新开发的生物等效罗替戈汀贴剂与原研产品的皮肤粘附性对比:针对帕金森病患者的多中心随机交叉试验结果。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.5414/CP204672
Wolfgang H Jost, Maggie Wang, Gabriel Wauer, Annika Dax, Ralph-Steven Wedemeyer, Barbara Schug, André Warnke, Ana Leblanc, Bjoern Schurad
{"title":"新开发的生物等效罗替戈汀贴剂与原研产品的皮肤粘附性对比:针对帕金森病患者的多中心随机交叉试验结果。","authors":"Wolfgang H Jost, Maggie Wang, Gabriel Wauer, Annika Dax, Ralph-Steven Wedemeyer, Barbara Schug, André Warnke, Ana Leblanc, Bjoern Schurad","doi":"10.5414/CP204672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To demonstrate adequate skin adhesion of a new once-daily rotigotine transdermal patch (ROT-TDS) compared to the originator product (reference) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence (PK BE) was assessed with the 4 mg/24h patches in healthy adults in a single-/multiple-dose, crossover trial. The trial investigating skin adhesion in PD patients (stable dose ≥ 8 mg/day rotigotine) was performed with the 8 mg/24h patches as a multiple-dose, crossover trial (4 alternating once-daily patch applications). Skin status (seborrhea, sweating) was characterized at screening. Adhesion was assessed 5 minutes after application and 5 minutes before removal of each patch. Systemic safety and skin irritation/sensitization were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ROT-TDS was bioequivalent to the reference product in the PK BE trial in 48 randomized healthy subjects. In the skin adhesion trial in 43 randomized PD patients, the cumulative mean percentage of adhesion (90% CI) at the end-of-dosing interval was 92.948% (90.156 - 95.740%) for ROT-TDS and 90.471% (87.574 - 93.367%) for the reference. For ROT-TDS, 80.23% of patches were ≥ 90% adhered at the end-of-dosing interval, while this was the case for 67.44% of the reference patches. Safety and skin tolerability of both products were comparable; the most frequent treatment-related adverse event was application-site pruritus for both treatments at comparable extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROT-TDS - with shown BE to the originator reference product - displayed similar safety and local tolerability as the reference product in patients with PD. The results show a trend to improved skin adhesion of the new patch compared to the reference in the target population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin adhesion of a newly developed, bioequivalent rotigotine patch formulation in comparison to the originator product: Results of a multi-center, randomized, crossover trial in patients with Parkinson's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang H Jost, Maggie Wang, Gabriel Wauer, Annika Dax, Ralph-Steven Wedemeyer, Barbara Schug, André Warnke, Ana Leblanc, Bjoern Schurad\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CP204672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To demonstrate adequate skin adhesion of a new once-daily rotigotine transdermal patch (ROT-TDS) compared to the originator product (reference) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence (PK BE) was assessed with the 4 mg/24h patches in healthy adults in a single-/multiple-dose, crossover trial. The trial investigating skin adhesion in PD patients (stable dose ≥ 8 mg/day rotigotine) was performed with the 8 mg/24h patches as a multiple-dose, crossover trial (4 alternating once-daily patch applications). Skin status (seborrhea, sweating) was characterized at screening. Adhesion was assessed 5 minutes after application and 5 minutes before removal of each patch. Systemic safety and skin irritation/sensitization were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ROT-TDS was bioequivalent to the reference product in the PK BE trial in 48 randomized healthy subjects. In the skin adhesion trial in 43 randomized PD patients, the cumulative mean percentage of adhesion (90% CI) at the end-of-dosing interval was 92.948% (90.156 - 95.740%) for ROT-TDS and 90.471% (87.574 - 93.367%) for the reference. For ROT-TDS, 80.23% of patches were ≥ 90% adhered at the end-of-dosing interval, while this was the case for 67.44% of the reference patches. Safety and skin tolerability of both products were comparable; the most frequent treatment-related adverse event was application-site pruritus for both treatments at comparable extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROT-TDS - with shown BE to the originator reference product - displayed similar safety and local tolerability as the reference product in patients with PD. The results show a trend to improved skin adhesion of the new patch compared to the reference in the target population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204672\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的证明在帕金森病(PD)患者中,与原研产品(参考品)相比,每日一次的新型罗替戈汀透皮贴剂(ROT-TDS)具有足够的皮肤粘附性:在一项单剂量/多剂量交叉试验中,对健康成人使用 4 毫克/24 小时贴片的药代动力学生物等效性(PK BE)进行了评估。对帕金森氏症患者(稳定剂量≥ 8 毫克/天的罗替戈汀)皮肤粘附性的调查试验采用 8 毫克/24 小时贴片的多剂量交叉试验(4 次交替使用,每天一次)。筛选时对皮肤状态(皮脂溢出、出汗)进行鉴定。在贴敷后 5 分钟和取下贴片前 5 分钟对粘附性进行评估。对全身安全性和皮肤刺激性/致敏性进行了监测:结果:在对 48 名随机健康受试者进行的 PK BE 试验中,ROT-TDS 与参比产品具有生物等效性。在43名随机PD患者的皮肤粘附试验中,ROT-TDS在给药间隔结束时的累计平均粘附百分比(90% CI)为92.948%(90.156 - 95.740%),而参比产品为90.471%(87.574 - 93.367%)。ROT-TDS有80.23%的药贴在用药间隔结束时粘附率≥90%,而参照药贴有67.44%的粘附率≥90%。两种产品的安全性和皮肤耐受性相当;最常见的治疗相关不良事件是涂抹部位瘙痒,两种疗法的程度相当:结论:ROT-TDS与原研参比产品的BE相似,在帕金森病患者中显示出与参比产品相似的安全性和局部耐受性。结果表明,在目标人群中,与参比产品相比,新贴片的皮肤粘附性有改善的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Skin adhesion of a newly developed, bioequivalent rotigotine patch formulation in comparison to the originator product: Results of a multi-center, randomized, crossover trial in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Objectives: To demonstrate adequate skin adhesion of a new once-daily rotigotine transdermal patch (ROT-TDS) compared to the originator product (reference) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

