对儿童中心静脉相关血流感染率进行风险调整的重要性。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1017/ice.2024.111
Lakshmi Srinivasan, Ashley Oliver, Yuan-Shung V Huang, Di Shu, Kait M Donnelly, Cecelia Harrison, Amy L Roberts, Ron Keren
{"title":"对儿童中心静脉相关血流感染率进行风险调整的重要性。","authors":"Lakshmi Srinivasan, Ashley Oliver, Yuan-Shung V Huang, Di Shu, Kait M Donnelly, Cecelia Harrison, Amy L Roberts, Ron Keren","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is one of the most prevalent pediatric healthcare-associated infections and is used to benchmark hospital performance. Pediatric patients have increased in acuity and complexity over time. Existing approaches to risk adjustment do not control for individual patient characteristics, which are strong predictors of CLABSI risk and vary over time. Our objective was to develop a risk adjustment model for CLABSI in hospitalized children and compare observed to expected rates over time.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study using electronic health record data at a quaternary Children's Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included hospitalized children with central catheters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risk factors identified from published literature were considered for inclusion in multivariable modeling based on association with CLABSI risk in bivariable analysis and expert input. We calculated observed and expected (risk model-adjusted) annual CLABSI rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16,411 patients with 520,209 line days, 633 patients experienced 796 CLABSIs. The final model included age, behavioral health condition, non-English speaking, oncology service, port catheter type, catheter dwell time, lymphatic condition, total parenteral nutrition, and number of organ systems requiring ICU level care. For every organ system receiving ICU level care the odds ratio for CLABSI was 1.24 (95% CI 1.12-1.37). Although not statistically different, observed rates were lower than expected rates for later years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure to adjust for patient factors, particularly acuity and complexity of disease, may miss clinically significant differences in CLABSI rates, and may lead to inaccurate interpretation of the impact of quality improvement efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of risk adjusting central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in children.\",\"authors\":\"Lakshmi Srinivasan, Ashley Oliver, Yuan-Shung V Huang, Di Shu, Kait M Donnelly, Cecelia Harrison, Amy L Roberts, Ron Keren\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2024.111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is one of the most prevalent pediatric healthcare-associated infections and is used to benchmark hospital performance. Pediatric patients have increased in acuity and complexity over time. Existing approaches to risk adjustment do not control for individual patient characteristics, which are strong predictors of CLABSI risk and vary over time. Our objective was to develop a risk adjustment model for CLABSI in hospitalized children and compare observed to expected rates over time.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study using electronic health record data at a quaternary Children's Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included hospitalized children with central catheters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risk factors identified from published literature were considered for inclusion in multivariable modeling based on association with CLABSI risk in bivariable analysis and expert input. We calculated observed and expected (risk model-adjusted) annual CLABSI rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16,411 patients with 520,209 line days, 633 patients experienced 796 CLABSIs. The final model included age, behavioral health condition, non-English speaking, oncology service, port catheter type, catheter dwell time, lymphatic condition, total parenteral nutrition, and number of organ systems requiring ICU level care. For every organ system receiving ICU level care the odds ratio for CLABSI was 1.24 (95% CI 1.12-1.37). Although not statistically different, observed rates were lower than expected rates for later years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure to adjust for patient factors, particularly acuity and complexity of disease, may miss clinically significant differences in CLABSI rates, and may lead to inaccurate interpretation of the impact of quality improvement efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:中心静脉相关性血流感染(CLABSI)是最常见的儿科医疗相关性感染之一,也是医院绩效的基准。随着时间的推移,儿科患者的严重程度和复杂性都在增加。现有的风险调整方法无法控制患者的个体特征,而这些特征是预测 CLABSI 风险的重要因素,并且会随着时间的推移而变化。我们的目标是为住院儿童的 CLABSI 建立一个风险调整模型,并将观察到的比率与一段时间内的预期比率进行比较:我们利用一家四级儿童医院的电子健康记录数据开展了一项前瞻性队列研究:我们纳入了使用中心导管的住院儿童:根据双变量分析中与 CLABSI 风险的相关性和专家意见,考虑将已发表文献中确定的风险因素纳入多变量模型。我们计算了观察到的和预期的(风险模型调整后的)年 CLABSI 感染率:在 16,411 名患者的 520,209 个住院日中,有 633 名患者发生了 796 次 CLABSI。最终模型包括年龄、行为健康状况、非英语语言、肿瘤服务、端口导管类型、导管停留时间、淋巴状况、全肠外营养以及需要 ICU 级护理的器官系统数量。每个接受 ICU 级护理的器官系统发生 CLABSI 的几率比为 1.24(95% CI 1.12-1.37)。虽然没有统计学差异,但观察到的比率低于以后几年的预期比率:结论:如果不对患者因素(尤其是疾病的严重程度和复杂性)进行调整,可能会忽略 CLABSI 感染率在临床上的显著差异,并可能导致对质量改进工作的影响做出不准确的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Importance of risk adjusting central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in children.

Objective: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is one of the most prevalent pediatric healthcare-associated infections and is used to benchmark hospital performance. Pediatric patients have increased in acuity and complexity over time. Existing approaches to risk adjustment do not control for individual patient characteristics, which are strong predictors of CLABSI risk and vary over time. Our objective was to develop a risk adjustment model for CLABSI in hospitalized children and compare observed to expected rates over time.

Design and setting: We conducted a prospective cohort study using electronic health record data at a quaternary Children's Hospital.

Patients: We included hospitalized children with central catheters.

Methods: Risk factors identified from published literature were considered for inclusion in multivariable modeling based on association with CLABSI risk in bivariable analysis and expert input. We calculated observed and expected (risk model-adjusted) annual CLABSI rates.

Results: Among 16,411 patients with 520,209 line days, 633 patients experienced 796 CLABSIs. The final model included age, behavioral health condition, non-English speaking, oncology service, port catheter type, catheter dwell time, lymphatic condition, total parenteral nutrition, and number of organ systems requiring ICU level care. For every organ system receiving ICU level care the odds ratio for CLABSI was 1.24 (95% CI 1.12-1.37). Although not statistically different, observed rates were lower than expected rates for later years.

Conclusions: Failure to adjust for patient factors, particularly acuity and complexity of disease, may miss clinically significant differences in CLABSI rates, and may lead to inaccurate interpretation of the impact of quality improvement efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
期刊最新文献
Multiplexed gastrointestinal PCR panels for the evaluation of diarrhea in patients with acute leukemia. A pilot intervention trial to reduce the use of post-procedural antimicrobials after common endourologic surgeries. Antimicrobial-resistant central line-associated bloodstream infections in adult intensive care units: findings from an Australian surveillance network, 2011-2022. Empiric antibiotic prescribing practices for gram-positive coverage of late-onset sepsis in neonatal intensive care units in North America. Integrating an industrial hygienist into the infection prevention and control program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1