验证脊柱转移预后指数(PRISM)对脊柱立体定向体放射治疗患者生存率的分层作用。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110570
Marcus A. Florez , Brian De , Roman Kowalchuk , Chad Tang , Andrew J. Bishop , Ramez Kouzy , Behrang Amini , Tina Briere , Thomas H. Beckham , Chenyang Wang , Jing Li , Claudio E. Tatsui , Laurence D. Rhines , Paul D. Brown , Kenneth Merrell , Amol J. Ghia
{"title":"验证脊柱转移预后指数(PRISM)对脊柱立体定向体放射治疗患者生存率的分层作用。","authors":"Marcus A. Florez ,&nbsp;Brian De ,&nbsp;Roman Kowalchuk ,&nbsp;Chad Tang ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Bishop ,&nbsp;Ramez Kouzy ,&nbsp;Behrang Amini ,&nbsp;Tina Briere ,&nbsp;Thomas H. Beckham ,&nbsp;Chenyang Wang ,&nbsp;Jing Li ,&nbsp;Claudio E. Tatsui ,&nbsp;Laurence D. Rhines ,&nbsp;Paul D. Brown ,&nbsp;Kenneth Merrell ,&nbsp;Amol J. Ghia","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Prognostic Index for Spinal Metastasis (PRISM) is a scoring system derived from prospective data from a single institution that stratifies patients undergoing spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) for spinal metastases into subgroups by overall (OS). We sought to further demonstrate its generalizability by performing validation with a large dataset from a second high-volume institution, Mayo Clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>Eight hundred seventy-nine patients—424 from Mayo Clinic and 455 from MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC)—who received SSRS between 2007 and 2019 were identified. Patients were stratified by PRISM criteria, and overall survival (OS) for the PRISM groups for each cohort was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimations and univariate Cox proportional analyses. Model calibration and concordance indices (C-indices) were calculated for each cohort to assess the quality of the scoring system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patient and tumor characteristics varied significantly between both cohorts including histology, sex, performance status, and number of organs involved (all <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001). Median OS was 30.3 and 22.1 months for the Mayo and MDACC cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed robust separation between prognostic groups within both cohorts. The Mayo cohort showed median OS of 57.1, 37.0, 23.7, and 8.8 months for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed hazard ratios of 3.0 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.9–4.9), 5.2 (95 % CI, 3.2–8.3), and 12.9 (95 % CI, 7.8–21.4) for groups 2, 3 and 4, respectively all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The C-indices were 0.69 and 0.66 for the unstratified and stratified scores for the Mayo cohort, and 0.70 and 0.68 for the MDACC cohort, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These data demonstrate robust validation of the PRISM score to stratify OS in patients treated with SSRS by a large external cohort, despite substantial differences among the cohorts. Overall, the PRISM scoring may help guide optimal treatment selection for patients with spine metastases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 110570"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the prognostic index for spine metastasis (PRISM) for stratifying survival in patients treated with spinal stereotactic body radiation\",\"authors\":\"Marcus A. Florez ,&nbsp;Brian De ,&nbsp;Roman Kowalchuk ,&nbsp;Chad Tang ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Bishop ,&nbsp;Ramez Kouzy ,&nbsp;Behrang Amini ,&nbsp;Tina Briere ,&nbsp;Thomas H. Beckham ,&nbsp;Chenyang Wang ,&nbsp;Jing Li ,&nbsp;Claudio E. Tatsui ,&nbsp;Laurence D. Rhines ,&nbsp;Paul D. Brown ,&nbsp;Kenneth Merrell ,&nbsp;Amol J. Ghia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Prognostic Index for Spinal Metastasis (PRISM) is a scoring system derived from prospective data from a single institution that stratifies patients undergoing spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) for spinal metastases into subgroups by overall (OS). We sought to further demonstrate its generalizability by performing validation with a large dataset from a second high-volume institution, Mayo Clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>Eight hundred seventy-nine patients—424 from Mayo Clinic and 455 from MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC)—who received SSRS between 2007 and 2019 were identified. Patients were stratified by PRISM criteria, and overall survival (OS) for the PRISM groups for each cohort was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimations and univariate Cox proportional analyses. Model calibration and concordance indices (C-indices) were calculated for each cohort to assess the quality of the scoring system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patient and tumor characteristics varied significantly between both cohorts including histology, sex, performance status, and number of organs involved (all <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001). Median OS was 30.3 and 22.1 months for the Mayo and MDACC cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed robust separation between prognostic groups within both cohorts. The Mayo cohort showed median OS of 57.1, 37.0, 23.7, and 8.8 months for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed hazard ratios of 3.0 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.9–4.9), 5.2 (95 % CI, 3.2–8.3), and 12.9 (95 % CI, 7.8–21.4) for groups 2, 3 and 4, respectively all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The C-indices were 0.69 and 0.66 for the unstratified and stratified scores for the Mayo cohort, and 0.70 and 0.68 for the MDACC cohort, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These data demonstrate robust validation of the PRISM score to stratify OS in patients treated with SSRS by a large external cohort, despite substantial differences among the cohorts. Overall, the PRISM scoring may help guide optimal treatment selection for patients with spine metastases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035485\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脊柱转移预后指数(PRISM)是一个评分系统,它来自于一家机构的前瞻性数据,可将接受脊柱立体定向放射外科手术(SSRS)治疗脊柱转移的患者按总体(OS)分为不同的亚组。我们试图利用第二家高容量机构梅奥诊所的大型数据集进行验证,以进一步证明该方法的普适性:我们确定了2007年至2019年期间接受SSRS治疗的879名患者(梅奥诊所424名,MD安德森癌症中心(MDACC)455名)。根据PRISM标准对患者进行分层,并使用Kaplan-Meier估计和单变量Cox比例分析比较每个队列中PRISM组的总生存期(OS)。计算了每个队列的模型校准和一致性指数(C-indices),以评估评分系统的质量:结果:两个队列的患者和肿瘤特征存在显著差异,包括组织学、性别、表现状态和受累器官数量(均为 P):这些数据表明,尽管各队列之间存在很大差异,但PRISM评分在对接受SSRS治疗的患者进行OS分层方面得到了大量外部队列的有力验证。总体而言,PRISM 评分有助于指导脊柱转移患者的最佳治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the prognostic index for spine metastasis (PRISM) for stratifying survival in patients treated with spinal stereotactic body radiation

