一家公立和私立医院的功能性癫痫发作符号学和分类。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2024.09.020
Gabriele Vilyte , James Butler , Victoria Ives-Deliperi , Chrisma Pretorius
{"title":"一家公立和私立医院的功能性癫痫发作符号学和分类。","authors":"Gabriele Vilyte ,&nbsp;James Butler ,&nbsp;Victoria Ives-Deliperi ,&nbsp;Chrisma Pretorius","doi":"10.1016/j.seizure.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Our understanding of potential differences in seizure semiology among patients with functional seizures (FS), also known as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), across socioeconomic contexts is currently limited. By examining the differences in seizure manifestations between different socioeconomic groups, we aim to enhance the understanding of how socioeconomic factors may influence FS presentation. This study aimed to describe FS semiology in patients from a private and public epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in Cape Town, South Africa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included patients with FS confirmed through video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) and without comorbid epilepsy. For this retrospective case-control study, data on seizure semiology was gathered from digital patient records, beginning with the earliest available record for each hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 305 patients from a private hospital and 67 patients from a public hospital were eligible for the study (<em>N</em> = 372). The private hospital tended to report more akinetic and subjective seizure types when compared to the public hospital. Additionally, patients at the public hospital had higher odds of reporting emotional seizure triggers (aOR=2.57, 95% CI [1.03, 6.37]), loss of consciousness or awareness (aOR=2.58, 95% CI [1.07, 6.24]), and rapid post-event recovery (aOR=6.01, 95% CI [2.52, 14.34]). At the same time, they were less likely to report both short (&lt;30 s) (aOR=0.21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.55]) and long (&gt;5 min) seizures (aOR=0.73, 95% CI [0.13, 0.56]), amnesia for the event (aOR=0.19, 95% CI [0.09, 0.43]), ictal aphasia (aOR=0.33, 95% CI [0.14, 0.76]) or falls and drop attacks (aOR=0.43, 95% CI [0.18, 0.996]), when compared to the private hospital patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the seizure manifestations were largely consistent across the two socioeconomic cohorts of patients with FS, some subtle differences were observed and warrant further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49552,"journal":{"name":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","volume":"122 ","pages":"Pages 71-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional seizure semiology and classification in a public and private hospital\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Vilyte ,&nbsp;James Butler ,&nbsp;Victoria Ives-Deliperi ,&nbsp;Chrisma Pretorius\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seizure.2024.09.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Our understanding of potential differences in seizure semiology among patients with functional seizures (FS), also known as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), across socioeconomic contexts is currently limited. By examining the differences in seizure manifestations between different socioeconomic groups, we aim to enhance the understanding of how socioeconomic factors may influence FS presentation. This study aimed to describe FS semiology in patients from a private and public epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in Cape Town, South Africa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included patients with FS confirmed through video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) and without comorbid epilepsy. For this retrospective case-control study, data on seizure semiology was gathered from digital patient records, beginning with the earliest available record for each hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 305 patients from a private hospital and 67 patients from a public hospital were eligible for the study (<em>N</em> = 372). The private hospital tended to report more akinetic and subjective seizure types when compared to the public hospital. Additionally, patients at the public hospital had higher odds of reporting emotional seizure triggers (aOR=2.57, 95% CI [1.03, 6.37]), loss of consciousness or awareness (aOR=2.58, 95% CI [1.07, 6.24]), and rapid post-event recovery (aOR=6.01, 95% CI [2.52, 14.34]). At the same time, they were less likely to report both short (&lt;30 s) (aOR=0.21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.55]) and long (&gt;5 min) seizures (aOR=0.73, 95% CI [0.13, 0.56]), amnesia for the event (aOR=0.19, 95% CI [0.09, 0.43]), ictal aphasia (aOR=0.33, 95% CI [0.14, 0.76]) or falls and drop attacks (aOR=0.43, 95% CI [0.18, 0.996]), when compared to the private hospital patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the seizure manifestations were largely consistent across the two socioeconomic cohorts of patients with FS, some subtle differences were observed and warrant further investigation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 71-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131124002681\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131124002681","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前,我们对不同社会经济背景下功能性癫痫发作(FS)(又称精神性非癫痫发作(PNES))患者癫痫发作半身像的潜在差异了解有限。通过研究不同社会经济群体间癫痫发作表现的差异,我们旨在加深对社会经济因素如何影响 FS 表现的理解。本研究旨在描述南非开普敦私立和公立癫痫监测机构(EMU)患者的FS半身像:研究对象包括通过视频脑电图(video-EEG)确诊的FS患者,且无合并癫痫。在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,有关癫痫发作半身像的数据来自数字化病历,从每家医院最早的病历开始收集:共有 305 名来自私立医院的患者和 67 名来自公立医院的患者符合研究条件(N = 372)。与公立医院相比,私立医院倾向于报告更多的运动性和主观性癫痫发作类型。此外,公立医院的患者报告情绪性发作诱因(aOR=2.57,95% CI [1.03,6.37])、意识或知觉丧失(aOR=2.58,95% CI [1.07,6.24])和事件后快速恢复(aOR=6.01,95% CI [2.52,14.34])的几率更高。与此同时,与私立医院患者相比,他们较少报告癫痫发作时间短(5 分钟)(aOR=0.73,95% CI [0.13,0.56])、对事件失忆(aOR=0.19,95% CI [0.09,0.43])、发作性失语(aOR=0.33,95% CI [0.14,0.76])或跌倒和跌伤(aOR=0.43,95% CI [0.18,0.996]):虽然两个社会经济组群的 FS 患者的癫痫发作表现基本一致,但也观察到一些微妙的差异,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Functional seizure semiology and classification in a public and private hospital

