全面评估不同婴儿喂养方式对环境的影响:观察研究《绿色母亲》。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1111/jan.16473
Judit Cos-Busquets, Rosa Maria Cabedo-Ferreiro, Liudmila Liutsko, Azahara Reyes-Lacalle, Rosa García-Sierra, Margalida Colldeforns-Vidal, Edilene Pereira Andrade, Mª Mercedes Vicente-Hernández, Miriam Gómez-Masvidal, Laura Montero-Pons, Pere Torán-Monserrat, Gemma Falguera-Puig, Gemma Cazorla-Ortiz
{"title":"全面评估不同婴儿喂养方式对环境的影响:观察研究《绿色母亲》。","authors":"Judit Cos-Busquets, Rosa Maria Cabedo-Ferreiro, Liudmila Liutsko, Azahara Reyes-Lacalle, Rosa García-Sierra, Margalida Colldeforns-Vidal, Edilene Pereira Andrade, Mª Mercedes Vicente-Hernández, Miriam Gómez-Masvidal, Laura Montero-Pons, Pere Torán-Monserrat, Gemma Falguera-Puig, Gemma Cazorla-Ortiz","doi":"10.1111/jan.16473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim(s): </strong>To observe and compare the environmental impacts of different types of infant feeding, considering the use of formula, infant feeding accessories, potentially increased maternal dietary intake during breastfeeding (BF) and food consumption habits.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational cross-sectional multicentre study conducted in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area of the Catalan Institute of Health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 419 postpartum women on infant feeding type (formula milk and accessories), maternal dietary intake (24-h register) and food consumption habits from November 2022 to April 2023. The environmental impacts (climate change (CC), water consumption and water scarcity) of the infant feeding types and maternal diet were calculated using the IPCC, ReCiPE and AWARE indicators, respectively. The differences in impacts were calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences for the three environmental impacts were observed. The CC impact of formula milk and feeding accessories was 0.01 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq for exclusive BF, 1.55 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq for mixed feeding and 4.98 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq for formula feeding. While BF mothers consumed an extra 238 kcal, no significant differences were found related to maternal diet across feeding types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exclusive BF was the most sustainable type of infant feeding, considering formula and infant feeding accessories. In our study, the difference between the impacts of BF and non-BF mothers' diet was insignificant.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Offer informative and educational support for midwives and other healthcare professionals on BF and a healthy, sustainable diet to transfer this knowledge to the general public.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Raise the general public's awareness about BF and a healthy, sustainable diet. To reduce environmental impacts through behavioural changes.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>STROBE.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients of the Catalan Health Service reviewed the content of the data collection tools.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>(for the whole GREEN MOTHER project): NCT05729581 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Different Infant Feeding Types: The Observational Study GREEN MOTHER.\",\"authors\":\"Judit Cos-Busquets, Rosa Maria Cabedo-Ferreiro, Liudmila Liutsko, Azahara Reyes-Lacalle, Rosa García-Sierra, Margalida Colldeforns-Vidal, Edilene Pereira Andrade, Mª Mercedes Vicente-Hernández, Miriam Gómez-Masvidal, Laura Montero-Pons, Pere Torán-Monserrat, Gemma Falguera-Puig, Gemma Cazorla-Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim(s): </strong>To observe and compare the environmental impacts of different types of infant feeding, considering the use of formula, infant feeding accessories, potentially increased maternal dietary intake during breastfeeding (BF) and food consumption habits.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational cross-sectional multicentre study conducted in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area of the Catalan Institute of Health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 419 postpartum women on infant feeding type (formula milk and accessories), maternal dietary intake (24-h register) and food consumption habits from November 2022 to April 2023. The environmental impacts (climate change (CC), water consumption and water scarcity) of the infant feeding types and maternal diet were calculated using the IPCC, ReCiPE and AWARE indicators, respectively. The differences in impacts were calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences for the three environmental impacts were observed. The CC impact of formula milk and feeding accessories was 0.01 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq for exclusive BF, 1.55 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq for mixed feeding and 4.98 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq for formula feeding. While BF mothers consumed an extra 238 kcal, no significant differences were found related to maternal diet across feeding types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exclusive BF was the most sustainable type of infant feeding, considering formula and infant feeding accessories. In our study, the difference between the impacts of BF and non-BF mothers' diet was insignificant.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Offer informative and educational support for midwives and other healthcare professionals on BF and a healthy, sustainable diet to transfer this knowledge to the general public.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Raise the general public's awareness about BF and a healthy, sustainable diet. To reduce environmental impacts through behavioural changes.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>STROBE.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients of the Catalan Health Service reviewed the content of the data collection tools.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>(for the whole GREEN MOTHER project): NCT05729581 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16473\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:观察和比较不同类型的婴儿喂养对环境的影响:观察和比较不同类型的婴儿喂养方式对环境的影响,同时考虑到配方奶粉的使用、婴儿喂养配件、母乳喂养(BF)期间可能增加的母亲膳食摄入量以及食品消费习惯:设计:加泰罗尼亚卫生研究所在巴塞罗那市区开展的一项多中心横断面观察研究:从 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 4 月,收集了 419 名产后妇女的数据,内容包括婴儿喂养类型(配方奶和辅食)、母亲饮食摄入量(24 小时登记)和食物消费习惯。使用 IPCC、ReCiPE 和 AWARE 指标分别计算了婴儿喂养类型和产妇饮食对环境的影响(气候变化 (CC)、耗水量和水资源短缺)。影响差异通过 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行计算:结果:三种环境影响存在显著差异。配方奶和喂养附件对 CC 的影响是:纯母乳喂养为 0.01 千克二氧化碳当量,混合喂养为 1.55 千克二氧化碳当量,配方奶喂养为 4.98 千克二氧化碳当量。虽然婴儿喂养的母亲额外消耗了 238 千卡热量,但没有发现不同喂养方式的母亲饮食有显著差异:结论:考虑到配方奶粉和婴儿喂养附件,纯母乳喂养是最可持续的婴儿喂养方式。在我们的研究中,婴儿纯母乳喂养和非婴儿纯母乳喂养对母亲饮食的影响差异不大:为助产士和其他医护人员提供有关婴儿喂养和健康、可持续饮食的信息和教育支持,向公众传播这方面的知识:提高公众对婴儿喂养和健康、可持续饮食的认识。报告方法:STROBE:患者或公众的贡献:患者或公众的贡献:加泰罗尼亚卫生服务机构的患者对数据收集工具的内容进行了审查:NCT05729581(https://clinicaltrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comprehensive Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Different Infant Feeding Types: The Observational Study GREEN MOTHER.

