用肱骨火柴棒骨移植物最大限度地进行压合固定的无水泥反向肩关节成形术。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00062
Alvin Ouseph, Eddie Y Lo, Paolo Montemaggi, Sumant G Krishnan
{"title":"用肱骨火柴棒骨移植物最大限度地进行压合固定的无水泥反向肩关节成形术。","authors":"Alvin Ouseph, Eddie Y Lo, Paolo Montemaggi, Sumant G Krishnan","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become increasingly popular because of the improved implant design, porous ingrowth surface, and surgical techniques. When avoiding the risks of cement use, a press-fit arthroplasty stem that has been implanted may not feel immediately stable, especially if the medullary canal size is in between standard stem diameters. To help surgeons improve fixation and avoid overstuffing the medullary canal, we present the matchstick autograft augmentation technique. The use of humeral autograft, analogous to impaction grafting in hip arthroplasty, has been reported to have promising short-term outcomes<sup>2,3</sup>. This technique of using humeral autograft material, dubbed matchstick autografts because of their shape and size, allows for optimization of humeral stem stability with the option of smaller cementless humeral implants. By avoiding overstuffing of the medullary canal, this technique aims to reduce the incidences of intraoperative fracture, postoperative stress shielding, and potential implant loosening<sup>4-6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is routinely performed via the anterosuperior approach<sup>7</sup>; however, a deltopectoral approach can be utilized if desired. The canal is sequentially broached with implant trials until the tactile feedback demonstrates axial and rotational stability. In cases in which tactile feedback during implantation demonstrates slight movement, the smaller implant size can be selected and augmented with matchstick autograft. An oscillating saw is utilized to cut the edges of the previously resected humeral head in order to expose the subchondral bone surface. Graft sticks about 20 mm in length and 1 to 3 mm in width are then fashioned. Humeral trials are then implanted with the matchstick grafts placed lengthwise alongside the humeral stem. Axial and rotational press-fit is again assessed. If adequate, the formal humeral implant is selected and implanted in position. As in conventional impaction grafting, the grafts are compressed to the side of the humeral canal, but they offer more corticocancellous structure than bone chips. This technique is applicable even in some fracture scenarios.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>When a specific press-fit humeral stem size does not achieve adequate stability, there are typically 3 surgical alternatives. First, a larger stem size can be selected. Second, the implant can be inserted deeper to achieve press-fit stability. Third, cement can be added to fill the medullary canal and create immediate stability.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>When implanting the humeral prosthesis, the operating surgeon's primary goal is stem stability. When faced with lack of stability, the surgeon can select a larger humeral stem, risking stress shielding; implant the stem deeper, compromising length and risking humeral fracture; or consider a cemented implant. In order to minimize the risk of intraoperative cardiopulmonary events and complicated subsequent revision surgeries<sup>8</sup>, the use of cement should be avoided if at all possible. Shoulder surgeons have reported grafting techniques, analogous to hip impaction grafting, that have yielded good success<sup>3</sup>. The technique that we describe utilizes a matchstick structural autograft that helps improve cementless fixation in primary humeral implantation cases and allows for the use of a smaller stem. The structural shape of the graft allows this technique to be utilized even in selected proximal humeral fractures.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Other studies have reported on the use of softer cancellous autografts to stabilize humeral implants in shoulder arthroplasty. In a study of 286 arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, Lucas et al. reported that 267 humeral stems (93.3%) had not subsided<sup>3</sup>. Humphrey and Bravman used cancellous autograft to achieve metaphyseal centering of the humeral component in 53 patients, with no cases of humeral implant loosening at 12 months<sup>2</sup>. Lo et al. reported 91% tuberosity healing in their series of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasties augmented with matchstick autografts<sup>1</sup>, with no cases of aseptic humeral stem loosening. Montemaggi et al. used matchstick autografts to augment 46 primary cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasties and found zero instances of humeral loosening at 1-year follow-up<sup>9</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>The strongest humeral matchstick grafts come from the subchondral surface.After creating the graft, it is palpated for structural integrity. A stiffer or softer graft can be chosen, depending on surgeon preference.Surgeons can try impacting the graft with humeral trials to assess the stem stability prior to final implantation.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>RTSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyFX = fracture3D CT = 3-dimensional computed tomographyXR = x-rayFU = follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cementless Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Technique to Maximize Press-Fit Fixation with Humeral Matchstick Bone Grafts.