反向全肩关节成形术中的肱骨远端分离:生物机器人肩关节模拟器研究。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.055
Jared L Zitnay, Madelyn R Stout, Brittany Percin, Robert Z Tashjian, Peter N Chalmers, Christopher D Joyce, Gilles Walch, Heath B Henninger
{"title":"反向全肩关节成形术中的肱骨远端分离:生物机器人肩关节模拟器研究。","authors":"Jared L Zitnay, Madelyn R Stout, Brittany Percin, Robert Z Tashjian, Peter N Chalmers, Christopher D Joyce, Gilles Walch, Heath B Henninger","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Humeral distalization is inherent to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and is often produced with concomitant humeral lateralization via the level of the humeral head cut, implant positioning, implant neck shaft angle, and polymer insert thickness. Biomechanical data on the isolated effects of humeral distalization remain limited but could be important to consider when optimizing postoperative rTSA shoulder function. This study investigated the effects of isolated humeral distalization on shoulder biomechanics using a biorobotic shoulder simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using custom polymer inserts that translated the bearing surface 0, +5, +10, and +15 mm along the humeral stem axis, producing isolated distalization without lateralization. Specimens underwent passive elevation in the scapular plane with a static scapula to assess glenohumeral range of motion. Scapular plane abduction motion trajectories were then performed, driven by previously collected scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics from rTSA patients. The effect of isolated distalization on passive elevation was tested using mixed-effects linear regression and the effect on muscle force, joint reaction force, and muscle excursion during active scapular-plane abduction was tested using statistical parametric mapping random effects analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum passive scapular plane elevation increased with humeral distalization (4° per 5 mm distalization). During active elevation, deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces, and joint reaction forces, increased up to 37% per 5 mm of distalization. Simulated deltoid muscle excursion was altered with increasing distalization but amounted to no more than 0.8 mm change from baseline per 5 mm of distalization. Rotator cuff muscles were consistently lengthened throughout abduction, up to 1.6 mm per 5 mm of distalization. These trends were observed across various patient motions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isolated humeral distalization caused dramatic increases in the muscle forces required to perform scapular-plane abduction. Joint reaction forces increased correspondingly. These results suggest that implant and surgical strategies to generate deltoid muscle tension without humeral distalization may promote better active range of motion and more durable long-term outcomes over approaches that rely on distalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolated humeral distalization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biorobotic shoulder simulator study.\",\"authors\":\"Jared L Zitnay, Madelyn R Stout, Brittany Percin, Robert Z Tashjian, Peter N Chalmers, Christopher D Joyce, Gilles Walch, Heath B Henninger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Humeral distalization is inherent to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and is often produced with concomitant humeral lateralization via the level of the humeral head cut, implant positioning, implant neck shaft angle, and polymer insert thickness. Biomechanical data on the isolated effects of humeral distalization remain limited but could be important to consider when optimizing postoperative rTSA shoulder function. This study investigated the effects of isolated humeral distalization on shoulder biomechanics using a biorobotic shoulder simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using custom polymer inserts that translated the bearing surface 0, +5, +10, and +15 mm along the humeral stem axis, producing isolated distalization without lateralization. Specimens underwent passive elevation in the scapular plane with a static scapula to assess glenohumeral range of motion. Scapular plane abduction motion trajectories were then performed, driven by previously collected scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics from rTSA patients. The effect of isolated distalization on passive elevation was tested using mixed-effects linear regression and the effect on muscle force, joint reaction force, and muscle excursion during active scapular-plane abduction was tested using statistical parametric mapping random effects analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum passive scapular plane elevation increased with humeral distalization (4° per 5 mm distalization). During active elevation, deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces, and joint reaction forces, increased up to 37% per 5 mm of distalization. Simulated deltoid muscle excursion was altered with increasing distalization but amounted to no more than 0.8 mm change from baseline per 5 mm of distalization. Rotator cuff muscles were consistently lengthened throughout abduction, up to 1.6 mm per 5 mm of distalization. These trends were observed across various patient motions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isolated humeral distalization caused dramatic increases in the muscle forces required to perform scapular-plane abduction. Joint reaction forces increased correspondingly. These results suggest that implant and surgical strategies to generate deltoid muscle tension without humeral distalization may promote better active range of motion and more durable long-term outcomes over approaches that rely on distalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.055\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肱骨远端化是反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)的固有特点,通常会通过肱骨头切口水平、植入物定位、植入物颈轴角度和聚合物插入物厚度同时产生肱骨外侧化。有关肱骨远端化单独影响的生物力学数据仍然有限,但在优化 rTSA 术后肩关节功能时,这些数据可能是重要的考虑因素。本研究使用生物机器人肩关节模拟器研究了孤立肱骨远端化对肩关节生物力学的影响:方法:使用定制的聚合物插入物对8个新鲜冷冻的尸体肩部进行了测试,这些插入物将承重面沿肱骨干轴线移动了0、+5、+10和+15毫米,产生了孤立的远端化而没有侧移。标本在肩胛平面上进行静态肩胛被动抬高,以评估盂肱运动范围。然后,根据之前从rTSA患者身上收集的肩胛胸和盂肱运动学数据,进行肩胛平面外展运动轨迹分析。使用混合效应线性回归测试了孤立远端化对被动抬高的影响,并使用统计参数映射随机效应分析测试了主动肩胛平面外展时对肌肉力量、关节反作用力和肌肉偏移的影响:最大被动肩胛平面抬高随着肱骨远端化而增加(每5 mm远端化增加4°)。在主动抬高过程中,三角肌和肩袖肌力以及关节反作用力每远端化5毫米最多增加37%。随着远端化程度的增加,模拟三角肌偏移量也会发生变化,但每 5 毫米远端化与基线相比的变化不超过 0.8 毫米。肩袖肌肉在整个外展过程中持续延长,每 5 mm 的远端化可达到 1.6 mm。这些趋势在患者的各种运动中均可观察到:结论:孤立的肱骨远端化导致肩胛平面外展所需的肌肉力量急剧增加。关节反作用力也相应增加。这些结果表明,与依赖肱骨远端化的方法相比,在不进行肱骨远端化的情况下产生三角肌张力的植入和手术策略可能会促进更好的主动运动范围和更持久的长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Isolated humeral distalization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biorobotic shoulder simulator study.

