COVID-19患者口服/静脉注射皮质类固醇的疗效:系统回顾

Q2 Medicine Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JEP.S484596
Irma Rahayu Latarissa, Farida Rendrayani, Ghina Nadhifah Iftinan, Cecep Suhandi, Anna Meiliana, Ida Paulina Sormin, Melisa Intan Barliana, Keri Lestari
{"title":"COVID-19患者口服/静脉注射皮质类固醇的疗效:系统回顾","authors":"Irma Rahayu Latarissa, Farida Rendrayani, Ghina Nadhifah Iftinan, Cecep Suhandi, Anna Meiliana, Ida Paulina Sormin, Melisa Intan Barliana, Keri Lestari","doi":"10.2147/JEP.S484596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic is prompting extensive investigation into potential treatments, including the use of corticosteroids to manage inflammation and mitigate severe disease outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral/intravenous corticosteroids in the management of COVID-19. A comprehensive search was conducted across major scientific databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane for relevant studies published from 2019-2024. The inclusion criteria included studies investigating the use of oral/intravenous corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients >18 years with a randomized placebo-controlled trial method. Non-placebo-controlled studies, studies using combined treatments with other drugs, as well as protocol articles, conference proceedings, review articles, and non-English studies were excluded. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted given the significant methodological diversity. The results showed that a total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria covering the use of three drugs, including dexamethasone (three), hydrocortisone (two), and methylprednisolone (seven). The outcome parameters used for each study were different. Among the total 12 studies, five showed insignificant results for hydrocortisone (two) and methylprednisolone (three), while others reported significant results. This systematic review suggested that oral/intravenous corticosteroids might confer clinical benefits in the management of COVID-19, particularly in reducing mortality and severe disease outcomes. However, further investigation was needed to establish standardized protocols regarding dosage, duration, and safety considerations to optimize efficacy and minimize potential adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"321-337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11453156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Oral/Intravenous Corticosteroid Use in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Irma Rahayu Latarissa, Farida Rendrayani, Ghina Nadhifah Iftinan, Cecep Suhandi, Anna Meiliana, Ida Paulina Sormin, Melisa Intan Barliana, Keri Lestari\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JEP.S484596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic is prompting extensive investigation into potential treatments, including the use of corticosteroids to manage inflammation and mitigate severe disease outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral/intravenous corticosteroids in the management of COVID-19. A comprehensive search was conducted across major scientific databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane for relevant studies published from 2019-2024. The inclusion criteria included studies investigating the use of oral/intravenous corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients >18 years with a randomized placebo-controlled trial method. Non-placebo-controlled studies, studies using combined treatments with other drugs, as well as protocol articles, conference proceedings, review articles, and non-English studies were excluded. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted given the significant methodological diversity. The results showed that a total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria covering the use of three drugs, including dexamethasone (three), hydrocortisone (two), and methylprednisolone (seven). The outcome parameters used for each study were different. Among the total 12 studies, five showed insignificant results for hydrocortisone (two) and methylprednisolone (three), while others reported significant results. This systematic review suggested that oral/intravenous corticosteroids might confer clinical benefits in the management of COVID-19, particularly in reducing mortality and severe disease outcomes. However, further investigation was needed to establish standardized protocols regarding dosage, duration, and safety considerations to optimize efficacy and minimize potential adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"321-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11453156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JEP.S484596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JEP.S484596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 的流行促使人们广泛研究潜在的治疗方法,包括使用皮质类固醇来控制炎症和减轻严重的疾病后果。因此,本系统综述旨在评估口服/静脉注射皮质类固醇在治疗 COVID-19 方面的疗效。我们在 MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Cochrane 等主要科学数据库中对 2019-2024 年间发表的相关研究进行了全面检索。纳入标准包括采用随机安慰剂对照试验方法调查 COVID-19 患者口服/静脉注射皮质类固醇使用情况的研究。非安慰剂对照研究、与其他药物联合治疗的研究以及协议文章、会议论文集、综述文章和非英语研究均被排除在外。鉴于研究方法的多样性,研究采用了叙事综合法。结果显示,共有 12 项研究符合纳入标准,涉及三种药物的使用,包括地塞米松(3 项)、氢化可的松(2 项)和甲基强的松龙(7 项)。每项研究使用的结果参数各不相同。在总共 12 项研究中,有 5 项研究显示氢化可的松(2 项)和甲基强的松龙(3 项)的结果不显著,而其他研究则报告了显著的结果。这项系统性综述表明,口服/静脉注射皮质类固醇可能对治疗 COVID-19 有临床益处,尤其是在降低死亡率和严重疾病后果方面。不过,还需要进一步调查,以制定有关剂量、持续时间和安全性考虑因素的标准化方案,从而优化疗效并尽量减少潜在的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Efficacy of Oral/Intravenous Corticosteroid Use in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review.

The COVID-19 pandemic is prompting extensive investigation into potential treatments, including the use of corticosteroids to manage inflammation and mitigate severe disease outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral/intravenous corticosteroids in the management of COVID-19. A comprehensive search was conducted across major scientific databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane for relevant studies published from 2019-2024. The inclusion criteria included studies investigating the use of oral/intravenous corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients >18 years with a randomized placebo-controlled trial method. Non-placebo-controlled studies, studies using combined treatments with other drugs, as well as protocol articles, conference proceedings, review articles, and non-English studies were excluded. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted given the significant methodological diversity. The results showed that a total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria covering the use of three drugs, including dexamethasone (three), hydrocortisone (two), and methylprednisolone (seven). The outcome parameters used for each study were different. Among the total 12 studies, five showed insignificant results for hydrocortisone (two) and methylprednisolone (three), while others reported significant results. This systematic review suggested that oral/intravenous corticosteroids might confer clinical benefits in the management of COVID-19, particularly in reducing mortality and severe disease outcomes. However, further investigation was needed to establish standardized protocols regarding dosage, duration, and safety considerations to optimize efficacy and minimize potential adverse effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Some Plants of Genus Alpinia: Insights from In Vitro, In Vivo, and Human Studies. Two Novel Compounds Isolated from the Marine Fungal Symbiont of Aspergillus unguis Induce Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in Breast Cancer Cells: In vitro Study. Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) Ethanolic Extract Inhibits Pparg Expression While Maintaining the Methylation of the Pparg Promoter During 3T3-L1 Adipocyte Differentiation. The Suppression of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-3 in A549 human Lung Carcinoma Cells Induced by Marine Sponge Callyspongia aerizusa. Efficacy of Probiotic Supplements and Topical Applications in the Treatment of Acne: A Scoping Review of Current Results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1