Lucas Gerez, Silvestro Micera, Richard Nuckols, Tommaso Proietti
{"title":"评估神经系统疾病患者的可穿戴机器人性能。","authors":"Lucas Gerez, Silvestro Micera, Richard Nuckols, Tommaso Proietti","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While wearable robotics is expanding within clinical settings, particularly for neurological rehabilitation, there is still a lack of consensus on how to effectively assess the performance of these devices. This review focuses on the most common metrics, whose selection and design are crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes and potentially improve the standard care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The literature reveals that while wearable robots are equipped with various embedded sensors, most studies still rely on traditional, nontechnological methods for assessment. Recent studies have shown that, although quantitative data from embedded sensors are available (e.g., kinematics), these are underutilized in favor of qualitative assessments. A trend toward integrating automatic assessments from the devices themselves is emerging, with a few notable studies pioneering this approach.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Our analysis suggests a critical need for developing standardized metrics that leverage the data from embedded sensors in wearable robots. This shift could enhance the accuracy of patient assessments and the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes in neurological rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"645-654"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of wearable robotics performance in patients with neurological conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Gerez, Silvestro Micera, Richard Nuckols, Tommaso Proietti\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While wearable robotics is expanding within clinical settings, particularly for neurological rehabilitation, there is still a lack of consensus on how to effectively assess the performance of these devices. This review focuses on the most common metrics, whose selection and design are crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes and potentially improve the standard care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The literature reveals that while wearable robots are equipped with various embedded sensors, most studies still rely on traditional, nontechnological methods for assessment. Recent studies have shown that, although quantitative data from embedded sensors are available (e.g., kinematics), these are underutilized in favor of qualitative assessments. A trend toward integrating automatic assessments from the devices themselves is emerging, with a few notable studies pioneering this approach.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Our analysis suggests a critical need for developing standardized metrics that leverage the data from embedded sensors in wearable robots. This shift could enhance the accuracy of patient assessments and the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes in neurological rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"645-654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001328\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of wearable robotics performance in patients with neurological conditions.
Purpose of review: While wearable robotics is expanding within clinical settings, particularly for neurological rehabilitation, there is still a lack of consensus on how to effectively assess the performance of these devices. This review focuses on the most common metrics, whose selection and design are crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes and potentially improve the standard care.
Recent findings: The literature reveals that while wearable robots are equipped with various embedded sensors, most studies still rely on traditional, nontechnological methods for assessment. Recent studies have shown that, although quantitative data from embedded sensors are available (e.g., kinematics), these are underutilized in favor of qualitative assessments. A trend toward integrating automatic assessments from the devices themselves is emerging, with a few notable studies pioneering this approach.
Summary: Our analysis suggests a critical need for developing standardized metrics that leverage the data from embedded sensors in wearable robots. This shift could enhance the accuracy of patient assessments and the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes in neurological rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.