用于语义需求相似性检测的连体神经网络方法

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Access Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3469636
Nojoom A. Alnajem;Manal Binkhonain;M. Shamim Hossain
{"title":"用于语义需求相似性检测的连体神经网络方法","authors":"Nojoom A. Alnajem;Manal Binkhonain;M. Shamim Hossain","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3469636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detecting semantic similarity between textual requirements is a crucial task for various natural language processing (NLP)-based requirements engineering (RE) applications. It is also challenging due to the nature of these requirements, which are written in natural language (NL), include domain knowledge, and often follow pre-defined templates that contain duplicated words. Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown promising results in measuring semantic similarity between texts. Siamese neural networks (SNNs), a class of DNNs, are widely used for measuring similarity between various data types, demonstrating their capability and independence of language and domain. Nevertheless, SNNs have a limited use in measuring semantic requirements similarity (SRS). In this paper, a novel metric-based learning method is proposed using SNNs that combines a sentence Transformer model (LLM) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks with a backward network layer to measure semantic similarity between pairs of requirements. The proposed method is evaluated on an annotated SRS dataset that was built based on public datasets (i.e., PROMISE and PURE) and compared with other state-of-the-art methods (i.e., fine-tuning and zero-shot methods) using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score classification metrics. The results show that the proposed method achieved an accuracy of 95.42% and an F1-score of 95.71%, outperforming the state-of-the-art methods.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10697170","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Siamese Neural Networks Method for Semantic Requirements Similarity Detection\",\"authors\":\"Nojoom A. Alnajem;Manal Binkhonain;M. Shamim Hossain\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3469636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Detecting semantic similarity between textual requirements is a crucial task for various natural language processing (NLP)-based requirements engineering (RE) applications. It is also challenging due to the nature of these requirements, which are written in natural language (NL), include domain knowledge, and often follow pre-defined templates that contain duplicated words. Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown promising results in measuring semantic similarity between texts. Siamese neural networks (SNNs), a class of DNNs, are widely used for measuring similarity between various data types, demonstrating their capability and independence of language and domain. Nevertheless, SNNs have a limited use in measuring semantic requirements similarity (SRS). In this paper, a novel metric-based learning method is proposed using SNNs that combines a sentence Transformer model (LLM) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks with a backward network layer to measure semantic similarity between pairs of requirements. The proposed method is evaluated on an annotated SRS dataset that was built based on public datasets (i.e., PROMISE and PURE) and compared with other state-of-the-art methods (i.e., fine-tuning and zero-shot methods) using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score classification metrics. The results show that the proposed method achieved an accuracy of 95.42% and an F1-score of 95.71%, outperforming the state-of-the-art methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Access\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10697170\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10697170/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10697170/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于各种基于自然语言处理(NLP)的需求工程(RE)应用来说,检测文本需求之间的语义相似性是一项至关重要的任务。由于这些需求是用自然语言(NL)写成的,包含领域知识,而且往往遵循包含重复词汇的预定义模板,因此具有一定的挑战性。最近,深度神经网络(DNN)在测量文本之间的语义相似性方面取得了可喜的成果。暹罗神经网络(SNN)是深度神经网络中的一类,被广泛用于测量各种数据类型之间的相似性,这表明它们具有独立于语言和领域的能力。然而,SNN 在测量语义需求相似性(SRS)方面的应用却很有限。本文利用 SNNs 提出了一种新颖的基于度量的学习方法,该方法结合了句子转换器模型 (LLM) 和带有后向网络层的长短期记忆 (LSTM) 网络,用于测量成对需求之间的语义相似性。我们在基于公共数据集(即 PROMISE 和 PURE)构建的注释 SRS 数据集上对所提出的方法进行了评估,并使用准确度、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数分类指标与其他最先进的方法(即微调法和零点法)进行了比较。结果表明,所提方法的准确率达到了 95.42%,F1 分数达到了 95.71%,优于最先进的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Siamese Neural Networks Method for Semantic Requirements Similarity Detection
Detecting semantic similarity between textual requirements is a crucial task for various natural language processing (NLP)-based requirements engineering (RE) applications. It is also challenging due to the nature of these requirements, which are written in natural language (NL), include domain knowledge, and often follow pre-defined templates that contain duplicated words. Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown promising results in measuring semantic similarity between texts. Siamese neural networks (SNNs), a class of DNNs, are widely used for measuring similarity between various data types, demonstrating their capability and independence of language and domain. Nevertheless, SNNs have a limited use in measuring semantic requirements similarity (SRS). In this paper, a novel metric-based learning method is proposed using SNNs that combines a sentence Transformer model (LLM) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks with a backward network layer to measure semantic similarity between pairs of requirements. The proposed method is evaluated on an annotated SRS dataset that was built based on public datasets (i.e., PROMISE and PURE) and compared with other state-of-the-art methods (i.e., fine-tuning and zero-shot methods) using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score classification metrics. The results show that the proposed method achieved an accuracy of 95.42% and an F1-score of 95.71%, outperforming the state-of-the-art methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
期刊最新文献
Correction to “Digital Tools, Technologies, and Learning Methodologies for Education 4.0 Frameworks: A STEM Oriented Survey” Retraction Notice: Space Elements of Computer Music Production Based on VR Technology Retraction Notice: Fast Recognition Method of Football Robot’s Graphics From the VR Perspective Retraction Notice: Target Recognition Method of Rehabilitation Robot Based on Image Local Features Correction to “Blockchain-IoT Healthcare Applications and Trends: A Review”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1