用 Oculus Keratograph 5M 和 IDRA 眼表分析仪评估泪膜功能。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY International Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1007/s10792-024-03262-y
Jiajia Wang, Yan Shen, Xingtao Zhou, Zhiqiang Yu, Jiaxu Hong, Qihua Le
{"title":"用 Oculus Keratograph 5M 和 IDRA 眼表分析仪评估泪膜功能。","authors":"Jiajia Wang, Yan Shen, Xingtao Zhou, Zhiqiang Yu, Jiaxu Hong, Qihua Le","doi":"10.1007/s10792-024-03262-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the function of tear film with Oculus Keratograph 5M (Oculus K5M) and IDRA ocular surface analyser (IDRA), analyse their consistency and explore the potential of IDRA in the diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled 36 participants (DED group, 14 eyes; non-DED group, 22 eyes). The parameters of tear film function, including the first noninvasive breakup time (fNIBUT), average NIBUT (aNIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), lipid layer thickness (LLT), lipid layer colour (LLC), lipid layer uniformity (LLU), morphology of meibomian glands (MGs) and MG loss, were obtained with Oculus K5M and IDRA. The consistency of parameter measurements between the two devices was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the parameters except LLT, which can be measured only by IDRA, were not significantly different between the two instruments in DED eyes. However, IDRA reported lower values of fNIBUT, aNIBUT and TMH as well as higher MG loss scores in non-DED eyes than Oculus K5M did (p < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.002, and = 0.002, respectively). Further regression analysis revealed that aNIBUT and LLT measured by IDRA were the optimal parameters for diagnosing DED (OR = 0.567 and 0.845, p = 0.057 and 0.043, respectively), and their combination had the strongest diagnostic potential (AUC = 0.841, sensitivity = 85.7%, and specificity = 77.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a user-friendly noninvasive device, the tear film function parameters measured by IDRA were highly consistent with those measured by Oculus K5M in DED patients. The combination of aNIBUT and LLT measured by IDRA had the best diagnostic accuracy for DED.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of tear film function by Oculus Keratograph 5M and IDRA ocular surface analyser.\",\"authors\":\"Jiajia Wang, Yan Shen, Xingtao Zhou, Zhiqiang Yu, Jiaxu Hong, Qihua Le\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10792-024-03262-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the function of tear film with Oculus Keratograph 5M (Oculus K5M) and IDRA ocular surface analyser (IDRA), analyse their consistency and explore the potential of IDRA in the diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled 36 participants (DED group, 14 eyes; non-DED group, 22 eyes). The parameters of tear film function, including the first noninvasive breakup time (fNIBUT), average NIBUT (aNIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), lipid layer thickness (LLT), lipid layer colour (LLC), lipid layer uniformity (LLU), morphology of meibomian glands (MGs) and MG loss, were obtained with Oculus K5M and IDRA. The consistency of parameter measurements between the two devices was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the parameters except LLT, which can be measured only by IDRA, were not significantly different between the two instruments in DED eyes. However, IDRA reported lower values of fNIBUT, aNIBUT and TMH as well as higher MG loss scores in non-DED eyes than Oculus K5M did (p < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.002, and = 0.002, respectively). Further regression analysis revealed that aNIBUT and LLT measured by IDRA were the optimal parameters for diagnosing DED (OR = 0.567 and 0.845, p = 0.057 and 0.043, respectively), and their combination had the strongest diagnostic potential (AUC = 0.841, sensitivity = 85.7%, and specificity = 77.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a user-friendly noninvasive device, the tear film function parameters measured by IDRA were highly consistent with those measured by Oculus K5M in DED patients. The combination of aNIBUT and LLT measured by IDRA had the best diagnostic accuracy for DED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03262-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03262-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在使用 Oculus Keratograph 5M (Oculus K5M) 和 IDRA 眼表分析仪 (IDRA) 评估泪膜功能,分析其一致性,并探索 IDRA 在诊断干眼症 (DED) 方面的潜力:这项横断面研究共招募了 36 名参与者(干眼症组 14 眼;非干眼症组 22 眼)。使用 Oculus K5M 和 IDRA 获得了泪膜功能参数,包括第一次无创破裂时间(fNIBUT)、平均无创破裂时间(aNIBUT)、泪液半月板高度(TMH)、脂质层厚度(LLT)、脂质层颜色(LLC)、脂质层均匀性(LLU)、睑板腺形态(MGs)和睑板腺损失。评估了两种设备参数测量的一致性:结果:在 DED 眼中,除 LLT 只能由 IDRA 测量外,其他所有参数在两种仪器之间均无显著差异。然而,与 Oculus K5M 相比,IDRA 报告的非 DED 眼的 fNIBUT、aNIBUT 和 TMH 值较低,MG 损失评分较高(p 结论:IDRA 作为一种用户友好型无创眼科设备,其测量结果与 Oculus K5M 相似:作为一种用户友好型无创设备,IDRA 在 DED 患者中测量的泪膜功能参数与 Oculus K5M 测量的参数高度一致。IDRA 测量的 aNIBUT 和 LLT 组合对 DED 的诊断准确性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of tear film function by Oculus Keratograph 5M and IDRA ocular surface analyser.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the function of tear film with Oculus Keratograph 5M (Oculus K5M) and IDRA ocular surface analyser (IDRA), analyse their consistency and explore the potential of IDRA in the diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED).

Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 36 participants (DED group, 14 eyes; non-DED group, 22 eyes). The parameters of tear film function, including the first noninvasive breakup time (fNIBUT), average NIBUT (aNIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), lipid layer thickness (LLT), lipid layer colour (LLC), lipid layer uniformity (LLU), morphology of meibomian glands (MGs) and MG loss, were obtained with Oculus K5M and IDRA. The consistency of parameter measurements between the two devices was evaluated.

Results: All the parameters except LLT, which can be measured only by IDRA, were not significantly different between the two instruments in DED eyes. However, IDRA reported lower values of fNIBUT, aNIBUT and TMH as well as higher MG loss scores in non-DED eyes than Oculus K5M did (p < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.002, and = 0.002, respectively). Further regression analysis revealed that aNIBUT and LLT measured by IDRA were the optimal parameters for diagnosing DED (OR = 0.567 and 0.845, p = 0.057 and 0.043, respectively), and their combination had the strongest diagnostic potential (AUC = 0.841, sensitivity = 85.7%, and specificity = 77.3%).

Conclusion: As a user-friendly noninvasive device, the tear film function parameters measured by IDRA were highly consistent with those measured by Oculus K5M in DED patients. The combination of aNIBUT and LLT measured by IDRA had the best diagnostic accuracy for DED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Retinal vasculature changes in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. Performance of Chatgpt in ophthalmology exam; human versus AI. Unveiling macular displacement: endotamponade variations in retinal detachment repair outcomes. A small disc size, a big challenge: effect of optic disc size on the correlation between peripapillary choroidal thickness, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell layer. Clinical profile and etiological spectrum of patients presenting with corneal hydrops over a 12-year period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1