偏心踏步运动时心血管和新陈代谢反应减弱:试点研究

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiological Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.14814/phy2.70080
Nicholas C Renwick, Stuart Egginton, Carrie Ferguson
{"title":"偏心踏步运动时心血管和新陈代谢反应减弱:试点研究","authors":"Nicholas C Renwick, Stuart Egginton, Carrie Ferguson","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared cardiovascular and metabolic responses during concentric and eccentric stepping. Eight participants (5 m, 3f; 22 ± 2 years) performed maximal concentric and eccentric ramp incremental tests on a modified stepping ergometer. Subsequently, three randomized 15-min constant-power tests were performed (1) concentric stepping at 90% of the concentric lactate threshold (LT), (2) eccentric stepping at the same power, and (3) eccentric stepping at the same oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>). At equivalent power (36 ± 6 W, p = 0.62), eccentric stepping resulted in 46 ± 8% lower V̇O<sub>2</sub>, 16 ± 6% lower heart rate (HR), and 11 ± 5% lower mean arterial blood pressure compared to concentric (p < 0.01). Matching V̇O<sub>2</sub> required 65 ± 19% more power during eccentric stepping (p < 0.01). During this test, eccentric V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR continued to increase, resulting in a 22 ± 29% higher V̇O<sub>2</sub> and 19 ± 16% higher HR in the final minute (p < 0.001). Reduced cardiorespiratory demand during eccentric stepping at the same power as concentric demonstrates a higher eccentric power is required to produce the same V̇O<sub>2</sub>. However, despite being below the concentric LT, eccentric V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR continued to increase past the predicted steady state, indicating a higher exercise intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 19","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced cardiovascular and metabolic responses during eccentric stepping exercise: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas C Renwick, Stuart Egginton, Carrie Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compared cardiovascular and metabolic responses during concentric and eccentric stepping. Eight participants (5 m, 3f; 22 ± 2 years) performed maximal concentric and eccentric ramp incremental tests on a modified stepping ergometer. Subsequently, three randomized 15-min constant-power tests were performed (1) concentric stepping at 90% of the concentric lactate threshold (LT), (2) eccentric stepping at the same power, and (3) eccentric stepping at the same oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>). At equivalent power (36 ± 6 W, p = 0.62), eccentric stepping resulted in 46 ± 8% lower V̇O<sub>2</sub>, 16 ± 6% lower heart rate (HR), and 11 ± 5% lower mean arterial blood pressure compared to concentric (p < 0.01). Matching V̇O<sub>2</sub> required 65 ± 19% more power during eccentric stepping (p < 0.01). During this test, eccentric V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR continued to increase, resulting in a 22 ± 29% higher V̇O<sub>2</sub> and 19 ± 16% higher HR in the final minute (p < 0.001). Reduced cardiorespiratory demand during eccentric stepping at the same power as concentric demonstrates a higher eccentric power is required to produce the same V̇O<sub>2</sub>. However, despite being below the concentric LT, eccentric V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR continued to increase past the predicted steady state, indicating a higher exercise intensity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"12 19\",\"pages\":\"e70080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了同心和偏心踏步时的心血管和新陈代谢反应。八名参与者(5 米,3 英尺;22 ± 2 岁)在改良的踏步测力计上进行了最大同心和偏心斜坡增量测试。随后,他们进行了三次随机的 15 分钟恒定功率测试(1)以 90% 的同心乳酸阈值(LT)进行同心踏步;(2)以相同功率进行偏心踏步;(3)以相同摄氧量(V̇O2)进行偏心踏步。在同等功率(36±6 W,p = 0.62)下,与同心相比,偏心步法导致 V̇O2 降低 46±8%,心率降低 16±6%,平均动脉血压降低 11±5%(p 2),偏心步法所需功率增加 65±19%(p 2),心率继续增加,导致最后一分钟 V̇O2 增加 22±29%,心率增加 19±16%(p 2)。然而,尽管低于同心LT,偏心V鄄O2和心率继续增加,超过了预测的稳定状态,表明运动强度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reduced cardiovascular and metabolic responses during eccentric stepping exercise: A pilot study.

This study compared cardiovascular and metabolic responses during concentric and eccentric stepping. Eight participants (5 m, 3f; 22 ± 2 years) performed maximal concentric and eccentric ramp incremental tests on a modified stepping ergometer. Subsequently, three randomized 15-min constant-power tests were performed (1) concentric stepping at 90% of the concentric lactate threshold (LT), (2) eccentric stepping at the same power, and (3) eccentric stepping at the same oxygen uptake (V̇O2). At equivalent power (36 ± 6 W, p = 0.62), eccentric stepping resulted in 46 ± 8% lower V̇O2, 16 ± 6% lower heart rate (HR), and 11 ± 5% lower mean arterial blood pressure compared to concentric (p < 0.01). Matching V̇O2 required 65 ± 19% more power during eccentric stepping (p < 0.01). During this test, eccentric V̇O2 and HR continued to increase, resulting in a 22 ± 29% higher V̇O2 and 19 ± 16% higher HR in the final minute (p < 0.001). Reduced cardiorespiratory demand during eccentric stepping at the same power as concentric demonstrates a higher eccentric power is required to produce the same V̇O2. However, despite being below the concentric LT, eccentric V̇O2 and HR continued to increase past the predicted steady state, indicating a higher exercise intensity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of occupational exposure: A study on cardiovascular autonomic functions of male gas station attendants in Sri Lanka. Physiologists as medical scientists: An early warning from the German academic system. Examining the effect of salbutamol use in ozone air pollution by people with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Reverse epidemiology of obesity paradox: Fact or fiction? Spinal pain prevalence and associated determinants: A population-based study using the National Survey for Wales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1