Tsung-Chieh Yao, Jing-Long Huang, Chi-Shin Wu, Henry Horng-Shing Lu, Yen-Chen Chang, Wei-Yu Chen, Hui-Fang Kao, Ann Chen Wu, Hui-Ju Tsai
{"title":"白三烯受体拮抗剂与吸入性皮质类固醇相关神经精神不良事件的风险比较。","authors":"Tsung-Chieh Yao, Jing-Long Huang, Chi-Shin Wu, Henry Horng-Shing Lu, Yen-Chen Chang, Wei-Yu Chen, Hui-Fang Kao, Ann Chen Wu, Hui-Ju Tsai","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leukotriene-receptor antagonists (LTRA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are common controller medications for asthma, but limited studies examine their comparative risks on neuropsychiatric adverse events (NAEs) in patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the comparative risks of LTRA versus ICS on 7 distinct categories of NAEs in patients with asthma at a nationwide level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cohort study during 2010-2021. Incident NAEs and their clinical subgroups (eg, psychotic disorders, anxiety disorders, movement disorders, behavioral and emotional disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders) were assessed. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to quantify the comparative risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,249,897 patients with asthma aged 6 to 64 years. Incidence rates for NAEs were 25.10 per 1000 person-years among patients treated with LTRA and 23.46 per 1000 person-years among those treated with ICS. The incidence rate difference was 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-2.98) per 1000 person-years. Positive associations of NAEs and 3 clinical subgroups were found in patients treated with LTRA compared with ICS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.06 [95% CI: 1.00-1.12] for NAEs; HR: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.24-2.84] for psychotic disorders; HR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.01-1.20] for anxiety disorders; and HR: 1.27 [95% CI: 1.02-1.58] for behavioral and emotional disorders), but not for movement disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide cohort study identified heightened risks, ranging from 6% to 88%, of NAEs and 3 clinical subgroups in patients with asthma treated with LTRA compared with ICS. These findings underscore the necessity for clinicians to communicate with patients regarding potential neuropsychiatric harms when prescribing LTRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Risk of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Associated With Leukotriene-Receptor Antagonists Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids.\",\"authors\":\"Tsung-Chieh Yao, Jing-Long Huang, Chi-Shin Wu, Henry Horng-Shing Lu, Yen-Chen Chang, Wei-Yu Chen, Hui-Fang Kao, Ann Chen Wu, Hui-Ju Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leukotriene-receptor antagonists (LTRA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are common controller medications for asthma, but limited studies examine their comparative risks on neuropsychiatric adverse events (NAEs) in patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the comparative risks of LTRA versus ICS on 7 distinct categories of NAEs in patients with asthma at a nationwide level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cohort study during 2010-2021. Incident NAEs and their clinical subgroups (eg, psychotic disorders, anxiety disorders, movement disorders, behavioral and emotional disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders) were assessed. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to quantify the comparative risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,249,897 patients with asthma aged 6 to 64 years. Incidence rates for NAEs were 25.10 per 1000 person-years among patients treated with LTRA and 23.46 per 1000 person-years among those treated with ICS. The incidence rate difference was 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-2.98) per 1000 person-years. Positive associations of NAEs and 3 clinical subgroups were found in patients treated with LTRA compared with ICS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.06 [95% CI: 1.00-1.12] for NAEs; HR: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.24-2.84] for psychotic disorders; HR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.01-1.20] for anxiety disorders; and HR: 1.27 [95% CI: 1.02-1.58] for behavioral and emotional disorders), but not for movement disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide cohort study identified heightened risks, ranging from 6% to 88%, of NAEs and 3 clinical subgroups in patients with asthma treated with LTRA compared with ICS. These findings underscore the necessity for clinicians to communicate with patients regarding potential neuropsychiatric harms when prescribing LTRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Risk of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Associated With Leukotriene-Receptor Antagonists Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids.
Background: Leukotriene-receptor antagonists (LTRA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are common controller medications for asthma, but limited studies examine their comparative risks on neuropsychiatric adverse events (NAEs) in patients with asthma.
Objective: To investigate the comparative risks of LTRA versus ICS on 7 distinct categories of NAEs in patients with asthma at a nationwide level.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study during 2010-2021. Incident NAEs and their clinical subgroups (eg, psychotic disorders, anxiety disorders, movement disorders, behavioral and emotional disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders) were assessed. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to quantify the comparative risks.
Results: There were 1,249,897 patients with asthma aged 6 to 64 years. Incidence rates for NAEs were 25.10 per 1000 person-years among patients treated with LTRA and 23.46 per 1000 person-years among those treated with ICS. The incidence rate difference was 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-2.98) per 1000 person-years. Positive associations of NAEs and 3 clinical subgroups were found in patients treated with LTRA compared with ICS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.06 [95% CI: 1.00-1.12] for NAEs; HR: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.24-2.84] for psychotic disorders; HR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.01-1.20] for anxiety disorders; and HR: 1.27 [95% CI: 1.02-1.58] for behavioral and emotional disorders), but not for movement disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders.
Conclusions: This nationwide cohort study identified heightened risks, ranging from 6% to 88%, of NAEs and 3 clinical subgroups in patients with asthma treated with LTRA compared with ICS. These findings underscore the necessity for clinicians to communicate with patients regarding potential neuropsychiatric harms when prescribing LTRA.
期刊介绍：
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