Materials and methods: Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence (PK BE) was assessed with the 4 mg/24h patches in healthy adults in a single-/multiple-dose, crossover trial. The trial investigating skin adhesion in PD patients (stable dose ≥ 8 mg/day rotigotine) was performed with the 8 mg/24h patches as a multiple-dose, crossover trial (4 alternating once-daily patch applications). Skin status (seborrhea, sweating) was characterized at screening. Adhesion was assessed 5 minutes after application and 5 minutes before removal of each patch. Systemic safety and skin irritation/sensitization were monitored.

Results: ROT-TDS was bioequivalent to the reference product in the PK BE trial in 48 randomized healthy subjects. In the skin adhesion trial in 43 randomized PD patients, the cumulative mean percentage of adhesion (90% CI) at the end-of-dosing interval was 92.948% (90.156 - 95.740%) for ROT-TDS and 90.471% (87.574 - 93.367%) for the reference. For ROT-TDS, 80.23% of patches were ≥ 90% adhered at the end-of-dosing interval, while this was the case for 67.44% of the reference patches. Safety and skin tolerability of both products were comparable; the most frequent treatment-related adverse event was application-site pruritus for both treatments at comparable extent.

Conclusion: ROT-TDS - with shown BE to the originator reference product - displayed similar safety and local tolerability as the reference product in patients with PD. The results show a trend to improved skin adhesion of the new patch compared to the reference in the target population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Identification of factors associated with vancomycin-induced acute kidney injury: A retrospective analysis using the Common Data Model. Retrospective evaluation of medical information for predicting tazobactam/piperacillin-induced liver injury. A disproportionality analysis of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia based on FDA adverse event reporting system. Positive effects of magnesium supplementation in metabolic syndrome. Corrigendum for the article Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 11: 525-533.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1