Background: Humeral distalization is inherent to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and is often produced with concomitant humeral lateralization via the level of the humeral head cut, implant positioning, implant neck shaft angle, and polymer insert thickness. Biomechanical data on the isolated effects of humeral distalization remain limited but could be important to consider when optimizing postoperative rTSA shoulder function. This study investigated the effects of isolated humeral distalization on shoulder biomechanics using a biorobotic shoulder simulator.

Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using custom polymer inserts that translated the bearing surface 0, +5, +10, and +15 mm along the humeral stem axis, producing isolated distalization without lateralization. Specimens underwent passive elevation in the scapular plane with a static scapula to assess glenohumeral range of motion. Scapular plane abduction motion trajectories were then performed, driven by previously collected scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics from rTSA patients. The effect of isolated distalization on passive elevation was tested using mixed-effects linear regression and the effect on muscle force, joint reaction force, and muscle excursion during active scapular-plane abduction was tested using statistical parametric mapping random effects analysis.

Results: Maximum passive scapular plane elevation increased with humeral distalization (4° per 5 mm distalization). During active elevation, deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces, and joint reaction forces, increased up to 37% per 5 mm of distalization. Simulated deltoid muscle excursion was altered with increasing distalization but amounted to no more than 0.8 mm change from baseline per 5 mm of distalization. Rotator cuff muscles were consistently lengthened throughout abduction, up to 1.6 mm per 5 mm of distalization. These trends were observed across various patient motions.

Conclusions: Isolated humeral distalization caused dramatic increases in the muscle forces required to perform scapular-plane abduction. Joint reaction forces increased correspondingly. These results suggest that implant and surgical strategies to generate deltoid muscle tension without humeral distalization may promote better active range of motion and more durable long-term outcomes over approaches that rely on distalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Comparable low revision rates of stemmed and stemless total anatomic shoulder arthroplasties after exclusion of metal-backed glenoid components: a collaboration between the Australian and Danish national shoulder arthroplasty registries. Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study. Glenoid track revisited. Management of the failed Latarjet procedure. Comparison of 3D computer-assisted planning with and without patient-specific instrumentation for severe bone defects in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1