骨质疏松症与颈椎前路椎间盘切除和融合术后四年随访期间的再次手术或假关节炎无关:美国学术健康中心的回顾性队列研究。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.031
Anthony N Baumann, Robert J Trager, Davin C Gong, Omkar S Anaspure, John T Strony, Ilyas Aleem
{"title":"骨质疏松症与颈椎前路椎间盘切除和融合术后四年随访期间的再次手术或假关节炎无关:美国学术健康中心的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Anthony N Baumann, Robert J Trager, Davin C Gong, Omkar S Anaspure, John T Strony, Ilyas Aleem","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Osteoporosis has been proposed as a risk factor for reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet this potential association has been understudied, with conflicting results to date.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the hypothesis that adults with osteoporosis would have an increased risk of reoperation after ACDF compared to matched adults without osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Two matched cohorts (mean age: 62 years; 75% female), each with 1,019 patients, who underwent primary ACDF. Cohorts were determined by the presence or absence of a diagnosis of osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Incidence of reoperation occurring over 4 years postoperatively, with our primary outcome being the risk ratio (RR) of reoperation with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included risk and mean count of oral opioid prescriptions and risk of pseudoarthrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the TriNetX network to identify adults undergoing their first ACDF from 2004 to 2020, excluding those with serious pathology, and divided patients into 2 cohorts: osteoporosis and nonosteoporosis. Patients were propensity matched according to key risk factors for reoperation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with osteoporosis had no statistically significant or meaningful difference in risk of reoperation compared to nonosteoporotic patients over 4-years' follow-up [95% CI] (17.3% vs. 16.5%; RR: 1.05 [0.86, 1.27]; p=.6361). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the risk of pseudoarthrosis (26.5% vs. 29.1%; RR: 0.91 [0.79, 1.05]; p=.1820), oral opioid prescription (75.0% vs. 76.0%; RR: 0.99 [0.94, 1.04]; p=.6067), or mean oral opioid prescription count (11.5 vs. 11.8; p=.7040).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to matched nonosteoporosis controls, osteoporosis was not associated with a statistically significant or clinically meaningful increase in risk of reoperation in adults over 4 years after ACDF. Furthermore, osteoporosis was not associated with a significant or meaningful risk of pseudoarthrosis or oral opioid prescription after ACDF, although more research is needed for corroboration. Additional research is needed to clarify whether those with osteoporosis have meaningful differences in pain and function compared to those without osteoporosis following ACDF.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoporosis is not associated with reoperation or pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion through 4-years' follow-up: a retrospective cohort study of US academic health centers.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony N Baumann, Robert J Trager, Davin C Gong, Omkar S Anaspure, John T Strony, Ilyas Aleem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Osteoporosis has been proposed as a risk factor for reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet this potential association has been understudied, with conflicting results to date.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the hypothesis that adults with osteoporosis would have an increased risk of reoperation after ACDF compared to matched adults without osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Two matched cohorts (mean age: 62 years; 75% female), each with 1,019 patients, who underwent primary ACDF. Cohorts were determined by the presence or absence of a diagnosis of osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Incidence of reoperation occurring over 4 years postoperatively, with our primary outcome being the risk ratio (RR) of reoperation with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included risk and mean count of oral opioid prescriptions and risk of pseudoarthrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the TriNetX network to identify adults undergoing their first ACDF from 2004 to 2020, excluding those with serious pathology, and divided patients into 2 cohorts: osteoporosis and nonosteoporosis. Patients were propensity matched according to key risk factors for reoperation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with osteoporosis had no statistically significant or meaningful difference in risk of reoperation compared to nonosteoporotic patients over 4-years' follow-up [95% CI] (17.3% vs. 16.5%; RR: 1.05 [0.86, 1.27]; p=.6361). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the risk of pseudoarthrosis (26.5% vs. 29.1%; RR: 0.91 [0.79, 1.05]; p=.1820), oral opioid prescription (75.0% vs. 76.0%; RR: 0.99 [0.94, 1.04]; p=.6067), or mean oral opioid prescription count (11.5 vs. 11.8; p=.7040).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to matched nonosteoporosis controls, osteoporosis was not associated with a statistically significant or clinically meaningful increase in risk of reoperation in adults over 4 years after ACDF. Furthermore, osteoporosis was not associated with a significant or meaningful risk of pseudoarthrosis or oral opioid prescription after ACDF, although more research is needed for corroboration. Additional research is needed to clarify whether those with osteoporosis have meaningful differences in pain and function compared to those without osteoporosis following ACDF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景情况:目的:本研究探讨了一个假设,即与没有骨质疏松症的成年人相比,患有骨质疏松症的成年人在颈椎前路椎间盘切除和融合术(ACDF)后再次手术的风险会增加:患者样本:两个匹配队列(平均年龄:62 岁;75% 为女性),每个队列中有 1,019 名患者接受了初级 ACDF。根据是否诊断出骨质疏松症确定队列:术后四年内再次手术的发生率,我们的主要结果是再次手术的风险比 (RR),以及 95% 的置信区间 (CI)。次要结果包括口服阿片类药物处方的风险和平均次数以及假关节的风险:我们利用 TriNetX 网络识别了 2004-2020 年间首次接受 ACDF 手术的成年人,排除了有严重病变的患者,并将患者分为两个队列:骨质疏松症和非骨质疏松症。根据再次手术的主要风险因素对患者进行倾向匹配:在四年的随访中,骨质疏松症患者与非骨质疏松症患者相比,再次手术的风险没有显著或有意义的统计学差异[95% CI](17.3% 对 16.5%;RR:1.05 [0.86, 1.27];P=0.6361)。同样,假关节风险(26.5% 对 29.1%;RR:0.91 [0.79, 1.05];P=0.1820)、口服阿片类药物处方(75.0% 对 76.0%;RR:0.99 [0.94, 1.04];P=0.6067)或平均口服阿片类药物处方数(11.5 对 11.8;P=0.7040)也无明显差异:结论:与匹配的非骨质疏松症对照组相比,骨质疏松症与成人 ACDF 术后四年内再次手术风险的增加无统计学意义或临床意义。此外,骨质疏松症与 ACDF 后发生假关节或口服阿片类药物的显著或有意义的风险无关,但还需要更多的研究来证实。还需要进行更多的研究,以明确骨质疏松症患者与无骨质疏松症患者相比,在 ACDF 术后的疼痛和功能方面是否存在有意义的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Osteoporosis is not associated with reoperation or pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion through 4-years' follow-up: a retrospective cohort study of US academic health centers.