\",\"authors\":\"Alvin Ouseph, Eddie Y Lo, Paolo Montemaggi, Sumant G Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become increasingly popular because of the improved implant design, porous ingrowth surface, and surgical techniques. When avoiding the risks of cement use, a press-fit arthroplasty stem that has been implanted may not feel immediately stable, especially if the medullary canal size is in between standard stem diameters. To help surgeons improve fixation and avoid overstuffing the medullary canal, we present the matchstick autograft augmentation technique. The use of humeral autograft, analogous to impaction grafting in hip arthroplasty, has been reported to have promising short-term outcomes<sup>2,3</sup>. This technique of using humeral autograft material, dubbed matchstick autografts because of their shape and size, allows for optimization of humeral stem stability with the option of smaller cementless humeral implants. By avoiding overstuffing of the medullary canal, this technique aims to reduce the incidences of intraoperative fracture, postoperative stress shielding, and potential implant loosening<sup>4-6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is routinely performed via the anterosuperior approach<sup>7</sup>; however, a deltopectoral approach can be utilized if desired. The canal is sequentially broached with implant trials until the tactile feedback demonstrates axial and rotational stability. In cases in which tactile feedback during implantation demonstrates slight movement, the smaller implant size can be selected and augmented with matchstick autograft. An oscillating saw is utilized to cut the edges of the previously resected humeral head in order to expose the subchondral bone surface. Graft sticks about 20 mm in length and 1 to 3 mm in width are then fashioned. Humeral trials are then implanted with the matchstick grafts placed lengthwise alongside the humeral stem. Axial and rotational press-fit is again assessed. If adequate, the formal humeral implant is selected and implanted in position. As in conventional impaction grafting, the grafts are compressed to the side of the humeral canal, but they offer more corticocancellous structure than bone chips. This technique is applicable even in some fracture scenarios.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>When a specific press-fit humeral stem size does not achieve adequate stability, there are typically 3 surgical alternatives. First, a larger stem size can be selected. Second, the implant can be inserted deeper to achieve press-fit stability. Third, cement can be added to fill the medullary canal and create immediate stability.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>When implanting the humeral prosthesis, the operating surgeon's primary goal is stem stability. When faced with lack of stability, the surgeon can select a larger humeral stem, risking stress shielding; implant the stem deeper, compromising length and risking humeral fracture; or consider a cemented implant. In order to minimize the risk of intraoperative cardiopulmonary events and complicated subsequent revision surgeries<sup>8</sup>, the use of cement should be avoided if at all possible. Shoulder surgeons have reported grafting techniques, analogous to hip impaction grafting, that have yielded good success<sup>3</sup>. The technique that we describe utilizes a matchstick structural autograft that helps improve cementless fixation in primary humeral implantation cases and allows for the use of a smaller stem. The structural shape of the graft allows this technique to be utilized even in selected proximal humeral fractures.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Other studies have reported on the use of softer cancellous autografts to stabilize humeral implants in shoulder arthroplasty. In a study of 286 arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, Lucas et al. reported that 267 humeral stems (93.3%) had not subsided<sup>3</sup>. Humphrey and Bravman used cancellous autograft to achieve metaphyseal centering of the humeral component in 53 patients, with no cases of humeral implant loosening at 12 months<sup>2</sup>. Lo et al. reported 91% tuberosity healing in their series of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasties augmented with matchstick autografts<sup>1</sup>, with no cases of aseptic humeral stem loosening. Montemaggi et al. used matchstick autografts to augment 46 primary cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasties and found zero instances of humeral loosening at 1-year follow-up<sup>9</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>The strongest humeral matchstick grafts come from the subchondral surface.After creating the graft, it is palpated for structural integrity. A stiffer or softer graft can be chosen, depending on surgeon preference.Surgeons can try impacting the graft with humeral trials to assess the stem stability prior to final implantation.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>RTSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyFX = fracture3D CT = 3-dimensional computed tomographyXR = x-rayFU = follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00062\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于植入物设计、多孔植入表面和手术技术的改进,无骨水泥反向肩关节成形术越来越受欢迎。在避免使用骨水泥的风险时,已植入的压入式关节成形术柄可能不会立即感觉稳定,尤其是当髓管大小介于标准柄直径之间时。为了帮助外科医生改善固定,避免髓质管过度膨胀,我们提出了火柴棒自体移植物增量技术。肱骨自体移植物的使用类似于髋关节置换术中的撞击移植,据报道具有良好的短期效果2,3。这种使用肱骨自体移植物材料的技术因其形状和大小而被称为 "火柴棍 "自体移植物,可优化肱骨柄的稳定性,并可选择较小的无骨水泥肱骨植入物。通过避免髓质管过度充盈,该技术旨在减少术中骨折、术后应力屏蔽和潜在植入物松动的发生率4-6:无骨反向全肩关节置换术通常采用前上方入路7,但如果需要,也可采用胸骨下入路。在进行植入试验时,按顺序对管道进行扩孔,直到触觉反馈显示轴向和旋转稳定性。如果在植入过程中触觉反馈显示有轻微的移动,则可以选择较小的植入体,并用火柴杆自体移植物进行增量。使用摆动锯切割先前切除的肱骨头边缘,以暴露软骨下骨表面。然后制作长约20毫米、宽1至3毫米的移植棒。然后将火柴棒移植物纵向放置在肱骨干旁,进行肱骨试验植入。再次评估轴向和旋转压力配合情况。如果合适,则选择正式的肱骨假体并将其植入到位。与传统的撞击移植术一样,移植物会被压缩到肱骨管的一侧,但与骨片相比,它们能提供更多的皮质冠状结构。这种技术甚至适用于某些骨折情况:当特定的压入式肱骨柄尺寸无法达到足够的稳定性时,通常有三种手术替代方案。首先,可以选择更大尺寸的茎干。第二,将植入物插入更深的位置,以达到压入配合的稳定性。第三,可以添加骨水泥来填充髓质管,以获得即时稳定性:理由:在植入肱骨假体时,手术医生的首要目标是假体柄的稳定性。当缺乏稳定性时,外科医生可以选择更大的肱骨柄,冒着应力屏蔽的风险;将柄植入更深的位置,影响长度并冒着肱骨骨折的风险;或者考虑骨水泥植入。为了将术中心肺事件和后续复杂翻修手术的风险降至最低8,应尽可能避免使用骨水泥。肩部外科医生曾报道过类似于髋关节撞击移植的移植技术,并取得了良好的效果3。我们介绍的技术采用了火柴棍结构的自体移植物,有助于改善初次肱骨植入病例中的无骨水泥固定,并允许使用较小的骨干。该移植物的结构形状使得该技术甚至可用于选定的肱骨近端骨折:其他研究报告称,在肩关节置换术中使用较软的松质骨自体移植物来稳定肱骨植入物。Lucas 等人对至少随访 2 年的 286 例关节置换术进行了研究,结果表明 267 例(93.3%)肱骨柄未发生下沉3。Humphrey 和 Bravman 使用松质骨自体移植物使 53 例患者的肱骨组件达到骺端中心,12 个月后无一例肱骨假体松动2。Lo等人在使用火柴棒自体移植物增强的无骨水泥反向全肩关节置换术中,91%的结节愈合1,无一例无菌性肱骨柄松动。Montemaggi等人使用火柴棒自体移植物增强了46例初次无骨水泥反向全肩关节置换术,在1年的随访中未发现肱骨松动病例9:重要提示:最坚固的肱骨火柴棒移植物来自软骨下表面。根据外科医生的偏好,可以选择较硬或较软的移植物。外科医生可以尝试用肱骨试验冲击移植物,以便在最终植入前评估骨干的稳定性:RTSA=反向全肩关节置换术FX=骨折3D CT=三维计算机断层扫描XR=X射线FU=随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cementless Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Technique to Maximize Press-Fit Fixation with Humeral Matchstick Bone Grafts.

