{"title":"临床实践中杜瓦单抗加曲妥木单抗联合治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的初始疗效和安全性。","authors":"Tetsu Tomonari, Joji Tani, Yasushi Sato, Hironori Tanaka, Akihiro Morishita, Koichi Okamoto, Yutaka Kawano, Masahiro Sogabe, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Tetsuji Takayama","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur + Tre) combination therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively evaluated 37 patients with uHCC from our institutions between April 2023 and January 2024. Patients were divided into first- and later-line groups for analysis of antitumor efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and transition rate to second-line treatment according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The disease control rate (DCR) for the first-line group was 80.9%, which was significantly higher than that for the later-line group (50%). The incidence of immune-related AEs (irAEs) was 24.3%, with grade 3 or higher irAEs including increased transaminase (8.1%), diarrhea (8.1%), and adrenal insufficiency (2.7%). The rates of drug withdrawal and discontinuation owing to AEs were 23.8% and 19%, respectively, in the first-line treatment and 31.2% and 12.5%, respectively, in the later-line treatment, with no significant difference. Analysis of changes in liver reserve using the albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score showed no obvious loss of liver reserve for up to 12 weeks. The transition rate from first- to second-line therapy after progressive disease (PD) was as high as 94.7%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The efficacy and safety of Dur + Tre in clinical practice were comparable to those reported in a recent phase III trial. The first-line Dur + Tre therapy had a higher DCR than that of the later lines, and the transition rate to second-line therapy was considerably high, suggesting that Dur + Tre therapy would be more beneficial in first-line treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial treatment efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"Tetsu Tomonari, Joji Tani, Yasushi Sato, Hironori Tanaka, Akihiro Morishita, Koichi Okamoto, Yutaka Kawano, Masahiro Sogabe, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Tetsuji Takayama\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur + Tre) combination therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively evaluated 37 patients with uHCC from our institutions between April 2023 and January 2024. Patients were divided into first- and later-line groups for analysis of antitumor efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and transition rate to second-line treatment according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The disease control rate (DCR) for the first-line group was 80.9%, which was significantly higher than that for the later-line group (50%). The incidence of immune-related AEs (irAEs) was 24.3%, with grade 3 or higher irAEs including increased transaminase (8.1%), diarrhea (8.1%), and adrenal insufficiency (2.7%). The rates of drug withdrawal and discontinuation owing to AEs were 23.8% and 19%, respectively, in the first-line treatment and 31.2% and 12.5%, respectively, in the later-line treatment, with no significant difference. Analysis of changes in liver reserve using the albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score showed no obvious loss of liver reserve for up to 12 weeks. The transition rate from first- to second-line therapy after progressive disease (PD) was as high as 94.7%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The efficacy and safety of Dur + Tre in clinical practice were comparable to those reported in a recent phase III trial. The first-line Dur + Tre therapy had a higher DCR than that of the later lines, and the transition rate to second-line therapy was considerably high, suggesting that Dur + Tre therapy would be more beneficial in first-line treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的我们旨在评估临床实践中杜瓦单抗加曲妥木单抗(Dur + Tre)联合治疗不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)患者的有效性和安全性:我们回顾性评估了2023年4月至2024年1月期间我院的37例uHCC患者。根据实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST),将患者分为一线组和二线组,分析抗肿瘤疗效、不良事件(AEs)和二线治疗转归率:结果:一线治疗组的疾病控制率(DCR)为80.9%,明显高于二线治疗组(50%)。免疫相关不良反应(irAEs)的发生率为24.3%,其中3级或以上的不良反应包括转氨酶升高(8.1%)、腹泻(8.1%)和肾上腺功能不全(2.7%)。一线治疗中因AEs导致的停药率和停药率分别为23.8%和19%,后线治疗中分别为31.2%和12.5%,无显著差异。使用白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分分析肝脏储备的变化显示,在长达12周的时间里,肝脏储备没有明显下降。疾病进展期(PD)后从一线治疗到二线治疗的过渡率高达94.7%:结论:Dur + Tre 在临床实践中的疗效和安全性与最近一项 III 期试验报告的疗效和安全性相当。一线Dur + Tre疗法的DCR高于后几线疗法,而且转为二线疗法的比率相当高,这表明Dur + Tre疗法在一线治疗中更有益。
Initial treatment efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice
Background and Aims
We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur + Tre) combination therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in clinical practice.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 37 patients with uHCC from our institutions between April 2023 and January 2024. Patients were divided into first- and later-line groups for analysis of antitumor efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and transition rate to second-line treatment according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).
Results
The disease control rate (DCR) for the first-line group was 80.9%, which was significantly higher than that for the later-line group (50%). The incidence of immune-related AEs (irAEs) was 24.3%, with grade 3 or higher irAEs including increased transaminase (8.1%), diarrhea (8.1%), and adrenal insufficiency (2.7%). The rates of drug withdrawal and discontinuation owing to AEs were 23.8% and 19%, respectively, in the first-line treatment and 31.2% and 12.5%, respectively, in the later-line treatment, with no significant difference. Analysis of changes in liver reserve using the albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score showed no obvious loss of liver reserve for up to 12 weeks. The transition rate from first- to second-line therapy after progressive disease (PD) was as high as 94.7%.
Conclusion
The efficacy and safety of Dur + Tre in clinical practice were comparable to those reported in a recent phase III trial. The first-line Dur + Tre therapy had a higher DCR than that of the later lines, and the transition rate to second-line therapy was considerably high, suggesting that Dur + Tre therapy would be more beneficial in first-line treatment.