Nicholas C Renwick, Stuart Egginton, Carrie Ferguson
{"title":"偏心踏步运动时心血管和新陈代谢反应减弱:试点研究","authors":"Nicholas C Renwick, Stuart Egginton, Carrie Ferguson","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared cardiovascular and metabolic responses during concentric and eccentric stepping. Eight participants (5 m, 3f; 22 ± 2 years) performed maximal concentric and eccentric ramp incremental tests on a modified stepping ergometer. Subsequently, three randomized 15-min constant-power tests were performed (1) concentric stepping at 90% of the concentric lactate threshold (LT), (2) eccentric stepping at the same power, and (3) eccentric stepping at the same oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>). At equivalent power (36 ± 6 W, p = 0.62), eccentric stepping resulted in 46 ± 8% lower V̇O<sub>2</sub>, 16 ± 6% lower heart rate (HR), and 11 ± 5% lower mean arterial blood pressure compared to concentric (p < 0.01). Matching V̇O<sub>2</sub> required 65 ± 19% more power during eccentric stepping (p < 0.01). During this test, eccentric V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR continued to increase, resulting in a 22 ± 29% higher V̇O<sub>2</sub> and 19 ± 16% higher HR in the final minute (p < 0.001). Reduced cardiorespiratory demand during eccentric stepping at the same power as concentric demonstrates a higher eccentric power is required to produce the same V̇O<sub>2</sub>. However, despite being below the concentric LT, eccentric V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR continued to increase past the predicted steady state, indicating a higher exercise intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 19","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced cardiovascular and metabolic responses during eccentric stepping exercise: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas C Renwick, Stuart Egginton, Carrie Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compared cardiovascular and metabolic responses during concentric and eccentric stepping. Eight participants (5 m, 3f; 22 ± 2 years) performed maximal concentric and eccentric ramp incremental tests on a modified stepping ergometer. Subsequently, three randomized 15-min constant-power tests were performed (1) concentric stepping at 90% of the concentric lactate threshold (LT), (2) eccentric stepping at the same power, and (3) eccentric stepping at the same oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>). At equivalent power (36 ± 6 W, p = 0.62), eccentric stepping resulted in 46 ± 8% lower V̇O<sub>2</sub>, 16 ± 6% lower heart rate (HR), and 11 ± 5% lower mean arterial blood pressure compared to concentric (p < 0.01). Matching V̇O<sub>2</sub> required 65 ± 19% more power during eccentric stepping (p < 0.01). During this test, eccentric V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR continued to increase, resulting in a 22 ± 29% higher V̇O<sub>2</sub> and 19 ± 16% higher HR in the final minute (p < 0.001). Reduced cardiorespiratory demand during eccentric stepping at the same power as concentric demonstrates a higher eccentric power is required to produce the same V̇O<sub>2</sub>. However, despite being below the concentric LT, eccentric V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR continued to increase past the predicted steady state, indicating a higher exercise intensity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"12 19\",\"pages\":\"e70080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reduced cardiovascular and metabolic responses during eccentric stepping exercise: A pilot study.
This study compared cardiovascular and metabolic responses during concentric and eccentric stepping. Eight participants (5 m, 3f; 22 ± 2 years) performed maximal concentric and eccentric ramp incremental tests on a modified stepping ergometer. Subsequently, three randomized 15-min constant-power tests were performed (1) concentric stepping at 90% of the concentric lactate threshold (LT), (2) eccentric stepping at the same power, and (3) eccentric stepping at the same oxygen uptake (V̇O2). At equivalent power (36 ± 6 W, p = 0.62), eccentric stepping resulted in 46 ± 8% lower V̇O2, 16 ± 6% lower heart rate (HR), and 11 ± 5% lower mean arterial blood pressure compared to concentric (p < 0.01). Matching V̇O2 required 65 ± 19% more power during eccentric stepping (p < 0.01). During this test, eccentric V̇O2 and HR continued to increase, resulting in a 22 ± 29% higher V̇O2 and 19 ± 16% higher HR in the final minute (p < 0.001). Reduced cardiorespiratory demand during eccentric stepping at the same power as concentric demonstrates a higher eccentric power is required to produce the same V̇O2. However, despite being below the concentric LT, eccentric V̇O2 and HR continued to increase past the predicted steady state, indicating a higher exercise intensity.
期刊介绍:
Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.