针对智障人士及其照顾者的依恋干预措施的系统性回顾。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1177/17446295241289734
Ruby Ramsden, Emily Reeves, Eve Whitwell, Nicola Lane, Helen K Fletcher
{"title":"针对智障人士及其照顾者的依恋干预措施的系统性回顾。","authors":"Ruby Ramsden, Emily Reeves, Eve Whitwell, Nicola Lane, Helen K Fletcher","doi":"10.1177/17446295241289734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current mixed-methods systematic review evaluated available literature to find out which attachment-based interventions have been implemented for people with intellectual disability and whether they are efficacious and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched (in July 2023 and April 2024), using terms related to intellectual disability and attachment-based interventions. The search yielded 793 papers; 15 papers (13 studies) met inclusion criteria. Relevant data was extracted from each study. Paper quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesised in an integrative review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included studies, 7 had people with intellectual disability as participants and 6 had their caregivers. Interventions included education, psychotherapy, technology assisted therapy, video interaction guidance/feedback and circle of security. Research methods varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence for efficacy and acceptability of interventions was mixed but promising. Most studies had limited generalisability. Therefore, further research is required. Pre-registration with PROSPERO [351287].</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295241289734"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of attachment interventions for people with intellectual disability and their caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Ruby Ramsden, Emily Reeves, Eve Whitwell, Nicola Lane, Helen K Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17446295241289734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current mixed-methods systematic review evaluated available literature to find out which attachment-based interventions have been implemented for people with intellectual disability and whether they are efficacious and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched (in July 2023 and April 2024), using terms related to intellectual disability and attachment-based interventions. The search yielded 793 papers; 15 papers (13 studies) met inclusion criteria. Relevant data was extracted from each study. Paper quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesised in an integrative review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included studies, 7 had people with intellectual disability as participants and 6 had their caregivers. Interventions included education, psychotherapy, technology assisted therapy, video interaction guidance/feedback and circle of security. Research methods varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence for efficacy and acceptability of interventions was mixed but promising. Most studies had limited generalisability. Therefore, further research is required. Pre-registration with PROSPERO [351287].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17446295241289734\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241289734\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241289734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本次混合方法系统性综述对现有文献进行了评估,以了解针对智障人士实施了哪些基于依恋的干预措施,以及这些干预措施是否有效和可接受:使用与智障和依恋干预相关的术语,检索了五个数据库(2023 年 7 月和 2024 年 4 月)。检索结果显示有 793 篇论文;15 篇论文(13 项研究)符合纳入标准。从每项研究中提取了相关数据。采用混合方法评估工具对论文质量进行评估。结果:在纳入的研究中,7 项研究的参与者为智障人士,6 项研究的参与者为智障人士的照顾者。干预措施包括教育、心理治疗、技术辅助治疗、视频互动指导/反馈和安全圈。研究方法各不相同:干预措施的有效性和可接受性证据不一,但都很有希望。大多数研究的普遍性有限。因此,还需要进一步的研究。PROSPERO [351287] 预注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of attachment interventions for people with intellectual disability and their caregivers.

Objective: The current mixed-methods systematic review evaluated available literature to find out which attachment-based interventions have been implemented for people with intellectual disability and whether they are efficacious and acceptable.

Methods: Five databases were searched (in July 2023 and April 2024), using terms related to intellectual disability and attachment-based interventions. The search yielded 793 papers; 15 papers (13 studies) met inclusion criteria. Relevant data was extracted from each study. Paper quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesised in an integrative review.

Results: Of the included studies, 7 had people with intellectual disability as participants and 6 had their caregivers. Interventions included education, psychotherapy, technology assisted therapy, video interaction guidance/feedback and circle of security. Research methods varied.

Conclusions: Evidence for efficacy and acceptability of interventions was mixed but promising. Most studies had limited generalisability. Therefore, further research is required. Pre-registration with PROSPERO [351287].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
期刊最新文献
Transition from sheltered workplace: Vocational skills are not the main concern. Adults with intellectual disabilities' satisfaction regarding their hospitalization: A correlational descriptive study. SALUDIVERSEX: A quality of life and sexual health intervention for adults with mild intellectual disabilities. The effect of increasing exercise in the intellectually disabled community. A study of the adaptation processes of individuals with intellectual disabilities and their mothers to COVID-19 restrictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1