Aim(s): To observe and compare the environmental impacts of different types of infant feeding, considering the use of formula, infant feeding accessories, potentially increased maternal dietary intake during breastfeeding (BF) and food consumption habits.

Design: An observational cross-sectional multicentre study conducted in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area of the Catalan Institute of Health.

Methods: Data were collected from 419 postpartum women on infant feeding type (formula milk and accessories), maternal dietary intake (24-h register) and food consumption habits from November 2022 to April 2023. The environmental impacts (climate change (CC), water consumption and water scarcity) of the infant feeding types and maternal diet were calculated using the IPCC, ReCiPE and AWARE indicators, respectively. The differences in impacts were calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: Significant differences for the three environmental impacts were observed. The CC impact of formula milk and feeding accessories was 0.01 kg CO2eq for exclusive BF, 1.55 kg CO2eq for mixed feeding and 4.98 kg CO2eq for formula feeding. While BF mothers consumed an extra 238 kcal, no significant differences were found related to maternal diet across feeding types.

Conclusion: Exclusive BF was the most sustainable type of infant feeding, considering formula and infant feeding accessories. In our study, the difference between the impacts of BF and non-BF mothers' diet was insignificant.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Offer informative and educational support for midwives and other healthcare professionals on BF and a healthy, sustainable diet to transfer this knowledge to the general public.

Impact: Raise the general public's awareness about BF and a healthy, sustainable diet. To reduce environmental impacts through behavioural changes.

Reporting method: STROBE.

Patient or public contribution: Patients of the Catalan Health Service reviewed the content of the data collection tools.

Trial registration: (for the whole GREEN MOTHER project): NCT05729581 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Preparing Graduate Nursing Students to Lead Nursing Green Teams: Approach and Identified Greening Opportunities and Solutions. A Comprehensive Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Different Infant Feeding Types: The Observational Study GREEN MOTHER. Exploring Emotional Well-Being and Support of Midwives Who Provide Termination of Pregnancy Care: An International Survey. Unconscious bias and (nursing) care. "I Am Forever Changed": A Phenomenological Study of the Existential Experiences of Parents of Children and Young People With Complex Care Needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1