罗氏 c 702 卡马西平检测法线性度调查。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1177/00045632241292510
Alice A Stephenson, Chris G Robinson, Rachel Marrington, James M Hawley
{"title":"罗氏 c 702 卡马西平检测法线性度调查。","authors":"Alice A Stephenson, Chris G Robinson, Rachel Marrington, James M Hawley","doi":"10.1177/00045632241292510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbamazepine is an anticonvulsant drug which is monitored in patients due to toxic side effects. At Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), carbamazepine is measured using Roche's Kinetic Interaction of Microparticles in Solution (KIMS) method on the c 702 platform. The assay has an upper limit of linearity of 20 mg/L. Samples with concentrations above this limit should be identified and manually diluted. However, a poor EQA return from UK NEQAS for Tox and TDM Distribution 456 has highlighted an issue with the Roche KIMS assay. Sample A of the distribution had a carbamazepine concentration of 36 mg/L but was underreported by several Roche users. This indicated that the assay was not consistently identifying high concentration samples which required a dilution.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this investigation, fresh frozen plasma was spiked with carbamazepine concentrations ranging from 15 to 40 mg/L. The spiked samples and EQA material were analysed at two clinical laboratories using the Roche KIMS assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Samples spiked with concentrations 20-30 mg/L were not consistently identified for dilution by the analyser. This was observed at both hospital sites. Spike samples and EQA with concentrations >30 mg/L were correctly identified at both sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The manual dilution policy has been changed at MFT, so all samples with a carbamazepine level ≥15 mg/L will be manually diluted. The problem was reported to Roche who are investigating the issue further. We would suggest that other laboratories look at validating their dilution protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632241292510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation into the linearity of the Roche c 702 carbamazepine assay.\",\"authors\":\"Alice A Stephenson, Chris G Robinson, Rachel Marrington, James M Hawley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632241292510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbamazepine is an anticonvulsant drug which is monitored in patients due to toxic side effects. At Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), carbamazepine is measured using Roche's Kinetic Interaction of Microparticles in Solution (KIMS) method on the c 702 platform. The assay has an upper limit of linearity of 20 mg/L. Samples with concentrations above this limit should be identified and manually diluted. However, a poor EQA return from UK NEQAS for Tox and TDM Distribution 456 has highlighted an issue with the Roche KIMS assay. Sample A of the distribution had a carbamazepine concentration of 36 mg/L but was underreported by several Roche users. This indicated that the assay was not consistently identifying high concentration samples which required a dilution.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this investigation, fresh frozen plasma was spiked with carbamazepine concentrations ranging from 15 to 40 mg/L. The spiked samples and EQA material were analysed at two clinical laboratories using the Roche KIMS assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Samples spiked with concentrations 20-30 mg/L were not consistently identified for dilution by the analyser. This was observed at both hospital sites. Spike samples and EQA with concentrations >30 mg/L were correctly identified at both sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The manual dilution policy has been changed at MFT, so all samples with a carbamazepine level ≥15 mg/L will be manually diluted. The problem was reported to Roche who are investigating the issue further. We would suggest that other laboratories look at validating their dilution protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45632241292510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241292510\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241292510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卡马西平是一种抗惊厥药物,因其毒副作用而需要对患者进行监测。曼彻斯特大学 NHS 基金会信托基金会(MFT)在 c 702 平台上使用罗氏溶液中微颗粒动力学相互作用 (KIMS) 方法检测卡马西平。该测定的线性上限为 20 mg/L。浓度超过此上限的样品应进行识别和人工稀释。然而,英国 NEQAS 对 Tox 和 TDM 分发 456 的 EQA 报告不佳,凸显了罗氏 KIMS 分析法的一个问题。分发的样品 A 中卡马西平浓度为 36 毫克/升,但罗氏公司的几位用户却低报了这一浓度。这表明该检测方法不能持续识别需要稀释的高浓度样本:在这项调查中,新鲜冷冻血浆中添加了浓度为 15 至 40 毫克/升的卡马西平。在两个临床实验室使用罗氏 KIMS 分析法对加标样本和 EQA 材料进行分析:结果:浓度为 20-30 毫克/升的加标样本不能被分析仪一致识别为稀释样本。在两家医院都发现了这种情况。两家医院都能正确识别浓度大于 30 毫克/升的加标样品和 EQA:结论:MFT 的手动稀释政策已经改变,因此所有卡马西平含量≥15 毫克/升的样本都将被手动稀释。该问题已报告给罗氏公司,他们正在进一步调查。我们建议其他实验室验证其稀释方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation into the linearity of the Roche c 702 carbamazepine assay.

Background: Carbamazepine is an anticonvulsant drug which is monitored in patients due to toxic side effects. At Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), carbamazepine is measured using Roche's Kinetic Interaction of Microparticles in Solution (KIMS) method on the c 702 platform. The assay has an upper limit of linearity of 20 mg/L. Samples with concentrations above this limit should be identified and manually diluted. However, a poor EQA return from UK NEQAS for Tox and TDM Distribution 456 has highlighted an issue with the Roche KIMS assay. Sample A of the distribution had a carbamazepine concentration of 36 mg/L but was underreported by several Roche users. This indicated that the assay was not consistently identifying high concentration samples which required a dilution.

Method: In this investigation, fresh frozen plasma was spiked with carbamazepine concentrations ranging from 15 to 40 mg/L. The spiked samples and EQA material were analysed at two clinical laboratories using the Roche KIMS assay.

Results: Samples spiked with concentrations 20-30 mg/L were not consistently identified for dilution by the analyser. This was observed at both hospital sites. Spike samples and EQA with concentrations >30 mg/L were correctly identified at both sites.

Conclusion: The manual dilution policy has been changed at MFT, so all samples with a carbamazepine level ≥15 mg/L will be manually diluted. The problem was reported to Roche who are investigating the issue further. We would suggest that other laboratories look at validating their dilution protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
期刊最新文献
Coefficients of variation analyses of internal quality control status for blood lead in China from 2015 to 2023. The effects of controlled acute psychological stress on serum cortisol and plasma metanephrine concentrations in healthy subjects. Suggested guide to using lactate gap as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of ethylene glycol overdose. Simultaneous quantification of serum symmetric dimethylarginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine for use in a routine clinical laboratory. Usefulness of the 3-hydroxykynurenine/kynurenic acid ratio as a diagnostic biomarker for diffuse larger B-cell lymphoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1