Eishan Beotra, Vincent J J Ngian, Fiona Tran, Kelvin Hsu, Fintan O'Rourke, Bin S Ong
{"title":"最年长者肺栓塞的管理和结果。","authors":"Eishan Beotra, Vincent J J Ngian, Fiona Tran, Kelvin Hsu, Fintan O'Rourke, Bin S Ong","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S475403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment for pulmonary embolism has expanded to include Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs). The incidence of pulmonary-embolism (PE) in \"oldest-old\" age group (≥85 years) is rapidly increasing, but there is limited research on its management and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the differences in management and outcomes in those aged ≥85 years compared to other age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort-study of 373 consecutive patients with pulmonary embolism confirmed on imaging by Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) or Ventilation Perfusion (VQ) Scan at a principal referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Data collected include clinical and demographic data, Charlson comorbidity index, treatment type and outcomes including complications, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the age groups, DOACS were prescribed to 53.4% (n=199) of patients. In oldest-old patients with PE, LMWH bridging to warfarin was the most frequently prescribed treatment, used in 46.2% (n=18, 95% CI: 30.8%-61.5%, p=0.003) of these patients. The mortality rate for patients on LMWH was 13.9% (n=5, 95% CI: 4.2%-37.5%, p=0.553). Overall, major bleeding incidents were rare, occurring in just 1.7% (n=4, 95% CI: 0.4%-3.3%) of patients, with no significant differences in outcomes across age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOACs are increasingly used as the treatment modality of choice in atrial fibrillation but are less well studied in pulmonary embolism, particularly in oldest-old patients. We found that the safety and efficacy profile of DOACs in pulmonary embolism treatment is similar across the age groups. Our study does not support any change in treatment protocols of PE in the oldest old, but further studies are required to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management and Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism in the Oldest-Old.\",\"authors\":\"Eishan Beotra, Vincent J J Ngian, Fiona Tran, Kelvin Hsu, Fintan O'Rourke, Bin S Ong\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S475403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment for pulmonary embolism has expanded to include Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs). The incidence of pulmonary-embolism (PE) in \\\"oldest-old\\\" age group (≥85 years) is rapidly increasing, but there is limited research on its management and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the differences in management and outcomes in those aged ≥85 years compared to other age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort-study of 373 consecutive patients with pulmonary embolism confirmed on imaging by Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) or Ventilation Perfusion (VQ) Scan at a principal referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Data collected include clinical and demographic data, Charlson comorbidity index, treatment type and outcomes including complications, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the age groups, DOACS were prescribed to 53.4% (n=199) of patients. In oldest-old patients with PE, LMWH bridging to warfarin was the most frequently prescribed treatment, used in 46.2% (n=18, 95% CI: 30.8%-61.5%, p=0.003) of these patients. The mortality rate for patients on LMWH was 13.9% (n=5, 95% CI: 4.2%-37.5%, p=0.553). Overall, major bleeding incidents were rare, occurring in just 1.7% (n=4, 95% CI: 0.4%-3.3%) of patients, with no significant differences in outcomes across age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOACs are increasingly used as the treatment modality of choice in atrial fibrillation but are less well studied in pulmonary embolism, particularly in oldest-old patients. We found that the safety and efficacy profile of DOACs in pulmonary embolism treatment is similar across the age groups. Our study does not support any change in treatment protocols of PE in the oldest old, but further studies are required to confirm our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456274/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S475403\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S475403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management and Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism in the Oldest-Old.
Background: Treatment for pulmonary embolism has expanded to include Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs). The incidence of pulmonary-embolism (PE) in "oldest-old" age group (≥85 years) is rapidly increasing, but there is limited research on its management and clinical outcomes.
Aim: To examine the differences in management and outcomes in those aged ≥85 years compared to other age groups.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort-study of 373 consecutive patients with pulmonary embolism confirmed on imaging by Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) or Ventilation Perfusion (VQ) Scan at a principal referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Data collected include clinical and demographic data, Charlson comorbidity index, treatment type and outcomes including complications, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and mortality.
Results: Across the age groups, DOACS were prescribed to 53.4% (n=199) of patients. In oldest-old patients with PE, LMWH bridging to warfarin was the most frequently prescribed treatment, used in 46.2% (n=18, 95% CI: 30.8%-61.5%, p=0.003) of these patients. The mortality rate for patients on LMWH was 13.9% (n=5, 95% CI: 4.2%-37.5%, p=0.553). Overall, major bleeding incidents were rare, occurring in just 1.7% (n=4, 95% CI: 0.4%-3.3%) of patients, with no significant differences in outcomes across age groups.
Conclusion: DOACs are increasingly used as the treatment modality of choice in atrial fibrillation but are less well studied in pulmonary embolism, particularly in oldest-old patients. We found that the safety and efficacy profile of DOACs in pulmonary embolism treatment is similar across the age groups. Our study does not support any change in treatment protocols of PE in the oldest old, but further studies are required to confirm our findings.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.