Purpose

Our understanding of potential differences in seizure semiology among patients with functional seizures (FS), also known as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), across socioeconomic contexts is currently limited. By examining the differences in seizure manifestations between different socioeconomic groups, we aim to enhance the understanding of how socioeconomic factors may influence FS presentation. This study aimed to describe FS semiology in patients from a private and public epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in Cape Town, South Africa.

Methods

The study included patients with FS confirmed through video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) and without comorbid epilepsy. For this retrospective case-control study, data on seizure semiology was gathered from digital patient records, beginning with the earliest available record for each hospital.

Results

A total of 305 patients from a private hospital and 67 patients from a public hospital were eligible for the study (N = 372). The private hospital tended to report more akinetic and subjective seizure types when compared to the public hospital. Additionally, patients at the public hospital had higher odds of reporting emotional seizure triggers (aOR=2.57, 95% CI [1.03, 6.37]), loss of consciousness or awareness (aOR=2.58, 95% CI [1.07, 6.24]), and rapid post-event recovery (aOR=6.01, 95% CI [2.52, 14.34]). At the same time, they were less likely to report both short (<30 s) (aOR=0.21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.55]) and long (>5 min) seizures (aOR=0.73, 95% CI [0.13, 0.56]), amnesia for the event (aOR=0.19, 95% CI [0.09, 0.43]), ictal aphasia (aOR=0.33, 95% CI [0.14, 0.76]) or falls and drop attacks (aOR=0.43, 95% CI [0.18, 0.996]), when compared to the private hospital patients.

Conclusion

While the seizure manifestations were largely consistent across the two socioeconomic cohorts of patients with FS, some subtle differences were observed and warrant further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
231
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Seizure - European Journal of Epilepsy is an international journal owned by Epilepsy Action (the largest member led epilepsy organisation in the UK). It provides a forum for papers on all topics related to epilepsy and seizure disorders.
期刊最新文献
Pregnancy planning in women with epilepsy: A single center observational study with focus on epilepsy type Parent-Reported mental health in nearest age siblings of children with Dravet Syndrome in Sweden Visual acuity in the context of retinal neuroaxonal loss in people with epilepsy Ictal tachycardia in children with epilepsy Safety profile of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed for renal disease surveillance in tuberous sclerosis complex patients with vagus nerve stimulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1