{"title":"\"我感觉自己总是提心吊胆\":有药物使用障碍的假释人员对假释监督的看法。","authors":"Maeve E. Donnelly, Kimberly M. Davidson","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While extant research has looked at parole and its various actors as an institution, few studies recount the parole experience from the perspective of parolees. Additionally, despite the prevalence of substance use disorders (SUDs) within the criminal justice system, research that assesses the additional challenges this population faces throughout parole supervision is even scarcer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To address this gap, we analyze in-depth qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 51) conducted with reentering men with SUDs as they navigate parole in Pennsylvania. Three independent coders identified all narratives relating to a broad theme of “parole and probation experiences.” The authors then completed iterative rounds of more fine-grained independent coding within that theme.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our results emphasize that SUDs present a significant barrier to reentry success, and the tension of surveillance and revocation is amplified for those enduring simultaneous reentry and recovery. Importantly, our respondents regard parole officers more positively than they view parole as an institution, yet this perception of officers does not equate to provision of reintegration and recovery support. Respondents perceive that parole presents unnecessary additional hurdles to their reentry success, and their perceived risk level impacts their surveillance intensity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The information gleaned through inclusion of perspectives from those enduring parole supervision calls for a critical assessment of current parole practices. Further, the current approach to SUDs within community supervision criminalizes relapse without provision of treatment resources or support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 209529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I feel like I'm always on edge”: Perceptions of parole supervision by parolees with substance use disorders\",\"authors\":\"Maeve E. Donnelly, Kimberly M. Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While extant research has looked at parole and its various actors as an institution, few studies recount the parole experience from the perspective of parolees. Additionally, despite the prevalence of substance use disorders (SUDs) within the criminal justice system, research that assesses the additional challenges this population faces throughout parole supervision is even scarcer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To address this gap, we analyze in-depth qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 51) conducted with reentering men with SUDs as they navigate parole in Pennsylvania. Three independent coders identified all narratives relating to a broad theme of “parole and probation experiences.” The authors then completed iterative rounds of more fine-grained independent coding within that theme.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our results emphasize that SUDs present a significant barrier to reentry success, and the tension of surveillance and revocation is amplified for those enduring simultaneous reentry and recovery. Importantly, our respondents regard parole officers more positively than they view parole as an institution, yet this perception of officers does not equate to provision of reintegration and recovery support. Respondents perceive that parole presents unnecessary additional hurdles to their reentry success, and their perceived risk level impacts their surveillance intensity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The information gleaned through inclusion of perspectives from those enduring parole supervision calls for a critical assessment of current parole practices. Further, the current approach to SUDs within community supervision criminalizes relapse without provision of treatment resources or support.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 209529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:虽然现有的研究将假释及其各种参与者视为一种制度,但很少有研究从假释人员的角度来叙述假释经历。此外,尽管药物使用障碍(SUDs)在刑事司法系统中十分普遍,但评估这一人群在整个假释监管期间所面临的额外挑战的研究却少之又少:为了填补这一空白,我们分析了宾夕法尼亚州对患有 SUD 的男性假释犯进行的深度定性访谈(n = 51)。三位独立编码者确定了所有与 "假释和缓刑经历 "这一广泛主题相关的叙述。然后,作者在该主题范围内完成了多轮更精细的独立编码:结果:我们的研究结果强调,药物依赖性精神障碍是重返社会取得成功的重大障碍,对于那些同时经历重返社会和康复的人来说,监视和撤销缓刑的矛盾更加突出。重要的是,我们的受访者对假释官的评价比对假释机构的评价更积极,但对假释官的这种看法并不等同于提供重返社会和康复支持。受访者认为假释对他们重返社会的成功造成了不必要的额外障碍,而他们认为的风险水平影响了他们的监视强度:通过纳入假释监管对象的观点所收集到的信息要求我们对当前的假释实践进行批判性评估。此外,目前在社区监管范围内处理吸毒成瘾问题的方法将复吸定为刑事犯罪,而不提供治疗资源或支持。
“I feel like I'm always on edge”: Perceptions of parole supervision by parolees with substance use disorders
Introduction
While extant research has looked at parole and its various actors as an institution, few studies recount the parole experience from the perspective of parolees. Additionally, despite the prevalence of substance use disorders (SUDs) within the criminal justice system, research that assesses the additional challenges this population faces throughout parole supervision is even scarcer.
Methods
To address this gap, we analyze in-depth qualitative interviews (n = 51) conducted with reentering men with SUDs as they navigate parole in Pennsylvania. Three independent coders identified all narratives relating to a broad theme of “parole and probation experiences.” The authors then completed iterative rounds of more fine-grained independent coding within that theme.
Results
Our results emphasize that SUDs present a significant barrier to reentry success, and the tension of surveillance and revocation is amplified for those enduring simultaneous reentry and recovery. Importantly, our respondents regard parole officers more positively than they view parole as an institution, yet this perception of officers does not equate to provision of reintegration and recovery support. Respondents perceive that parole presents unnecessary additional hurdles to their reentry success, and their perceived risk level impacts their surveillance intensity.
Conclusions
The information gleaned through inclusion of perspectives from those enduring parole supervision calls for a critical assessment of current parole practices. Further, the current approach to SUDs within community supervision criminalizes relapse without provision of treatment resources or support.