社会经济变量与初次剖腹产的关系。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001744
Katrina B Wilson, Joshua Fogel, Allan J Jacobs
{"title":"社会经济变量与初次剖腹产的关系。","authors":"Katrina B Wilson, Joshua Fogel, Allan J Jacobs","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Socioeconomic characteristics may be associated with cesarean section (CS) rates. We probe the relationship between socioeconomic variables and primary cesarean section (PCS) by studying indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) in a population-based study in New York City.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of all 80,506 women in New York City who gave birth to a live child during 2018, and who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were drawn from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the US Census. The main outcome measure was performance of PCS as compared with vaginal birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 21% of neonates were delivered by PCS. Multivariate multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis showed higher odds for PCS for women with an upper-middle class median household income of US$108,500 to $380,499 (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.76, <i>P</i> = 0.001), and the percentage enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.012, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Lower odds for PCS occurred for all middle-class categories of per capita income: US$32,500 to $54,499 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99, <i>P</i> = 0.02), US$54,500 to $108,499 (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and US$108,500 to $380,499 (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96, <i>P</i> = 0.02). No significant association occurred for women receiving public assistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient preferences in favor or against CS may be related to SES. There may be conflicts between obstetric care that is maximally beneficial and a patient's desire for delivery mode. Clinicians should be aware of the potential implications of this dilemma.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 10","pages":"591-598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Socioeconomic Variables with Primary Cesarean Section.\",\"authors\":\"Katrina B Wilson, Joshua Fogel, Allan J Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Socioeconomic characteristics may be associated with cesarean section (CS) rates. We probe the relationship between socioeconomic variables and primary cesarean section (PCS) by studying indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) in a population-based study in New York City.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of all 80,506 women in New York City who gave birth to a live child during 2018, and who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were drawn from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the US Census. The main outcome measure was performance of PCS as compared with vaginal birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 21% of neonates were delivered by PCS. Multivariate multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis showed higher odds for PCS for women with an upper-middle class median household income of US$108,500 to $380,499 (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.76, <i>P</i> = 0.001), and the percentage enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.012, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Lower odds for PCS occurred for all middle-class categories of per capita income: US$32,500 to $54,499 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99, <i>P</i> = 0.02), US$54,500 to $108,499 (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and US$108,500 to $380,499 (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96, <i>P</i> = 0.02). No significant association occurred for women receiving public assistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient preferences in favor or against CS may be related to SES. There may be conflicts between obstetric care that is maximally beneficial and a patient's desire for delivery mode. Clinicians should be aware of the potential implications of this dilemma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 10\",\"pages\":\"591-598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001744\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:社会经济特征可能与剖宫产率有关。我们通过研究纽约市一项基于人口的研究中的社会经济地位(SES)指标,探究社会经济变量与初次剖宫产(PCS)之间的关系:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是纽约市在 2018 年期间分娩活产婴儿的所有 80506 名妇女,她们均符合纳入和排除标准。数据来自纽约市健康与心理卫生局和美国人口普查。主要结果指标是PCS与阴道分娩的性能比较:结果:约 21% 的新生儿通过 PCS 分娩。多变量多层次混合效应逻辑回归分析显示,家庭收入中位数为 108,500 美元至 380,499 美元的中上层妇女采用 PCS 的几率更高(几率比 [OR] 1.37,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.07-1.76,P = 0.001),参加补充营养援助计划的比例也更高(OR 1.01,95% CI 1.001-1.012,P = 0.02)。所有中产阶级人均收入类别的 PCS 发生几率都较低:32,500 美元至 54,499 美元(OR 0.91,95% CI 0.84-0.99,P = 0.02),54,500 美元至 108,499 美元(OR 0.76,95% CI 0.66-0.88,P <0.001),以及 108,500 美元至 380,499 美元(OR 0.80,95% CI 0.66-0.96,P = 0.02)。接受公共援助的妇女与此无明显关联:结论:患者支持或反对 CS 的偏好可能与社会经济地位有关。产科护理的最大效益与患者对分娩方式的期望之间可能存在冲突。临床医生应意识到这种两难境地的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Socioeconomic Variables with Primary Cesarean Section.

Objectives: Socioeconomic characteristics may be associated with cesarean section (CS) rates. We probe the relationship between socioeconomic variables and primary cesarean section (PCS) by studying indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) in a population-based study in New York City.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of all 80,506 women in New York City who gave birth to a live child during 2018, and who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were drawn from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the US Census. The main outcome measure was performance of PCS as compared with vaginal birth.

Results: Approximately 21% of neonates were delivered by PCS. Multivariate multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis showed higher odds for PCS for women with an upper-middle class median household income of US$108,500 to $380,499 (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.76, P = 0.001), and the percentage enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.012, P = 0.02). Lower odds for PCS occurred for all middle-class categories of per capita income: US$32,500 to $54,499 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99, P = 0.02), US$54,500 to $108,499 (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88, P < 0.001), and US$108,500 to $380,499 (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96, P = 0.02). No significant association occurred for women receiving public assistance.

Conclusions: Patient preferences in favor or against CS may be related to SES. There may be conflicts between obstetric care that is maximally beneficial and a patient's desire for delivery mode. Clinicians should be aware of the potential implications of this dilemma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Cohort Study of Lt. Col. Luke J. Weathers VA Medical Center Patients with Positive FIT and Incomplete GI Evaluation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advancement of a Vertically Integrated Training Program (VITP): Introspective Assessment and Expansion. Clinical Shift Distribution in Academic Hospital Medicine Fellowship across 10 Years. Effect of HIV Status and Charlson Comorbidity Index on COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes in a Case-Control Study. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Cirrhosis and Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1