MR、CT 和 PET/CT 对食道癌大体肿瘤体积划分的观察者间差异。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.2478/raon-2024-0043
Ajra Secerov-Ermenc, Primoz Peterlin, Franc Anderluh, Jasna But-Hadzic, Ana Jeromen-Peressutti, Vaneja Velenik, Barbara Segedin
{"title":"MR、CT 和 PET/CT 对食道癌大体肿瘤体积划分的观察者间差异。","authors":"Ajra Secerov-Ermenc, Primoz Peterlin, Franc Anderluh, Jasna But-Hadzic, Ana Jeromen-Peressutti, Vaneja Velenik, Barbara Segedin","doi":"10.2478/raon-2024-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of our study was to assess the inter-observer variability in delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) of oesophageal cancer on magnetic resonance (MR) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-three consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy were enrolled. All patients had PET/CT and MR imaging in treatment position. Five observers independently delineated the GTV on CT alone, MR alone, CT with co-registered MR, PET/CT alone and MR with co-registered PET/CT. Volumes of GTV were measured per patient and imaging modality. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index (CIgen), volumetric conformity index (VCI), planar conformity index (PCI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were calculated per patient and imaging modality. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GTV volume was significantly lower on MR (33.03 cm<sup>3</sup>) compared to CT (37.1 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.002) and on PET/CT MR (35.2 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.018) compared to PET/CT (39.1 cm<sup>3</sup>). The CIgen was lowest on CT (0.56) and highest on PET/CT MR (0.67). The difference in CIgen between MR (0.61) and CT was borderline significant (p = 0.048). The VCI was significantly higher on MR (0.71; p = 0.007) and on CT MR (0.71; p = 0.004) compared to CT (0.67). The PCI was significantly higher on CT MR (0.67; p = 0.031) compared to CT (0.64). The largest differences were observed in the cranio-caudal direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest inter-observer agreement was found for PET/CT MR and the lowest for CT. MR could reduce the difference in delineation between observers and provide additional information about the local extent of the tumour.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-observer variation in gross tumour volume delineation of oesophageal cancer on MR, CT and PET/CT.\",\"authors\":\"Ajra Secerov-Ermenc, Primoz Peterlin, Franc Anderluh, Jasna But-Hadzic, Ana Jeromen-Peressutti, Vaneja Velenik, Barbara Segedin\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/raon-2024-0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of our study was to assess the inter-observer variability in delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) of oesophageal cancer on magnetic resonance (MR) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-three consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy were enrolled. All patients had PET/CT and MR imaging in treatment position. Five observers independently delineated the GTV on CT alone, MR alone, CT with co-registered MR, PET/CT alone and MR with co-registered PET/CT. Volumes of GTV were measured per patient and imaging modality. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index (CIgen), volumetric conformity index (VCI), planar conformity index (PCI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were calculated per patient and imaging modality. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GTV volume was significantly lower on MR (33.03 cm<sup>3</sup>) compared to CT (37.1 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.002) and on PET/CT MR (35.2 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.018) compared to PET/CT (39.1 cm<sup>3</sup>). The CIgen was lowest on CT (0.56) and highest on PET/CT MR (0.67). The difference in CIgen between MR (0.61) and CT was borderline significant (p = 0.048). The VCI was significantly higher on MR (0.71; p = 0.007) and on CT MR (0.71; p = 0.004) compared to CT (0.67). The PCI was significantly higher on CT MR (0.67; p = 0.031) compared to CT (0.64). The largest differences were observed in the cranio-caudal direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest inter-observer agreement was found for PET/CT MR and the lowest for CT. MR could reduce the difference in delineation between observers and provide additional information about the local extent of the tumour.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景我们的研究旨在评估磁共振成像(MR)与计算机断层扫描(CT)、正电子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在食道癌总肿瘤体积(GTV)划分上的观察者间差异性:连续 23 例接受放化疗的食道癌患者。所有患者都在治疗位置接受了 PET/CT 和 MR 成像检查。五名观察者分别独立地在单独 CT、单独 MR、CT 与联合成像 MR、单独 PET/CT 和 MR 与联合成像 PET/CT 上划分 GTV。对每位患者和每种成像模式的 GTV 体积进行了测量。以广义符合性指数(CIgen)、容积符合性指数(VCI)、平面符合性指数(PCI)和划线间距(IDD)表示的观察者间一致性按患者和成像模式进行计算。统计分析采用线性混合模型:结果:MR(33.03 cm3)的 GTV 体积明显低于 CT(37.1 cm3; p = 0.002),PET/CT MR(35.2 cm3; p = 0.018)的 GTV 体积明显低于 PET/CT(39.1 cm3)。CT 的 CIgen 最低(0.56),PET/CT MR 的 CIgen 最高(0.67)。MR(0.61)和 CT 的 CIgen 差异具有边缘显著性(p = 0.048)。与 CT(0.67)相比,MR(0.71;p = 0.007)和 CT MR(0.71;p = 0.004)的 VCI 明显更高。与 CT(0.64)相比,CT MR(0.67;p = 0.031)的 PCI 明显更高。颅尾方向的差异最大:结论:PET/CT MR 的观察者间一致性最高,CT 最低。MR 可减少观察者之间的划界差异,并提供有关肿瘤局部范围的更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-observer variation in gross tumour volume delineation of oesophageal cancer on MR, CT and PET/CT.

Background: The aim of our study was to assess the inter-observer variability in delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) of oesophageal cancer on magnetic resonance (MR) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT).

Patients and methods: Twenty-three consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy were enrolled. All patients had PET/CT and MR imaging in treatment position. Five observers independently delineated the GTV on CT alone, MR alone, CT with co-registered MR, PET/CT alone and MR with co-registered PET/CT. Volumes of GTV were measured per patient and imaging modality. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index (CIgen), volumetric conformity index (VCI), planar conformity index (PCI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were calculated per patient and imaging modality. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis.

Results: GTV volume was significantly lower on MR (33.03 cm3) compared to CT (37.1 cm3; p = 0.002) and on PET/CT MR (35.2 cm3; p = 0.018) compared to PET/CT (39.1 cm3). The CIgen was lowest on CT (0.56) and highest on PET/CT MR (0.67). The difference in CIgen between MR (0.61) and CT was borderline significant (p = 0.048). The VCI was significantly higher on MR (0.71; p = 0.007) and on CT MR (0.71; p = 0.004) compared to CT (0.67). The PCI was significantly higher on CT MR (0.67; p = 0.031) compared to CT (0.64). The largest differences were observed in the cranio-caudal direction.

Conclusions: The highest inter-observer agreement was found for PET/CT MR and the lowest for CT. MR could reduce the difference in delineation between observers and provide additional information about the local extent of the tumour.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of early diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer in Slovenia. Assessment of chemical-shift and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant and benign vertebral lesions in oncologic patients. A single institution experience. Characteristics of exposure to radioactive iodine during a nuclear incident. Inter-observer variation in gross tumour volume delineation of oesophageal cancer on MR, CT and PET/CT. Posterior interosseous nerve lesion due to lipoma. Review of the literature and rare case presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1