围手术期促红细胞生成素对心脏手术术后发病率和死亡率的影响:随机对照试验荟萃分析。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101428
Dana Abraham , Dror B. Leviner , Tom Ronai , Naama Schwartz , Amos Levi , Erez Sharoni
{"title":"围手术期促红细胞生成素对心脏手术术后发病率和死亡率的影响:随机对照试验荟萃分析。","authors":"Dana Abraham ,&nbsp;Dror B. Leviner ,&nbsp;Tom Ronai ,&nbsp;Naama Schwartz ,&nbsp;Amos Levi ,&nbsp;Erez Sharoni","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cardiac surgery is known to have high rates of perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusions which are associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity. Perioperative erythropoietin (EPO) has been suggested to lower perioperative RBC transfusions, and the effect on postoperative morbidity or mortality is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The registered study protocol is available on PROSPERO (CRD42022314538). We searched the Pubmed, EMbase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of EPO in cardiac surgery. Outcomes were short-term mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), re-operation, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), infectious complications, and RBC transfusions. RCT studies of perioperative EPO that reported at least one prespecified outcome of interest were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21 RCT’s (n = 2,763 patients) were included. Mortality analysis included 17 studies (EPO 1,272 patients, control 1,235) and showed no significant difference (risk difference (RD) 0.0004, 95%CI: −0.016, 0.009). EPO did not reduce the incidence of AKI (RD −0.006, 95% CI: −0.038, 0.026) and reoperation (RD 0.001, 95% CI: −0.013, 0.015). The incidence of CVA (RD −0.004, 95% CI: −0.015, 0.007) and perioperative MI (RD −0.008, 95% CI: −0.021, 0.005) was similar between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although EPO had been proven to reduce perioperative RBC transfusions, we did not find that it reduces the incidence of postoperative short-term mortality, AKI, and reoperation. The study results support that perioperative EPO is also safe, with no rise in thrombotic events, including CVA and perioperative MI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 6","pages":"Article 101428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of perioperative erythropoietin on postoperative morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Dana Abraham ,&nbsp;Dror B. Leviner ,&nbsp;Tom Ronai ,&nbsp;Naama Schwartz ,&nbsp;Amos Levi ,&nbsp;Erez Sharoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cardiac surgery is known to have high rates of perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusions which are associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity. Perioperative erythropoietin (EPO) has been suggested to lower perioperative RBC transfusions, and the effect on postoperative morbidity or mortality is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The registered study protocol is available on PROSPERO (CRD42022314538). We searched the Pubmed, EMbase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of EPO in cardiac surgery. Outcomes were short-term mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), re-operation, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), infectious complications, and RBC transfusions. RCT studies of perioperative EPO that reported at least one prespecified outcome of interest were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21 RCT’s (n = 2,763 patients) were included. Mortality analysis included 17 studies (EPO 1,272 patients, control 1,235) and showed no significant difference (risk difference (RD) 0.0004, 95%CI: −0.016, 0.009). EPO did not reduce the incidence of AKI (RD −0.006, 95% CI: −0.038, 0.026) and reoperation (RD 0.001, 95% CI: −0.013, 0.015). The incidence of CVA (RD −0.004, 95% CI: −0.015, 0.007) and perioperative MI (RD −0.008, 95% CI: −0.021, 0.005) was similar between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although EPO had been proven to reduce perioperative RBC transfusions, we did not find that it reduces the incidence of postoperative short-term mortality, AKI, and reoperation. The study results support that perioperative EPO is also safe, with no rise in thrombotic events, including CVA and perioperative MI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000869\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:众所周知,心脏手术的围手术期红细胞(RBC)输注率很高,这与术后死亡率和发病率的增加有关。围手术期促红细胞生成素(EPO)被认为可降低围手术期红细胞输注率,但其对术后发病率或死亡率的影响尚不清楚:已登记的研究方案可在 PROSPERO (CRD42022314538) 上查阅。我们在 Pubmed、EMbase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 数据库中检索了心脏手术中 EPO 的随机对照试验 (RCT)。研究结果包括短期死亡率、急性肾损伤(AKI)、再次手术、脑血管意外(CVA)、围手术期心肌梗死(MI)、感染性并发症和红细胞输注。结果:共纳入了 21 项关于围手术期 EPO 的研究:结果:共纳入 21 项 RCT 研究(n = 2,763 名患者)。死亡率分析包括 17 项研究(EPO 1,272 例患者,对照组 1,235 例),结果显示两者无显著差异(风险差异 (RD) 0.0004,95%CI:-0.016, 0.009)。EPO 并未降低 AKI(RD -0.006,95% CI:-0.038,0.026)和再次手术(RD 0.001,95% CI:-0.013,0.015)的发生率。两组间CVA(RD -0.004,95% CI:-0.015,0.007)和围手术期心肌梗死(RD -0.008,95% CI:-0.021,0.005)的发生率相似:结论:尽管 EPO 已被证实可减少围手术期红细胞输注,但我们并未发现它能降低术后短期死亡率、AKI 和再次手术的发生率。研究结果表明,围手术期使用 EPO 也是安全的,血栓事件(包括 CVA 和围手术期心肌梗死)不会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of perioperative erythropoietin on postoperative morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

Cardiac surgery is known to have high rates of perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusions which are associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity. Perioperative erythropoietin (EPO) has been suggested to lower perioperative RBC transfusions, and the effect on postoperative morbidity or mortality is unknown.

Methods

The registered study protocol is available on PROSPERO (CRD42022314538). We searched the Pubmed, EMbase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of EPO in cardiac surgery. Outcomes were short-term mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), re-operation, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), infectious complications, and RBC transfusions. RCT studies of perioperative EPO that reported at least one prespecified outcome of interest were included.

Results

A total of 21 RCT’s (n = 2,763 patients) were included. Mortality analysis included 17 studies (EPO 1,272 patients, control 1,235) and showed no significant difference (risk difference (RD) 0.0004, 95%CI: −0.016, 0.009). EPO did not reduce the incidence of AKI (RD −0.006, 95% CI: −0.038, 0.026) and reoperation (RD 0.001, 95% CI: −0.013, 0.015). The incidence of CVA (RD −0.004, 95% CI: −0.015, 0.007) and perioperative MI (RD −0.008, 95% CI: −0.021, 0.005) was similar between the groups.

Conclusions

Although EPO had been proven to reduce perioperative RBC transfusions, we did not find that it reduces the incidence of postoperative short-term mortality, AKI, and reoperation. The study results support that perioperative EPO is also safe, with no rise in thrombotic events, including CVA and perioperative MI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
The association between neuraxial labor analgesia and subacute pain after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism: 2024 guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) developed in collaboration with the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), the French Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SFTH) and the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and endorsed by the French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD), the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and INNOVTE (Investigation Network On Venous ThromboEmbolism) network. Developing a sustainable team in critical care: focus on gender-based diversity Intraoperative ketamine and pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): A systematic review and meta-analysis Is quantitative neuromuscular monitoring mandatory after administration of the recommended dose of sugammadex? A prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1