将中度低体温循环停止作为主动脉夹层的脑保护策略。

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae166
Hodaka Wakisaka, Shunta Miwa, Yuji Matsubayashi, Yotaro Mori, Junghun Lee, Kenichi Kamiya, Noriyuki Takashima, Tomoaki Suzuki
{"title":"将中度低体温循环停止作为主动脉夹层的脑保护策略。","authors":"Hodaka Wakisaka, Shunta Miwa, Yuji Matsubayashi, Yotaro Mori, Junghun Lee, Kenichi Kamiya, Noriyuki Takashima, Tomoaki Suzuki","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Brain-protective strategies for acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) remain controversial. Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest (MHCA) without cerebral perfusion is not commonly used. However, we aimed to assess its safety and efficacy in 358 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement with MHCA for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution from August 2012 to August 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcomes were compared according to circulatory arrest time [≤15 min (S group, n = 52) vs ≥16 min (L group, n = 306)]. The primary outcome was postoperative stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The S group had more older patients (72.5 vs 68.8 years; P = 0.04), a greater incidence of carotid artery malperfusion (21% vs 11%; P = 0.043) and a lower body mass index (21.7 vs 23.6 kg/m2; P < 0.01) and hemodynamic instability (3.8% vs 16%; P = 0.02) than the L group. The incidence of postoperative stroke (7.7% vs 12%; P = 0.33) and the rate of 30-day mortality (5.8% vs 6.5%; P = 0.83) did not significantly differ between groups. After adjusting for all potential confounding factors pre- and intraoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MHCA alone for TAAD had comparable postoperative outcomes with circulatory arrest times under and over 15 min. However, longer arrest times were associated with a higher risk of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest as a brain-protective strategy for type A aortic dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Hodaka Wakisaka, Shunta Miwa, Yuji Matsubayashi, Yotaro Mori, Junghun Lee, Kenichi Kamiya, Noriyuki Takashima, Tomoaki Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivae166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Brain-protective strategies for acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) remain controversial. Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest (MHCA) without cerebral perfusion is not commonly used. However, we aimed to assess its safety and efficacy in 358 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement with MHCA for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution from August 2012 to August 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcomes were compared according to circulatory arrest time [≤15 min (S group, n = 52) vs ≥16 min (L group, n = 306)]. The primary outcome was postoperative stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The S group had more older patients (72.5 vs 68.8 years; P = 0.04), a greater incidence of carotid artery malperfusion (21% vs 11%; P = 0.043) and a lower body mass index (21.7 vs 23.6 kg/m2; P < 0.01) and hemodynamic instability (3.8% vs 16%; P = 0.02) than the L group. The incidence of postoperative stroke (7.7% vs 12%; P = 0.33) and the rate of 30-day mortality (5.8% vs 6.5%; P = 0.83) did not significantly differ between groups. After adjusting for all potential confounding factors pre- and intraoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MHCA alone for TAAD had comparable postoperative outcomes with circulatory arrest times under and over 15 min. However, longer arrest times were associated with a higher risk of stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性 A 型主动脉夹层(TAAD)的脑保护策略仍存在争议。不进行脑灌注的中度低温循环骤停(MHCA)并不常用。然而,我们的目的是评估2012年8月至2022年8月期间在我院接受半弓置换术和MHCA治疗急性A型主动脉夹层的358名患者的安全性和有效性:根据循环停止时间(≤15 分钟[S 组,n = 52] vs ≥ 16 分钟[L 组,n = 306])比较临床结果。主要结果是术后中风:结果:S 组患者年龄较大(72.5 岁 vs 68.8 岁;P = 0.04),颈动脉灌注不良发生率较高(21% vs 11%;P = 0.043),体重指数较低(21.7 vs 23.6 kg/m2;P 结论:单纯 MHCA 治疗 TAAD 与 L 组相比,术后卒中发生率较低:单纯 MHCA 治疗 TAAD 的术后效果与循环停止时间在 15 分钟以下和 15 分钟以上的患者相当。然而,停跳时间越长,中风风险越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest as a brain-protective strategy for type A aortic dissection.

Objectives: Brain-protective strategies for acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) remain controversial. Moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest (MHCA) without cerebral perfusion is not commonly used. However, we aimed to assess its safety and efficacy in 358 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement with MHCA for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution from August 2012 to August 2022.

Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared according to circulatory arrest time [≤15 min (S group, n = 52) vs ≥16 min (L group, n = 306)]. The primary outcome was postoperative stroke.

Results: The S group had more older patients (72.5 vs 68.8 years; P = 0.04), a greater incidence of carotid artery malperfusion (21% vs 11%; P = 0.043) and a lower body mass index (21.7 vs 23.6 kg/m2; P < 0.01) and hemodynamic instability (3.8% vs 16%; P = 0.02) than the L group. The incidence of postoperative stroke (7.7% vs 12%; P = 0.33) and the rate of 30-day mortality (5.8% vs 6.5%; P = 0.83) did not significantly differ between groups. After adjusting for all potential confounding factors pre- and intraoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups.

Conclusions: MHCA alone for TAAD had comparable postoperative outcomes with circulatory arrest times under and over 15 min. However, longer arrest times were associated with a higher risk of stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of superior trunk brachial plexus injury after right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve repair. Association between preoperative D-dimer with morphologic features and surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection. Defining the causes for Fontan circulatory failure in total cavopulmonary connection patients. Risk of neurologic events after surgery for mitral valve insufficiency and concomitant cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. A nationwide register-based study. Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a world-first approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1