Purpose

The Prognostic Index for Spinal Metastasis (PRISM) is a scoring system derived from prospective data from a single institution that stratifies patients undergoing spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) for spinal metastases into subgroups by overall (OS). We sought to further demonstrate its generalizability by performing validation with a large dataset from a second high-volume institution, Mayo Clinic.

Methods and materials

Eight hundred seventy-nine patients—424 from Mayo Clinic and 455 from MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC)—who received SSRS between 2007 and 2019 were identified. Patients were stratified by PRISM criteria, and overall survival (OS) for the PRISM groups for each cohort was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimations and univariate Cox proportional analyses. Model calibration and concordance indices (C-indices) were calculated for each cohort to assess the quality of the scoring system.

Results

Patient and tumor characteristics varied significantly between both cohorts including histology, sex, performance status, and number of organs involved (all P < 0.001). Median OS was 30.3 and 22.1 months for the Mayo and MDACC cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed robust separation between prognostic groups within both cohorts. The Mayo cohort showed median OS of 57.1, 37.0, 23.7, and 8.8 months for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed hazard ratios of 3.0 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.9–4.9), 5.2 (95 % CI, 3.2–8.3), and 12.9 (95 % CI, 7.8–21.4) for groups 2, 3 and 4, respectively all P < 0.001). The C-indices were 0.69 and 0.66 for the unstratified and stratified scores for the Mayo cohort, and 0.70 and 0.68 for the MDACC cohort, respectively.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate robust validation of the PRISM score to stratify OS in patients treated with SSRS by a large external cohort, despite substantial differences among the cohorts. Overall, the PRISM scoring may help guide optimal treatment selection for patients with spine metastases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
A critical reflection of radiotherapy on osseous free flaps in mandibular segmental resection and immediate reconstruction in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cohort study Intensity-modulated proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated ARC therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A long-term, multicenter cohort study. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Contents International collaboration of neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: The INTERNEO individual patient data pooled analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1