Background: Cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become increasingly popular because of the improved implant design, porous ingrowth surface, and surgical techniques. When avoiding the risks of cement use, a press-fit arthroplasty stem that has been implanted may not feel immediately stable, especially if the medullary canal size is in between standard stem diameters. To help surgeons improve fixation and avoid overstuffing the medullary canal, we present the matchstick autograft augmentation technique. The use of humeral autograft, analogous to impaction grafting in hip arthroplasty, has been reported to have promising short-term outcomes2,3. This technique of using humeral autograft material, dubbed matchstick autografts because of their shape and size, allows for optimization of humeral stem stability with the option of smaller cementless humeral implants. By avoiding overstuffing of the medullary canal, this technique aims to reduce the incidences of intraoperative fracture, postoperative stress shielding, and potential implant loosening4-6.

Description: Cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is routinely performed via the anterosuperior approach7; however, a deltopectoral approach can be utilized if desired. The canal is sequentially broached with implant trials until the tactile feedback demonstrates axial and rotational stability. In cases in which tactile feedback during implantation demonstrates slight movement, the smaller implant size can be selected and augmented with matchstick autograft. An oscillating saw is utilized to cut the edges of the previously resected humeral head in order to expose the subchondral bone surface. Graft sticks about 20 mm in length and 1 to 3 mm in width are then fashioned. Humeral trials are then implanted with the matchstick grafts placed lengthwise alongside the humeral stem. Axial and rotational press-fit is again assessed. If adequate, the formal humeral implant is selected and implanted in position. As in conventional impaction grafting, the grafts are compressed to the side of the humeral canal, but they offer more corticocancellous structure than bone chips. This technique is applicable even in some fracture scenarios.

