歌唱嗓音障碍指数-10 最小临床意义差异:前瞻性测定。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1002/lary.31808
Claire E Perrin, VyVy N Young, Yue Ma, Clark A Rosen, Steven D Stockton, Sarah L Schneider
{"title":"歌唱嗓音障碍指数-10 最小临床意义差异:前瞻性测定。","authors":"Claire E Perrin, VyVy N Young, Yue Ma, Clark A Rosen, Steven D Stockton, Sarah L Schneider","doi":"10.1002/lary.31808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 (SVHI-10) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that assesses patients' perception of handicap related to singing voice. A normative value has been established with a score ≥20 being abnormal. However, there is no defined minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This study prospectively determines the MCID of SVHI-10 among a diverse group of singers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>103 adult singers with and without voice complaints completed SVHI-10 twice, 30 days apart. MCID for the SVHI-10 was determined using distribution-based receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two men (1 transgender), 75 women (1 transgender), and 6 nonbinary individuals participated. The most frequently reported singing genres were classical (44.7%), musical theater (17.5%), and pop (10.7%). Mean initial SVHI-10 score was 13.05 (standard deviation 7.397), and mean follow-up SVHI-10 was 13.13 (7.994). There was a significant positive correlation between initial and follow-up SVHI-10 scores (r = 0.879, p < 0.001). SVHI-10 scores were significantly higher among participants who reported voice changes in the past year (p < 0.001) or sought voice treatment (p = 0.001) compared with participants who did not. SVHI-10 scores varied significantly based on singing type. The area under the ROC curve for SVHI-10 was 0.700 (p = 0.003). The SVHI-10 MCID was determined to be 9.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An SVHI-10 score change ≥10 should be considered clinically meaningful. This definition has been missing from the literature and will improve understanding of patients' responses to treatment, which will help advance clinical care and track research outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Prospective Determination.\",\"authors\":\"Claire E Perrin, VyVy N Young, Yue Ma, Clark A Rosen, Steven D Stockton, Sarah L Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.31808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 (SVHI-10) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that assesses patients' perception of handicap related to singing voice. A normative value has been established with a score ≥20 being abnormal. However, there is no defined minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This study prospectively determines the MCID of SVHI-10 among a diverse group of singers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>103 adult singers with and without voice complaints completed SVHI-10 twice, 30 days apart. MCID for the SVHI-10 was determined using distribution-based receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two men (1 transgender), 75 women (1 transgender), and 6 nonbinary individuals participated. The most frequently reported singing genres were classical (44.7%), musical theater (17.5%), and pop (10.7%). Mean initial SVHI-10 score was 13.05 (standard deviation 7.397), and mean follow-up SVHI-10 was 13.13 (7.994). There was a significant positive correlation between initial and follow-up SVHI-10 scores (r = 0.879, p < 0.001). SVHI-10 scores were significantly higher among participants who reported voice changes in the past year (p < 0.001) or sought voice treatment (p = 0.001) compared with participants who did not. SVHI-10 scores varied significantly based on singing type. The area under the ROC curve for SVHI-10 was 0.700 (p = 0.003). The SVHI-10 MCID was determined to be 9.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An SVHI-10 score change ≥10 should be considered clinically meaningful. This definition has been missing from the literature and will improve understanding of patients' responses to treatment, which will help advance clinical care and track research outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31808\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:歌唱嗓音障碍指数-10(SVHI-10)是一项经过验证的患者报告结果测量(PROM),用于评估患者对歌唱嗓音障碍的感知。其标准值已经确定,得分≥20 为异常。然而,目前尚未确定最小临床重要差异(MCID)。本研究前瞻性地确定了 SVHI-10 在不同歌手群体中的 MCID。结果:22 名男性(1 名变性人)、1 名女性(1 名变性人)、1 名男性(1 名变性人)、1 名女性(1 名变性人)、1 名男性(1 名变性人)和 1 名女性(1 名变性人)完成了 SVHI-10 的测量:共有 22 名男性(1 名变性人)、75 名女性(1 名变性人)和 6 名非二进制人士参与。最常见的演唱类型为古典(44.7%)、音乐剧(17.5%)和流行(10.7%)。初始 SVHI-10 平均分为 13.05(标准差为 7.397),后续 SVHI-10 平均分为 13.13(7.994)。初始和随访 SVHI-10 评分之间存在明显的正相关性(r = 0.879,p 结论:初始和随访 SVHI-10 评分之间存在明显的正相关性:SVHI-10 评分变化≥10 分应被视为具有临床意义。这一定义在文献中一直缺失,它将提高人们对患者治疗反应的理解,有助于推进临床治疗和追踪研究成果:4 《喉镜》,2024 年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Prospective Determination.

Background/objectives: The Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 (SVHI-10) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that assesses patients' perception of handicap related to singing voice. A normative value has been established with a score ≥20 being abnormal. However, there is no defined minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This study prospectively determines the MCID of SVHI-10 among a diverse group of singers.

Methods: 103 adult singers with and without voice complaints completed SVHI-10 twice, 30 days apart. MCID for the SVHI-10 was determined using distribution-based receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Twenty-two men (1 transgender), 75 women (1 transgender), and 6 nonbinary individuals participated. The most frequently reported singing genres were classical (44.7%), musical theater (17.5%), and pop (10.7%). Mean initial SVHI-10 score was 13.05 (standard deviation 7.397), and mean follow-up SVHI-10 was 13.13 (7.994). There was a significant positive correlation between initial and follow-up SVHI-10 scores (r = 0.879, p < 0.001). SVHI-10 scores were significantly higher among participants who reported voice changes in the past year (p < 0.001) or sought voice treatment (p = 0.001) compared with participants who did not. SVHI-10 scores varied significantly based on singing type. The area under the ROC curve for SVHI-10 was 0.700 (p = 0.003). The SVHI-10 MCID was determined to be 9.5.

Conclusions: An SVHI-10 score change ≥10 should be considered clinically meaningful. This definition has been missing from the literature and will improve understanding of patients' responses to treatment, which will help advance clinical care and track research outcomes.

Level of evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
期刊最新文献
Cost Analysis of Avoiding Gastrostomy Tube in Robin Sequence Neonates that Undergo Mandibular Distraction. Development of Machine Learning Copilot to Assist Novices in Learning Flexible Laryngoscopy. Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Prospective Determination. Impact of Audio-Visual Complexity on Symptomatology of Laryngeal Dystonia: A Virtual Reality Study. Postoperative Complications in Lingual Versus Palatine Tonsillectomies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1