骨质疏松性骨盆环骨折 OF 骨盆评分的开发与评估--对 107 例患者治疗建议的回顾性评估。

Ulrich Josef Albert Spiegl, Klaus J Schnake, Max J Scheyerer, Thomas Mendel, Georg Osterhoff, Kai Sprengel, Martin Bäumlein, Lars Behr, Alexander Franck, Erol Gercek, Sebastian Grüninger, Philipp Hartung, Stefan Hauck, Cornelius Jacobs, Sebastian Katscher, Friederike Klauke, Katja Liepold, Christian W Müller, Michael Müller, Stefan Piltz, Robert Pätzold, Marion Riehle, Gregor Schmeiser, Akhil P Verheyden, Volker Zimmermann, Bernhard Ullrich
{"title":"骨质疏松性骨盆环骨折 OF 骨盆评分的开发与评估--对 107 例患者治疗建议的回顾性评估。","authors":"Ulrich Josef Albert Spiegl, Klaus J Schnake, Max J Scheyerer, Thomas Mendel, Georg Osterhoff, Kai Sprengel, Martin Bäumlein, Lars Behr, Alexander Franck, Erol Gercek, Sebastian Grüninger, Philipp Hartung, Stefan Hauck, Cornelius Jacobs, Sebastian Katscher, Friederike Klauke, Katja Liepold, Christian W Müller, Michael Müller, Stefan Piltz, Robert Pätzold, Marion Riehle, Gregor Schmeiser, Akhil P Verheyden, Volker Zimmermann, Bernhard Ullrich","doi":"10.1055/a-2385-1747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94274,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures - A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ulrich Josef Albert Spiegl, Klaus J Schnake, Max J Scheyerer, Thomas Mendel, Georg Osterhoff, Kai Sprengel, Martin Bäumlein, Lars Behr, Alexander Franck, Erol Gercek, Sebastian Grüninger, Philipp Hartung, Stefan Hauck, Cornelius Jacobs, Sebastian Katscher, Friederike Klauke, Katja Liepold, Christian W Müller, Michael Müller, Stefan Piltz, Robert Pätzold, Marion Riehle, Gregor Schmeiser, Akhil P Verheyden, Volker Zimmermann, Bernhard Ullrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2385-1747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2385-1747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2385-1747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在开发一种简单可靠的评分方法,为骨质疏松性骨盆骨折患者在非手术治疗和手术治疗之间做出决策提供支持。2018 年至 2020 年间,德国骨科和创伤学会脊柱分会骨质疏松性骨折工作组共召开了 5 次会议,期间开发了 OF 骨盆评分。OF 骨盆评分作为非手术治疗和手术治疗之间的辅助决策工具,是在对多家医院的大量老年骶骨和骨盆环骨折进行分析后,经专家一致同意制定的。以下参数被认为与非手术治疗和手术治疗之间的决策相关,并被纳入评分中:使用 OF 骨盆分类的骨折形态、疼痛状况、活动程度、骨折相关的神经功能缺损、健康状况以及已纳入 OF 骨盆分类的修饰符。如果得分是 8 分,则建议进行手术治疗;如果得分是 8 分,则有相对的手术指征。然后,根据记录对总共 107 名患者的 OF 骨盆评分进行了回顾性评估。有 4 名患者(3.7%)的 OF 骨盆评分为 8 分,他们都接受了手术治疗。其余 103 名患者中,93 人接受了符合评分标准的治疗(占 90.3%)。其中,4 名未接受符合评分标准治疗的患者拒绝接受建议的手术,因此实际治疗建议符合评分标准的患者占 94.2%。在临床实践中,OF 骨盆评分可用于为许多患者得出治疗建议。由于临床参数在病程中可能发生变化,因此该评分具有动态特性。在回顾性评估中,OF 骨盆评分的建议与实际实施的治疗密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures - A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients.

The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coiling of a Postinterventional Pseudoaneurysm After Distal Locking of a Proximal Femoral Nail. [Transtuberositary, Anterior Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (TT-AOW-HTO) to Correct a Negative Slope]. GeriNOT in the Surgical Inpatient Setting. Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures - A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients. Comparison of Pre- and Postoperative Motor-proprioceptive Abilities in Patients with Gonarthrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1