Alternatives: When a specific press-fit humeral stem size does not achieve adequate stability, there are typically 3 surgical alternatives. First, a larger stem size can be selected. Second, the implant can be inserted deeper to achieve press-fit stability. Third, cement can be added to fill the medullary canal and create immediate stability.

Rationale: When implanting the humeral prosthesis, the operating surgeon's primary goal is stem stability. When faced with lack of stability, the surgeon can select a larger humeral stem, risking stress shielding; implant the stem deeper, compromising length and risking humeral fracture; or consider a cemented implant. In order to minimize the risk of intraoperative cardiopulmonary events and complicated subsequent revision surgeries8, the use of cement should be avoided if at all possible. Shoulder surgeons have reported grafting techniques, analogous to hip impaction grafting, that have yielded good success3. The technique that we describe utilizes a matchstick structural autograft that helps improve cementless fixation in primary humeral implantation cases and allows for the use of a smaller stem. The structural shape of the graft allows this technique to be utilized even in selected proximal humeral fractures.

Expected outcomes: Other studies have reported on the use of softer cancellous autografts to stabilize humeral implants in shoulder arthroplasty. In a study of 286 arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, Lucas et al. reported that 267 humeral stems (93.3%) had not subsided3. Humphrey and Bravman used cancellous autograft to achieve metaphyseal centering of the humeral component in 53 patients, with no cases of humeral implant loosening at 12 months2. Lo et al. reported 91% tuberosity healing in their series of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasties augmented with matchstick autografts1, with no cases of aseptic humeral stem loosening. Montemaggi et al. used matchstick autografts to augment 46 primary cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasties and found zero instances of humeral loosening at 1-year follow-up9.

Important tips: The strongest humeral matchstick grafts come from the subchondral surface.After creating the graft, it is palpated for structural integrity. A stiffer or softer graft can be chosen, depending on surgeon preference.Surgeons can try impacting the graft with humeral trials to assess the stem stability prior to final implantation.

Acronyms and abbreviations: RTSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyFX = fracture3D CT = 3-dimensional computed tomographyXR = x-rayFU = follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1