18F-FES PET/CT 对复发或转移性乳腺癌临床治疗决策的影响。

Jeongryul Ryu, Jaewon Hyung, Sangwon Han, Jae Ho Jeong, Sae Byul Lee, Tae-Kyung Robyn Yoo, Jisun Kim, Hee Jeong Kim, Il Yong Chung, Beom Seok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Hyehyun Jeong, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon
{"title":"18F-FES PET/CT 对复发或转移性乳腺癌临床治疗决策的影响。","authors":"Jeongryul Ryu, Jaewon Hyung, Sangwon Han, Jae Ho Jeong, Sae Byul Lee, Tae-Kyung Robyn Yoo, Jisun Kim, Hee Jeong Kim, Il Yong Chung, Beom Seok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Hyehyun Jeong, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical impact of 16α-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-FES) PET/CT on patient management has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT on the management of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Study subjects were identified retrospectively from a database of a prospective trial for postmarketing surveillance of <sup>18</sup>F-FES between 2021 and 2023. Patients who were suspected or known to have recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on a routine standard workup were included. Planned management before and actual management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT were assessed by 2 experienced medical oncologists via medical chart review. A 5-point questionnaire was provided to evaluate the value of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT for management planning. The rate of intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes, and the impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT according to PET/CT result or clinical indication, were examined. <b>Results:</b> Of the 344 included patients, 120 (35%) experienced a change in management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT. In 139 (40%) patients,<sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT supported the existing management decision without a change in management. Intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes accounted for 64% (77/120) and 68% (82/120) of all changes, respectively. A higher rate of change was observed when lesions were <sup>18</sup>F-FES-negative (44% [36/81]) than <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive (30% [51/172]) or mixed <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive/negative (36% [33/91]). Regarding clinical indications, the highest rate of change was shown when evaluating the origins of metastasis of double primary cancers (64% [9/14]). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT modified the management of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, serving as an impactful imaging modality in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1689-1694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT on Clinical Decisions in the Management of Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jeongryul Ryu, Jaewon Hyung, Sangwon Han, Jae Ho Jeong, Sae Byul Lee, Tae-Kyung Robyn Yoo, Jisun Kim, Hee Jeong Kim, Il Yong Chung, Beom Seok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Hyehyun Jeong, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.124.267913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The clinical impact of 16α-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-FES) PET/CT on patient management has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT on the management of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Study subjects were identified retrospectively from a database of a prospective trial for postmarketing surveillance of <sup>18</sup>F-FES between 2021 and 2023. Patients who were suspected or known to have recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on a routine standard workup were included. Planned management before and actual management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT were assessed by 2 experienced medical oncologists via medical chart review. A 5-point questionnaire was provided to evaluate the value of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT for management planning. The rate of intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes, and the impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT according to PET/CT result or clinical indication, were examined. <b>Results:</b> Of the 344 included patients, 120 (35%) experienced a change in management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT. In 139 (40%) patients,<sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT supported the existing management decision without a change in management. Intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes accounted for 64% (77/120) and 68% (82/120) of all changes, respectively. A higher rate of change was observed when lesions were <sup>18</sup>F-FES-negative (44% [36/81]) than <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive (30% [51/172]) or mixed <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive/negative (36% [33/91]). Regarding clinical indications, the highest rate of change was shown when evaluating the origins of metastasis of double primary cancers (64% [9/14]). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT modified the management of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, serving as an impactful imaging modality in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1689-1694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

16α-18F- 氟-17β-雌二醇(18F-FES)PET/CT 对患者管理的临床影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估 18F-FES PET/CT 对复发或转移性乳腺癌患者治疗的临床影响。研究方法从 2021 年至 2023 年期间 18F-FES 上市后监测前瞻性试验的数据库中回顾性地确定研究对象。研究对象包括根据常规标准检查结果怀疑或已知患有复发性或转移性雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的患者。由两名经验丰富的肿瘤内科医生通过病历审查对 18F-FES PET/CT 之前的计划管理和之后的实际管理进行评估。为评估 18F-FES PET/CT 对治疗计划的价值,提供了一份 5 分问卷。根据 PET/CT 结果或临床指征,对意向治疗率和跨学科变更以及 18F-FES PET/CT 的影响进行了研究。结果:在纳入的 344 例患者中,有 120 例(35%)患者在接受 18F-FES PET/CT 治疗后改变了治疗方案。在139例(40%)患者中,18F-FES PET/CT支持现有的治疗决定,没有改变治疗方案。意向治疗和跨学科改变分别占所有改变的64%(77/120)和68%(82/120)。与 18F-FES 阳性(30% [51/172])或 18F-FES 阳性/阴性混合(36% [33/91])相比,病变为 18F-FES 阴性(44% [36/81])时的变更率更高。在临床适应症方面,评估双原发癌转移来源的变化率最高(64% [9/14])。结论:18F-FES PET/CT 改变了复发性或转移性乳腺癌的治疗方法,是临床实践中一种有影响力的成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of 18F-FES PET/CT on Clinical Decisions in the Management of Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.

The clinical impact of 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (18F-FES) PET/CT on patient management has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of 18F-FES PET/CT on the management of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Study subjects were identified retrospectively from a database of a prospective trial for postmarketing surveillance of 18F-FES between 2021 and 2023. Patients who were suspected or known to have recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on a routine standard workup were included. Planned management before and actual management after 18F-FES PET/CT were assessed by 2 experienced medical oncologists via medical chart review. A 5-point questionnaire was provided to evaluate the value of 18F-FES PET/CT for management planning. The rate of intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes, and the impact of 18F-FES PET/CT according to PET/CT result or clinical indication, were examined. Results: Of the 344 included patients, 120 (35%) experienced a change in management after 18F-FES PET/CT. In 139 (40%) patients,18F-FES PET/CT supported the existing management decision without a change in management. Intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes accounted for 64% (77/120) and 68% (82/120) of all changes, respectively. A higher rate of change was observed when lesions were 18F-FES-negative (44% [36/81]) than 18F-FES-positive (30% [51/172]) or mixed 18F-FES-positive/negative (36% [33/91]). Regarding clinical indications, the highest rate of change was shown when evaluating the origins of metastasis of double primary cancers (64% [9/14]). Conclusion: 18F-FES PET/CT modified the management of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, serving as an impactful imaging modality in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals: A Sustainable Path to the Improvement of Patient Care. Is the Clinical Implementation of In-House Artificial Intelligence-Developed Algorithms Happening? Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Imaging and Therapy in the Era of Personalized Medicine. Maintaining the Evidence for In Vivo Brain Estrogen Receptor Density by Neuroendocrine Aging and Relationships with Cognition and Symptomatology. From Scientist to Analyst to Strategist: Aharon (Ronny) Gal Talks with Ken Herrmann and Johannes Czernin About Leadership in Multinational Pharma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1