n = 306)]. The primary outcome was postoperative stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The S group had more older patients (72.5 vs 68.8 years; P = 0.04), a greater incidence of carotid artery malperfusion (21% vs 11%; P = 0.043) and a lower body mass index (21.7 vs 23.6 kg/m2; P < 0.01) and hemodynamic instability (3.8% vs 16%; P = 0.02) than the L group. The incidence of postoperative stroke (7.7% vs 12%; P = 0.33) and the rate of 30-day mortality (5.8% vs 6.5%; P = 0.83) did not significantly differ between groups. After adjusting for all potential confounding factors pre- and intraoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MHCA alone for TAAD had comparable postoperative outcomes with circulatory arrest times under and over 15 min. However, longer arrest times were associated with a higher risk of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest as a brain-protective strategy for type A aortic dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Hodaka Wakisaka, Shunta Miwa, Yuji Matsubayashi, Yotaro Mori, Junghun Lee, Kenichi Kamiya, Noriyuki Takashima, Tomoaki Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivae166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Brain-protective strategies for acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) remain controversial. Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest (MHCA) without cerebral perfusion is not commonly used. However, we aimed to assess its safety and efficacy in 358 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement with MHCA for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution from August 2012 to August 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcomes were compared according to circulatory arrest time [≤15 min (S group, n = 52) vs ≥16 min (L group, n = 306)]. The primary outcome was postoperative stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The S group had more older patients (72.5 vs 68.8 years; P = 0.04), a greater incidence of carotid artery malperfusion (21% vs 11%; P = 0.043) and a lower body mass index (21.7 vs 23.6 kg/m2; P < 0.01) and hemodynamic instability (3.8% vs 16%; P = 0.02) than the L group. The incidence of postoperative stroke (7.7% vs 12%; P = 0.33) and the rate of 30-day mortality (5.8% vs 6.5%; P = 0.83) did not significantly differ between groups. After adjusting for all potential confounding factors pre- and intraoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MHCA alone for TAAD had comparable postoperative outcomes with circulatory arrest times under and over 15 min. However, longer arrest times were associated with a higher risk of stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:急性 A 型主动脉夹层(TAAD)的脑保护策略仍存在争议。不进行脑灌注的中度低温循环骤停(MHCA)并不常用。然而,我们的目的是评估2012年8月至2022年8月期间在我院接受半弓置换术和MHCA治疗急性A型主动脉夹层的358名患者的安全性和有效性:根据循环停止时间(≤15 分钟[S 组,n = 52] vs ≥ 16 分钟[L 组,n = 306])比较临床结果。主要结果是术后中风:结果:S 组患者年龄较大(72.5 岁 vs 68.8 岁;P = 0.04),颈动脉灌注不良发生率较高(21% vs 11%;P = 0.043),体重指数较低(21.7 vs 23.6 kg/m2;P 结论:单纯 MHCA 治疗 TAAD 与 L 组相比,术后卒中发生率较低:单纯 MHCA 治疗 TAAD 的术后效果与循环停止时间在 15 分钟以下和 15 分钟以上的患者相当。然而,停跳时间越长,中风风险越高。
Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest as a brain-protective strategy for type A aortic dissection.
Objectives: Brain-protective strategies for acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) remain controversial. Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest (MHCA) without cerebral perfusion is not commonly used. However, we aimed to assess its safety and efficacy in 358 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement with MHCA for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution from August 2012 to August 2022.
Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared according to circulatory arrest time [≤15 min (S group, n = 52) vs ≥16 min (L group, n = 306)]. The primary outcome was postoperative stroke.
Results: The S group had more older patients (72.5 vs 68.8 years; P = 0.04), a greater incidence of carotid artery malperfusion (21% vs 11%; P = 0.043) and a lower body mass index (21.7 vs 23.6 kg/m2; P < 0.01) and hemodynamic instability (3.8% vs 16%; P = 0.02) than the L group. The incidence of postoperative stroke (7.7% vs 12%; P = 0.33) and the rate of 30-day mortality (5.8% vs 6.5%; P = 0.83) did not significantly differ between groups. After adjusting for all potential confounding factors pre- and intraoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups.
Conclusions: MHCA alone for TAAD had comparable postoperative outcomes with circulatory arrest times under and over 15 min. However, longer arrest times were associated with a higher risk of stroke.