过去十年微创脊柱手术的并发症:叙述性回顾。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurospine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2448652.326
Blake I Boadi, Chibuikem Anthony Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Rachel Bratescu, Mazin Omer, Osama N Kashlan, Galal Elsayed, Roger Härtl
{"title":"过去十年微创脊柱手术的并发症:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Blake I Boadi, Chibuikem Anthony Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Rachel Bratescu, Mazin Omer, Osama N Kashlan, Galal Elsayed, Roger Härtl","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448652.326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) employs small incisions and advanced techniques to minimize tissue damage while achieving similar outcomes to open surgery. MISS offers benefits such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. This review analyzes complications associated with MISS over the last 10 years, highlighting common issues and the impact of technological advancements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase via OVID, and Cochrane databases, covering publications from January 2013 to March 2024. Keywords related to MISS and complications were used. Studies on adult patients undergoing MISS with tubular, uniportal, or biportal endoscopy, reporting intraoperative or postoperative complications, were included. Non-English publications, abstracts, and small case series were excluded. Data on MISS approach, patient demographics, and complications were extracted and reviewed by 2 independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 880 studies, with 137 included after screening and exclusions. Key complications in cervical MISS were hematomas, transient nerve root palsy, and dural tears. In thoracic MISS, complications included cerebrospinal fluid leaks and durotomy. In lumbar MISS, common complications were incidental dural injuries, postoperative neuropathic conditions, and disc herniation recurrences. Complications varied by surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MISS offers reduced anatomical disruption compared to open surgery, potentially decreasing nerve injury risk. However, complications such as nerve injuries, durotomies, and hardware misplacement still occur. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and advanced technologies like navigation can help mitigate these risks. Despite variability in complication rates, MISS remains a safe, effective alternative with ongoing advancements enhancing its outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":"21 3","pages":"770-803"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Blake I Boadi, Chibuikem Anthony Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Rachel Bratescu, Mazin Omer, Osama N Kashlan, Galal Elsayed, Roger Härtl\",\"doi\":\"10.14245/ns.2448652.326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) employs small incisions and advanced techniques to minimize tissue damage while achieving similar outcomes to open surgery. MISS offers benefits such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. This review analyzes complications associated with MISS over the last 10 years, highlighting common issues and the impact of technological advancements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase via OVID, and Cochrane databases, covering publications from January 2013 to March 2024. Keywords related to MISS and complications were used. Studies on adult patients undergoing MISS with tubular, uniportal, or biportal endoscopy, reporting intraoperative or postoperative complications, were included. Non-English publications, abstracts, and small case series were excluded. Data on MISS approach, patient demographics, and complications were extracted and reviewed by 2 independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 880 studies, with 137 included after screening and exclusions. Key complications in cervical MISS were hematomas, transient nerve root palsy, and dural tears. In thoracic MISS, complications included cerebrospinal fluid leaks and durotomy. In lumbar MISS, common complications were incidental dural injuries, postoperative neuropathic conditions, and disc herniation recurrences. Complications varied by surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MISS offers reduced anatomical disruption compared to open surgery, potentially decreasing nerve injury risk. However, complications such as nerve injuries, durotomies, and hardware misplacement still occur. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and advanced technologies like navigation can help mitigate these risks. Despite variability in complication rates, MISS remains a safe, effective alternative with ongoing advancements enhancing its outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurospine\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"770-803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurospine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448652.326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448652.326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:微创脊柱手术(MISS)采用小切口和先进技术,最大限度地减少组织损伤,同时达到与开放手术相似的效果。微创手术具有减少失血、缩短住院时间和降低成本等优点。本综述分析了过去 10 年中与 MISS 相关的并发症,强调了常见问题和技术进步的影响:按照 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析首选报告项目)指南,使用 PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase via OVID 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了系统综述,涵盖了 2013 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月期间的出版物。研究使用了与 MISS 和并发症相关的关键词。研究对象包括接受管式、单孔或双孔内窥镜 MISS 的成年患者,并报告了术中或术后并发症。非英语出版物、摘要和小型病例系列被排除在外。有关 MISS 方法、患者人口统计学和并发症的数据由两名独立研究人员提取和审查:结果:搜索共发现了 880 项研究,经筛选和排除后纳入了 137 项。颈部 MISS 的主要并发症是血肿、一过性神经根麻痹和硬膜撕裂。胸部 MISS 的并发症包括脑脊液漏和硬脑膜撕裂。在腰椎MISS手术中,常见的并发症是硬膜意外损伤、术后神经病理性症状和椎间盘突出症复发。并发症因手术方式而异:结论:与开腹手术相比,MISS 可减少解剖结构的破坏,从而降低神经损伤的风险。结论:与开腹手术相比,MISS 减少了对解剖结构的破坏,潜在地降低了神经损伤的风险,但神经损伤、颅骨切开和硬件错位等并发症仍时有发生。术中神经监测和导航等先进技术有助于降低这些风险。尽管并发症发生率存在差异,但 MISS 仍然是一种安全、有效的替代方法,而且其成果也在不断进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review.

Objective: Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) employs small incisions and advanced techniques to minimize tissue damage while achieving similar outcomes to open surgery. MISS offers benefits such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. This review analyzes complications associated with MISS over the last 10 years, highlighting common issues and the impact of technological advancements.

Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase via OVID, and Cochrane databases, covering publications from January 2013 to March 2024. Keywords related to MISS and complications were used. Studies on adult patients undergoing MISS with tubular, uniportal, or biportal endoscopy, reporting intraoperative or postoperative complications, were included. Non-English publications, abstracts, and small case series were excluded. Data on MISS approach, patient demographics, and complications were extracted and reviewed by 2 independent researchers.

Results: The search identified 880 studies, with 137 included after screening and exclusions. Key complications in cervical MISS were hematomas, transient nerve root palsy, and dural tears. In thoracic MISS, complications included cerebrospinal fluid leaks and durotomy. In lumbar MISS, common complications were incidental dural injuries, postoperative neuropathic conditions, and disc herniation recurrences. Complications varied by surgical approach.

Conclusion: MISS offers reduced anatomical disruption compared to open surgery, potentially decreasing nerve injury risk. However, complications such as nerve injuries, durotomies, and hardware misplacement still occur. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and advanced technologies like navigation can help mitigate these risks. Despite variability in complication rates, MISS remains a safe, effective alternative with ongoing advancements enhancing its outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Self-Developed Mobility Augmented Reality System Versus Conventional X-rays for Spine Positioning in Intraspinal Tumor Surgery: A Case-Control Study. An Experimental Model for Fluid Dynamics and Pressures During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. Application of the "Klotski Technique" in Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With En Bloc Type Dura Ossification. Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models. Biomechanical Study of Atlanto-occipital Instability in Type II Basilar Invagination: A Finite Element Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1