Background context: Osteoporosis has been proposed as a risk factor for reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet this potential association has been understudied, with conflicting results to date.

Purpose: This study examines the hypothesis that adults with osteoporosis would have an increased risk of reoperation after ACDF compared to matched adults without osteoporosis.

Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study.

Patient sample: Two matched cohorts (mean age: 62 years; 75% female), each with 1,019 patients, who underwent primary ACDF. Cohorts were determined by the presence or absence of a diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Outcome measures: Incidence of reoperation occurring over 4 years postoperatively, with our primary outcome being the risk ratio (RR) of reoperation with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included risk and mean count of oral opioid prescriptions and risk of pseudoarthrosis.

Methods: We utilized the TriNetX network to identify adults undergoing their first ACDF from 2004 to 2020, excluding those with serious pathology, and divided patients into 2 cohorts: osteoporosis and nonosteoporosis. Patients were propensity matched according to key risk factors for reoperation.

Results: Patients with osteoporosis had no statistically significant or meaningful difference in risk of reoperation compared to nonosteoporotic patients over 4-years' follow-up [95% CI] (17.3% vs. 16.5%; RR: 1.05 [0.86, 1.27]; p=.6361). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the risk of pseudoarthrosis (26.5% vs. 29.1%; RR: 0.91 [0.79, 1.05]; p=.1820), oral opioid prescription (75.0% vs. 76.0%; RR: 0.99 [0.94, 1.04]; p=.6067), or mean oral opioid prescription count (11.5 vs. 11.8; p=.7040).

Conclusion: Compared to matched nonosteoporosis controls, osteoporosis was not associated with a statistically significant or clinically meaningful increase in risk of reoperation in adults over 4 years after ACDF. Furthermore, osteoporosis was not associated with a significant or meaningful risk of pseudoarthrosis or oral opioid prescription after ACDF, although more research is needed for corroboration. Additional research is needed to clarify whether those with osteoporosis have meaningful differences in pain and function compared to those without osteoporosis following ACDF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Frailty and Malnutrition as Predictors of Major Complications Following Posterior Thoracolumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Back Pain in Patients with Macromastia: What a Spine Surgeon Should Know. Glycemic Laboratory Values Are Associated With Increased Length of Stay and 90-Day Revision Risk Following Surgical Management of Adult Spinal Deformity. Is it safe to treat osteoporotic burst thoracolumbar fracture using percutaneous vertebroplasty? A minimum of five-year follow-up study. Low pelvic incidence as a risk factor for vertebral recollapse after percutaneous vertebroplasty in the thoracolumbar region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1