单中心回顾性队列研究:通过多学科方案治疗孤立的原发性三尖瓣感染性心内膜炎。

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361241280690
Bennett Collis, Talal Alnabelsi, Evan Hall, Chloe Cao, Meredith Johnson, John Gurley, Luke Strnad, Hassan Reda, Tessa London, Erinn Ogburn, Michael Sekela, Bobbi Jo Stoner, Sami El-Dalati
{"title":"单中心回顾性队列研究:通过多学科方案治疗孤立的原发性三尖瓣感染性心内膜炎。","authors":"Bennett Collis, Talal Alnabelsi, Evan Hall, Chloe Cao, Meredith Johnson, John Gurley, Luke Strnad, Hassan Reda, Tessa London, Erinn Ogburn, Michael Sekela, Bobbi Jo Stoner, Sami El-Dalati","doi":"10.1177/20499361241280690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis remains a challenging disease to treat given the large number of patients with substance use disorder. There is limited data on the optimal treatment strategy and the impact of a multidisciplinary endocarditis program on outcomes for this population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the clinical outcomes associated with management of native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis by a multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient cases were identified from the registry of the institutional multidisciplinary endocarditis team. Patients with left-sided endocarditis, multivalvular endocarditis, prosthetic tricuspid valves and cardiac implantable electronic devices were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 7th, 2021 and February 1st, 2024 72 consecutive patients with isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis were identified. Sixty-six (91.7%) patients were managed medically. Five patients underwent percutaneous mechanical aspiration of tricuspid valve vegetations and one patient underwent tricuspid valve replacement during the index hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was 1.4% and 90-day mortality was 2.8%. Nineteen (26.4%) patients discharged before medically advised and 25% were re-admitted within 30 days. Ten (13.9%) patients underwent elective tricuspid valve replacements after outpatient follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among 72 patients with isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis managed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis program over a 2.5-year period, in-hospital, 90-day mortality and 1-year mortality were very low despite low rates of percutaneous mechanical aspiration and tricuspid valve surgery. Multidisciplinary follow-up can lead to elective tricuspid valve surgery in a delayed fashion.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20499361241280690"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis by a multidisciplinary program: a single-center retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Bennett Collis, Talal Alnabelsi, Evan Hall, Chloe Cao, Meredith Johnson, John Gurley, Luke Strnad, Hassan Reda, Tessa London, Erinn Ogburn, Michael Sekela, Bobbi Jo Stoner, Sami El-Dalati\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20499361241280690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis remains a challenging disease to treat given the large number of patients with substance use disorder. There is limited data on the optimal treatment strategy and the impact of a multidisciplinary endocarditis program on outcomes for this population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the clinical outcomes associated with management of native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis by a multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient cases were identified from the registry of the institutional multidisciplinary endocarditis team. Patients with left-sided endocarditis, multivalvular endocarditis, prosthetic tricuspid valves and cardiac implantable electronic devices were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 7th, 2021 and February 1st, 2024 72 consecutive patients with isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis were identified. Sixty-six (91.7%) patients were managed medically. Five patients underwent percutaneous mechanical aspiration of tricuspid valve vegetations and one patient underwent tricuspid valve replacement during the index hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was 1.4% and 90-day mortality was 2.8%. Nineteen (26.4%) patients discharged before medically advised and 25% were re-admitted within 30 days. Ten (13.9%) patients underwent elective tricuspid valve replacements after outpatient follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among 72 patients with isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis managed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis program over a 2.5-year period, in-hospital, 90-day mortality and 1-year mortality were very low despite low rates of percutaneous mechanical aspiration and tricuspid valve surgery. Multidisciplinary follow-up can lead to elective tricuspid valve surgery in a delayed fashion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20499361241280690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241280690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241280690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于大量患者患有药物使用障碍,孤立的原发性三尖瓣感染性心内膜炎仍然是一种具有挑战性的疾病。关于最佳治疗策略以及多学科心内膜炎治疗方案对这一人群治疗效果的影响的数据十分有限:评估多学科团队治疗原发性三尖瓣感染性心内膜炎的临床疗效:设计:单中心、回顾性队列研究:患者病例从机构多学科心内膜炎团队的登记簿中确定。不包括左侧心内膜炎、多瓣心内膜炎、人工三尖瓣和心脏植入电子设备的患者:结果:2021 年 9 月 7 日至 2024 年 2 月 1 日期间,共发现 72 名连续的孤立原发性三尖瓣感染性心内膜炎患者。66名患者(91.7%)接受了药物治疗。五名患者在住院期间接受了经皮机械抽吸三尖瓣植被,一名患者接受了三尖瓣置换术。院内死亡率为 1.4%,90 天死亡率为 2.8%。19名患者(26.4%)在医生建议前出院,25%的患者在30天内再次入院。10名(13.9%)患者在门诊随访后接受了择期三尖瓣置换术:结论:在多学科心内膜炎项目管理的72名孤立原发性三尖瓣感染性心内膜炎患者中,尽管经皮机械抽吸术和三尖瓣手术的比例较低,但住院率、90天死亡率和1年死亡率都非常低。多学科随访可延迟三尖瓣手术的择期手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis by a multidisciplinary program: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Background: Isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis remains a challenging disease to treat given the large number of patients with substance use disorder. There is limited data on the optimal treatment strategy and the impact of a multidisciplinary endocarditis program on outcomes for this population.

Objectives: To assess the clinical outcomes associated with management of native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis by a multidisciplinary team.

Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Patient cases were identified from the registry of the institutional multidisciplinary endocarditis team. Patients with left-sided endocarditis, multivalvular endocarditis, prosthetic tricuspid valves and cardiac implantable electronic devices were excluded.

Results: Between September 7th, 2021 and February 1st, 2024 72 consecutive patients with isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis were identified. Sixty-six (91.7%) patients were managed medically. Five patients underwent percutaneous mechanical aspiration of tricuspid valve vegetations and one patient underwent tricuspid valve replacement during the index hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was 1.4% and 90-day mortality was 2.8%. Nineteen (26.4%) patients discharged before medically advised and 25% were re-admitted within 30 days. Ten (13.9%) patients underwent elective tricuspid valve replacements after outpatient follow-up.

Conclusion: Among 72 patients with isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis managed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis program over a 2.5-year period, in-hospital, 90-day mortality and 1-year mortality were very low despite low rates of percutaneous mechanical aspiration and tricuspid valve surgery. Multidisciplinary follow-up can lead to elective tricuspid valve surgery in a delayed fashion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social disparities on PrEP use and awareness among sexual and gender minorities using smartphones in India. Challenges in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. braziliensis in four travelers: a case series. Fungal Infections, Treatment and Antifungal Resistance: The Sub-Saharan African Context. Polio: Background and perspective on how international travel can be made safe against polio. Emerging trends in fungal endocarditis: clinical complexity, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic implications - a case series and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1