主动脉-股骨僵硬度梯度与老年人的心血管风险

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23392
Keeron Stone, Simon Fryer, Barry J McDonnell, Michelle L Meyer, James Faulkner, Mohsen Agharazii, Catherine Fortier, Christopher J A Pugh, Craig Paterson, Gabriel Zieff, Aiden Chauntry, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Martin Bahls, Lee Stoner
{"title":"主动脉-股骨僵硬度梯度与老年人的心血管风险","authors":"Keeron Stone, Simon Fryer, Barry J McDonnell, Michelle L Meyer, James Faulkner, Mohsen Agharazii, Catherine Fortier, Christopher J A Pugh, Craig Paterson, Gabriel Zieff, Aiden Chauntry, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Martin Bahls, Lee Stoner","doi":"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient, calculated as the ratio of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity (PWV) to central (aortic) PWV, is a promising tool for assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but whether it predicts incident CVD is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the association of the aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient measures carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by carotid-femoral PWV) and the heart-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by heart-femoral PWV), as well as PWV, with incident CVD (coronary disease, stroke, and heart failure) and all-cause mortality among 3109 participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort (age, 75±5 years; carotid-femoral PWV, 11.5±3.0 m/s), free of CVD. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median 7.4-year follow-up, there were 322 cases of incident CVD and 410 deaths. In fully adjusted models, only top quartiles of carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.97]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.08-2.05]) and heart-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.27-2.48]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.00-2.00]) were significantly associated with a greater risk of incident CVD. Only high aortic stiffness in combination with low lower-limb stiffness was significantly associated with incident CVD (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.06-2.02]) compared with the referent low aortic stiffness and high lower-limb stiffness. No PWVs were significantly associated with incident CVD. No exposures were associated with all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient may enhance CVD risk assessment in older adults in whom the predictive capacity of traditional risk factors and PWV are attenuated.</p>","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic-Femoral Stiffness Gradient and Cardiovascular Risk in Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Keeron Stone, Simon Fryer, Barry J McDonnell, Michelle L Meyer, James Faulkner, Mohsen Agharazii, Catherine Fortier, Christopher J A Pugh, Craig Paterson, Gabriel Zieff, Aiden Chauntry, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Martin Bahls, Lee Stoner\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient, calculated as the ratio of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity (PWV) to central (aortic) PWV, is a promising tool for assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but whether it predicts incident CVD is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the association of the aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient measures carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by carotid-femoral PWV) and the heart-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by heart-femoral PWV), as well as PWV, with incident CVD (coronary disease, stroke, and heart failure) and all-cause mortality among 3109 participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort (age, 75±5 years; carotid-femoral PWV, 11.5±3.0 m/s), free of CVD. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median 7.4-year follow-up, there were 322 cases of incident CVD and 410 deaths. In fully adjusted models, only top quartiles of carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.97]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.08-2.05]) and heart-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.27-2.48]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.00-2.00]) were significantly associated with a greater risk of incident CVD. Only high aortic stiffness in combination with low lower-limb stiffness was significantly associated with incident CVD (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.06-2.02]) compared with the referent low aortic stiffness and high lower-limb stiffness. No PWVs were significantly associated with incident CVD. No exposures were associated with all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient may enhance CVD risk assessment in older adults in whom the predictive capacity of traditional risk factors and PWV are attenuated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23392\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23392","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据下肢脉搏波速度(PWV)与中心(主动脉)脉搏波速度之比计算得出的主动脉-股动脉僵化梯度是评估心血管疾病(CVD)风险的一种很有前途的工具,但它是否能预测心血管疾病的发生还不得而知:我们研究了主动脉-股动脉僵硬度梯度、颈动脉-股动脉僵硬度梯度(股骨踝脉搏波速度除以颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度)和心-股动脉僵硬度梯度(股骨踝脉搏波速度除以心-股动脉脉搏波速度)以及脉搏波速度与心血管疾病发病率的关系、以及脉搏波速度与心血管疾病(冠心病、中风和心力衰竭)发病率和全因死亡率的关系;颈动脉-股骨脉搏波速度,11.5±3.0 m/s),无心血管疾病。采用 Cox 回归估算危险比 (HR) 和 95% CI:结果:在中位 7.4 年的随访期间,共有 322 例心血管疾病病例和 410 例死亡病例。05])和心股僵硬度梯度(四分位数 4:HR,1.77 [95% CI,1.27-2.48];四分位数 3:HR,1.41 [95% CI,1.00-2.00])与心血管疾病的发病风险显著相关。与参考的低主动脉僵硬度和高下肢僵硬度相比,只有高主动脉僵硬度合并低下肢僵硬度才与心血管疾病的发生显著相关(HR,1.46 [95% CI,1.06-2.02])。没有任何脉搏波速度与心血管疾病的发生显著相关。没有任何暴露与全因死亡率相关:主动脉-股动脉僵硬度梯度可加强对老年人心血管疾病风险的评估,因为传统风险因素和脉搏波速度对老年人的预测能力减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aortic-Femoral Stiffness Gradient and Cardiovascular Risk in Older Adults.

Background: The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient, calculated as the ratio of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity (PWV) to central (aortic) PWV, is a promising tool for assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but whether it predicts incident CVD is unknown.

Methods: We examined the association of the aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient measures carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by carotid-femoral PWV) and the heart-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by heart-femoral PWV), as well as PWV, with incident CVD (coronary disease, stroke, and heart failure) and all-cause mortality among 3109 participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort (age, 75±5 years; carotid-femoral PWV, 11.5±3.0 m/s), free of CVD. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs.

Results: Over a median 7.4-year follow-up, there were 322 cases of incident CVD and 410 deaths. In fully adjusted models, only top quartiles of carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.97]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.08-2.05]) and heart-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.27-2.48]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.00-2.00]) were significantly associated with a greater risk of incident CVD. Only high aortic stiffness in combination with low lower-limb stiffness was significantly associated with incident CVD (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.06-2.02]) compared with the referent low aortic stiffness and high lower-limb stiffness. No PWVs were significantly associated with incident CVD. No exposures were associated with all-cause mortality.

Conclusions: The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient may enhance CVD risk assessment in older adults in whom the predictive capacity of traditional risk factors and PWV are attenuated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
期刊最新文献
Evolutionary Characteristics in Primary Aldosteronism Patients. Rhythmic Contractions of Lymph Vessels and Lymph Flow Are Disrupted in Hypertensive Rats. Hyperadrenergic Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Clinical Biomarkers and Response to Guanfacine. Predictive and Diagnostic Value of the Angiogenic Proteins in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. GPER Stimulation Attenuates Cardiac Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1