沙奎利/缬沙坦对左心室射血分数降低的心衰患者的影响:沙特阿拉伯单中心回顾性研究。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S471867
Sultan Al Raddadi, Majed Almutairi, Kholoud AlAamer, Abdulmahsen Alsalman, Maram Albalawi, Meshary Almeshary, Hisham A Badreldin, Hind Almodaimegh
{"title":"沙奎利/缬沙坦对左心室射血分数降低的心衰患者的影响:沙特阿拉伯单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Sultan Al Raddadi, Majed Almutairi, Kholoud AlAamer, Abdulmahsen Alsalman, Maram Albalawi, Meshary Almeshary, Hisham A Badreldin, Hind Almodaimegh","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S471867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is used in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), reducing morbidity and mortality while improving symptoms and prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of S/V in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and its safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This retrospective cohort study included adult patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with HFrEF, receiving S/V, and followed up at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh. Primary outcomes included improvements in LVEF on echocardiography and the number of hospitalizations due to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Secondary outcomes assessed the safety profile of S/V. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 107 patients: 80 with LVEF < 30% and 27 with LVEF 30-40%. Six-month follow-up, LVEF improvement was categorized into three groups: no improvement, LVEF increased by 1 to <10 points, and LVEF increased by ≥10 points. The LVEF was similar across groups (P = 0.59). Although hospitalizations due to ADHF were not significantly different between groups, they numerically decreased after initiating S/V (P = 0.1). S/V was generally well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests no significant benefit from S/V regarding LVEF improvement. It is recommended that heart failure clinics assess and titrate S/V to the maximum tolerated dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Sultan Al Raddadi, Majed Almutairi, Kholoud AlAamer, Abdulmahsen Alsalman, Maram Albalawi, Meshary Almeshary, Hisham A Badreldin, Hind Almodaimegh\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DHPS.S471867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is used in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), reducing morbidity and mortality while improving symptoms and prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of S/V in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and its safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This retrospective cohort study included adult patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with HFrEF, receiving S/V, and followed up at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh. Primary outcomes included improvements in LVEF on echocardiography and the number of hospitalizations due to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Secondary outcomes assessed the safety profile of S/V. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 107 patients: 80 with LVEF < 30% and 27 with LVEF 30-40%. Six-month follow-up, LVEF improvement was categorized into three groups: no improvement, LVEF increased by 1 to <10 points, and LVEF increased by ≥10 points. The LVEF was similar across groups (P = 0.59). Although hospitalizations due to ADHF were not significantly different between groups, they numerically decreased after initiating S/V (P = 0.1). S/V was generally well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests no significant benefit from S/V regarding LVEF improvement. It is recommended that heart failure clinics assess and titrate S/V to the maximum tolerated dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S471867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S471867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:沙库比特利/缬沙坦(S/V)用于治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF),可降低发病率和死亡率,同时改善症状和预后。本研究旨在评估S/V对左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低患者的有效性及其安全性:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了利雅得一家三级医院确诊为 HFrEF、接受 S/V 治疗并接受随访的年龄≥18 岁的成年患者。主要结果包括超声心动图显示的 LVEF 改善情况和因急性失代偿性心力衰竭 (ADHF) 而住院的人数。次要结果是评估 S/V 的安全性。进行了多项式逻辑回归分析,统计显著性设定为 P <0.05。.结果研究共纳入 107 名患者:80例患者 LVEF < 30%,27例患者 LVEF 30-40%。随访六个月后,LVEF改善情况分为三组:无改善、LVEF增加1至结论:本研究表明,S/V 对 LVEF 的改善无明显益处。建议心衰诊所对 S/V 进行评估,并将其剂量调整到最大耐受剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is used in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), reducing morbidity and mortality while improving symptoms and prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of S/V in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and its safety.

Methods:  This retrospective cohort study included adult patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with HFrEF, receiving S/V, and followed up at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh. Primary outcomes included improvements in LVEF on echocardiography and the number of hospitalizations due to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Secondary outcomes assessed the safety profile of S/V. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. .

Results: The study included 107 patients: 80 with LVEF < 30% and 27 with LVEF 30-40%. Six-month follow-up, LVEF improvement was categorized into three groups: no improvement, LVEF increased by 1 to <10 points, and LVEF increased by ≥10 points. The LVEF was similar across groups (P = 0.59). Although hospitalizations due to ADHF were not significantly different between groups, they numerically decreased after initiating S/V (P = 0.1). S/V was generally well tolerated.

Conclusion: This study suggests no significant benefit from S/V regarding LVEF improvement. It is recommended that heart failure clinics assess and titrate S/V to the maximum tolerated dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Response to Letter]. Baloxavir Resistance Markers in Influenza A and B Viruses in the Americas. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Letter]. Adverse Drug Reactions Related with Antibiotic Medicines in Malawi: A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence and Associated Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1