Jungsoo Lee, Youngbeom Kim, Kihyuk Shin, Hoon-Soo Kim, Hyun-Chang Ko, Moon-Bum Kim, Byung-Soo Kim
{"title":"用乌达帕替尼治疗难治性结节性瘙痒症:前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Jungsoo Lee, Youngbeom Kim, Kihyuk Shin, Hoon-Soo Kim, Hyun-Chang Ko, Moon-Bum Kim, Byung-Soo Kim","doi":"10.4168/aair.2024.16.5.546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic neuroinflammatory dermatosis with severe pruritus that has limited efficacy in various conventional treatments. This study investigated the outcomes of upadacitinib treatment in patients with refractory PN. A prospective study was conducted to screen for potential chronic infections prior to treatment. Upadacitinib was administered at a daily dose of 15 mg for 24 weeks, and the treatment response was assessed using the itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Adverse events were monitored at each visit. Ten patients, with an average age of 48.8 years, were included in the study. All participants were treated with systemic cyclosporine before receiving upadacitinib, which yielded limited responses. At baseline, the mean prurigo severity scores assessed using the IGA, DLQI, and itch NRS were 3.4, 17.8, and 8.1, respectively; after 24 weeks of treatment, these scores significantly reduced to 1.0, 0.6, and 0.8, respectively. No severe adverse effects were observed. In conclusion, upadacitinib could be considered an alternative therapeutic option with good tolerability for refractory PN.</p>","PeriodicalId":7547,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","volume":"16 5","pages":"546-554"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment With Upadacitinib in Refractory Prurigo Nodularis: A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jungsoo Lee, Youngbeom Kim, Kihyuk Shin, Hoon-Soo Kim, Hyun-Chang Ko, Moon-Bum Kim, Byung-Soo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4168/aair.2024.16.5.546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic neuroinflammatory dermatosis with severe pruritus that has limited efficacy in various conventional treatments. This study investigated the outcomes of upadacitinib treatment in patients with refractory PN. A prospective study was conducted to screen for potential chronic infections prior to treatment. Upadacitinib was administered at a daily dose of 15 mg for 24 weeks, and the treatment response was assessed using the itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Adverse events were monitored at each visit. Ten patients, with an average age of 48.8 years, were included in the study. All participants were treated with systemic cyclosporine before receiving upadacitinib, which yielded limited responses. At baseline, the mean prurigo severity scores assessed using the IGA, DLQI, and itch NRS were 3.4, 17.8, and 8.1, respectively; after 24 weeks of treatment, these scores significantly reduced to 1.0, 0.6, and 0.8, respectively. No severe adverse effects were observed. In conclusion, upadacitinib could be considered an alternative therapeutic option with good tolerability for refractory PN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"546-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2024.16.5.546\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2024.16.5.546","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment With Upadacitinib in Refractory Prurigo Nodularis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic neuroinflammatory dermatosis with severe pruritus that has limited efficacy in various conventional treatments. This study investigated the outcomes of upadacitinib treatment in patients with refractory PN. A prospective study was conducted to screen for potential chronic infections prior to treatment. Upadacitinib was administered at a daily dose of 15 mg for 24 weeks, and the treatment response was assessed using the itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Adverse events were monitored at each visit. Ten patients, with an average age of 48.8 years, were included in the study. All participants were treated with systemic cyclosporine before receiving upadacitinib, which yielded limited responses. At baseline, the mean prurigo severity scores assessed using the IGA, DLQI, and itch NRS were 3.4, 17.8, and 8.1, respectively; after 24 weeks of treatment, these scores significantly reduced to 1.0, 0.6, and 0.8, respectively. No severe adverse effects were observed. In conclusion, upadacitinib could be considered an alternative therapeutic option with good tolerability for refractory PN.
期刊介绍:
The journal features cutting-edge original research, brief communications, and state-of-the-art reviews in the specialties of allergy, asthma, and immunology, including clinical and experimental studies and instructive case reports. Contemporary reviews summarize information on topics for researchers and physicians in the fields of allergy and immunology. As of January 2017, AAIR do not accept case reports. However, if it is a clinically important case, authors can submit it in the form of letter to the Editor. Editorials and letters to the Editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion among physicians dealing with allergy, immunology, pediatric respirology, and related medical fields. AAIR also features topics in practice and management and recent advances in equipment and techniques for clinicians concerned with clinical manifestations of allergies and pediatric respiratory diseases.