认知诊断诊所就诊者的双任务行走与认知障碍之间的关联。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Australasian Journal on Ageing Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1111/ajag.13372
Michele L Callisaya, Olivier Piguet, Melinda Munroe, Rodrigo C De Araújo, Bridget O'Bree, Velandai K Srikanth
{"title":"认知诊断诊所就诊者的双任务行走与认知障碍之间的关联。","authors":"Michele L Callisaya, Olivier Piguet, Melinda Munroe, Rodrigo C De Araújo, Bridget O'Bree, Velandai K Srikanth","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dual-task walking performance is an early marker of dementia. However, there is uncertainty about which measure of the dual-task test is a better marker. The objective of this study was to determine which dual-task measure best differentiates between normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 116) were aged ≥60 years attending a cognitive clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Single- and dual-task gait speed were obtained using a 16 metre distance and stopwatch. The cognitive task involved reciting alternate letters of the alphabet sitting and walking. Dual-task interference in gait and cognition was calculated as: single-task-dual-task/single task × 100 and summed to obtain total interference. Multiple linear regression was used to determine differences in single and dual-task measures between those with no cognitive impairment (n = 11), MCI (n = 54) and dementia (n = 51).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the sample was 76.9 (SD 6.4) years and 48.3% (n = 56) were female. Compared to those with dementia: (a) those with MCI had a higher dual-task letter rate and lower cognitive and total interference (all indicate better performance) (p < .05) and (b) those with no cognitive impairment had a higher single- and dual-task letter rate (both indicate better performance) (p < .05). There were no differences between those with no cognitive impairment and those with MCI (all p > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a cognitive clinic, measurement during dual-task walking differentiated those with dementia from those with MCI or no cognitive impairment. However, differences appear to be driven by performance on the cognitive, rather than the gait task.</p>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between dual-task walking and cognitive impairment in people attending a cognitive diagnostic clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Michele L Callisaya, Olivier Piguet, Melinda Munroe, Rodrigo C De Araújo, Bridget O'Bree, Velandai K Srikanth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajag.13372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dual-task walking performance is an early marker of dementia. However, there is uncertainty about which measure of the dual-task test is a better marker. The objective of this study was to determine which dual-task measure best differentiates between normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 116) were aged ≥60 years attending a cognitive clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Single- and dual-task gait speed were obtained using a 16 metre distance and stopwatch. The cognitive task involved reciting alternate letters of the alphabet sitting and walking. Dual-task interference in gait and cognition was calculated as: single-task-dual-task/single task × 100 and summed to obtain total interference. Multiple linear regression was used to determine differences in single and dual-task measures between those with no cognitive impairment (n = 11), MCI (n = 54) and dementia (n = 51).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the sample was 76.9 (SD 6.4) years and 48.3% (n = 56) were female. Compared to those with dementia: (a) those with MCI had a higher dual-task letter rate and lower cognitive and total interference (all indicate better performance) (p < .05) and (b) those with no cognitive impairment had a higher single- and dual-task letter rate (both indicate better performance) (p < .05). There were no differences between those with no cognitive impairment and those with MCI (all p > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a cognitive clinic, measurement during dual-task walking differentiated those with dementia from those with MCI or no cognitive impairment. However, differences appear to be driven by performance on the cognitive, rather than the gait task.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal on Ageing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal on Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双任务步行表现是痴呆症的早期标志。然而,目前还不确定哪种双任务测试方法是更好的标志。本研究旨在确定哪种双任务测试方法最能区分正常认知、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆:参与者(n = 116)年龄≥60 岁,在澳大利亚墨尔本的一家认知诊所就诊。使用 16 米距离和秒表测量单任务和双任务步速。认知任务包括坐着和步行交替背诵字母表中的字母。步态和认知的双任务干扰计算公式为:单任务-双任务/单任务 × 100,相加得出总干扰。采用多元线性回归法确定无认知障碍(n = 11)、MCI(n = 54)和痴呆(n = 51)患者在单任务和双任务测量方面的差异:样本的平均年龄为 76.9 (SD 6.4)岁,48.3%(n = 56)为女性。与痴呆症患者相比:(a) MCI 患者的双任务字母率较高,认知干扰和总干扰较低(均表示表现较好)(P .05):结论:在认知诊所中,双任务行走时的测量结果可将痴呆症患者与 MCI 患者或无认知障碍者区分开来。然而,差异似乎是由认知任务的表现而非步态任务的表现造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between dual-task walking and cognitive impairment in people attending a cognitive diagnostic clinic.

Objectives: Dual-task walking performance is an early marker of dementia. However, there is uncertainty about which measure of the dual-task test is a better marker. The objective of this study was to determine which dual-task measure best differentiates between normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.

Methods: Participants (n = 116) were aged ≥60 years attending a cognitive clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Single- and dual-task gait speed were obtained using a 16 metre distance and stopwatch. The cognitive task involved reciting alternate letters of the alphabet sitting and walking. Dual-task interference in gait and cognition was calculated as: single-task-dual-task/single task × 100 and summed to obtain total interference. Multiple linear regression was used to determine differences in single and dual-task measures between those with no cognitive impairment (n = 11), MCI (n = 54) and dementia (n = 51).

Results: The mean age of the sample was 76.9 (SD 6.4) years and 48.3% (n = 56) were female. Compared to those with dementia: (a) those with MCI had a higher dual-task letter rate and lower cognitive and total interference (all indicate better performance) (p < .05) and (b) those with no cognitive impairment had a higher single- and dual-task letter rate (both indicate better performance) (p < .05). There were no differences between those with no cognitive impairment and those with MCI (all p > .05).

Conclusions: In a cognitive clinic, measurement during dual-task walking differentiated those with dementia from those with MCI or no cognitive impairment. However, differences appear to be driven by performance on the cognitive, rather than the gait task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Prescribing patterns in people living with dementia in the community: A cross-sectional study. The prevalence of falls and associated factors in older adults of the Torres Strait. Engaging under-represented oldest old in research: An approach for inclusive recruitment. Frailty in general medicine patients receiving geriatric medicine liaison services is predictive of adverse outcomes. Associations between dual-task walking and cognitive impairment in people attending a cognitive diagnostic clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1