通过两种手术方法进行 Penuma 硅胶植入手术后的疗效和患者满意度。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562872241280021
Morgan Salkowski, Laurence A Levine
{"title":"通过两种手术方法进行 Penuma 硅胶植入手术后的疗效和患者满意度。","authors":"Morgan Salkowski, Laurence A Levine","doi":"10.1177/17562872241280021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Penuma is a soft silicone penile implant designed for cosmetic enhancement of the flaccid penis in men who have normal erections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this study is to report outcomes on patient satisfaction at least 6 months after Penuma subcutaneous penile implant for cosmetic enhancement of the penis, and to determine if modifications in surgical approach resulted in reduction in postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Penile measurements, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were compared between patients undergoing the new lateral scrotal incision versus the traditional infrapubic approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent a Penuma implant by a single surgeon from April 2019 to December 2022. A 26-item non-validated device-specific questionnaire was sent to patients at least 6 months after the date of their initial surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 cases were performed by a single surgeon. The average increase in flaccid length was 2.5 cm (±2.2), representing a 44% increase (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The average increase in girth was 3.1 cm (±1.8 cm), a 32% change (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Seroma requiring drainage occurred in 12%. 7% of patients required operative revision of the implant. When assessed by surgical approach, the revision rate was significantly higher in infrapubic patients (13% vs 2%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The implant removal rate was also significantly higher when the infrapubic approach was used (21% vs 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). 82% of patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their postoperative penile appearance. 75% of patients would undergo surgery again.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The subcutaneous Penuma penile implant appears to improve satisfaction with regard to the appearance of the penis and is a viable option for men who desire to enhance flaccid penile length and girth. Furthermore, the lateral scrotal surgical approach appears to have a lower postoperative complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes and patient satisfaction after Penuma silicone implant surgery via two surgical approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Morgan Salkowski, Laurence A Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562872241280021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Penuma is a soft silicone penile implant designed for cosmetic enhancement of the flaccid penis in men who have normal erections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this study is to report outcomes on patient satisfaction at least 6 months after Penuma subcutaneous penile implant for cosmetic enhancement of the penis, and to determine if modifications in surgical approach resulted in reduction in postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Penile measurements, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were compared between patients undergoing the new lateral scrotal incision versus the traditional infrapubic approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent a Penuma implant by a single surgeon from April 2019 to December 2022. A 26-item non-validated device-specific questionnaire was sent to patients at least 6 months after the date of their initial surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 cases were performed by a single surgeon. The average increase in flaccid length was 2.5 cm (±2.2), representing a 44% increase (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The average increase in girth was 3.1 cm (±1.8 cm), a 32% change (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Seroma requiring drainage occurred in 12%. 7% of patients required operative revision of the implant. When assessed by surgical approach, the revision rate was significantly higher in infrapubic patients (13% vs 2%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The implant removal rate was also significantly higher when the infrapubic approach was used (21% vs 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). 82% of patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their postoperative penile appearance. 75% of patients would undergo surgery again.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The subcutaneous Penuma penile implant appears to improve satisfaction with regard to the appearance of the penis and is a viable option for men who desire to enhance flaccid penile length and girth. Furthermore, the lateral scrotal surgical approach appears to have a lower postoperative complication rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456194/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872241280021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872241280021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Penuma 是一种柔软的硅胶阴茎植入物,设计用于增强勃起正常的男性松弛阴茎的外观:本研究的目的是报告Penuma阴茎皮下植入物用于阴茎美容增粗至少6个月后患者的满意度,并确定手术方法的改变是否导致术后并发症的减少:设计:比较新的阴囊外侧切口与传统耻骨下切口的阴茎测量结果、不良事件和患者满意度:对2019年4月至2022年12月期间由一名外科医生进行Penuma植入术的所有患者进行了回顾性病历审查。在患者接受首次手术至少 6 个月后,向他们发送了一份包含 26 个项目的未经验证的设备特定问卷:结果:共有 92 个病例由一名外科医生完成。松弛长度平均增加了 2.5 厘米(±2.2),即增加了 44%(p p p p 结论):皮下 Penuma 阴茎假体似乎能提高阴茎外观的满意度,对于希望增加阴茎松弛长度和周长的男性来说是一种可行的选择。此外,阴囊外侧手术方法的术后并发症发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes and patient satisfaction after Penuma silicone implant surgery via two surgical approaches.

Background: The Penuma is a soft silicone penile implant designed for cosmetic enhancement of the flaccid penis in men who have normal erections.

Objectives: The goal of this study is to report outcomes on patient satisfaction at least 6 months after Penuma subcutaneous penile implant for cosmetic enhancement of the penis, and to determine if modifications in surgical approach resulted in reduction in postoperative complications.

Design: Penile measurements, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were compared between patients undergoing the new lateral scrotal incision versus the traditional infrapubic approach.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent a Penuma implant by a single surgeon from April 2019 to December 2022. A 26-item non-validated device-specific questionnaire was sent to patients at least 6 months after the date of their initial surgery.

Results: A total of 92 cases were performed by a single surgeon. The average increase in flaccid length was 2.5 cm (±2.2), representing a 44% increase (p < 0.01). The average increase in girth was 3.1 cm (±1.8 cm), a 32% change (p < 0.01). Seroma requiring drainage occurred in 12%. 7% of patients required operative revision of the implant. When assessed by surgical approach, the revision rate was significantly higher in infrapubic patients (13% vs 2%, p < 0.05). The implant removal rate was also significantly higher when the infrapubic approach was used (21% vs 6%, p < 0.05). 82% of patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their postoperative penile appearance. 75% of patients would undergo surgery again.

Conclusion: The subcutaneous Penuma penile implant appears to improve satisfaction with regard to the appearance of the penis and is a viable option for men who desire to enhance flaccid penile length and girth. Furthermore, the lateral scrotal surgical approach appears to have a lower postoperative complication rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.
期刊最新文献
A machine learning-based nomogram model for predicting the recurrence of cystitis glandularis. Outcomes and patient satisfaction after Penuma silicone implant surgery via two surgical approaches. Characterizing patient experiences with repeat artificial urinary sphincter revisions through quantitative surveys and qualitative patient interviews. Meta-analysis of postoperative urinary incontinence incidence and risk factors in HoLEP. Clinical use of nadofaragene firadenovec-vncg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1