医疗保健领域的人工智能民主化:社区驱动的伦理解决方案。

Future healthcare journal Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100165
Ceilidh Welsh, Susana Román García, Gillian C Barnett, Raj Jena
{"title":"医疗保健领域的人工智能民主化:社区驱动的伦理解决方案。","authors":"Ceilidh Welsh, Susana Román García, Gillian C Barnett, Raj Jena","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of possibilities in healthcare, ranging from clinical task automation to disease detection. AI algorithms have the potential to analyse medical data, enhance diagnostic accuracy, personalise treatment plans and predict patient outcomes among other possibilities. With a surge in AI's popularity, its developments are outpacing policy and regulatory frameworks, leading to concerns about ethical considerations and collaborative development. Healthcare faces its own ethical challenges, including biased datasets, under-representation and inequitable access to resources, all contributing to mistrust in medical systems. To address these issues in the context of AI healthcare solutions and prevent perpetuating existing inequities, it is crucial to involve communities and stakeholders in the AI lifecycle. This article discusses four community-driven approaches for co-developing ethical AI healthcare solutions, including understanding and prioritising needs, defining a shared language, promoting mutual learning and co-creation, and democratising AI. These approaches emphasise bottom-up decision-making to reflect and centre impacted communities' needs and values. These collaborative approaches provide actionable considerations for creating equitable AI solutions in healthcare, fostering a more just and effective healthcare system that serves patient and community needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democratising artificial intelligence in healthcare: community-driven approaches for ethical solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Ceilidh Welsh, Susana Román García, Gillian C Barnett, Raj Jena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of possibilities in healthcare, ranging from clinical task automation to disease detection. AI algorithms have the potential to analyse medical data, enhance diagnostic accuracy, personalise treatment plans and predict patient outcomes among other possibilities. With a surge in AI's popularity, its developments are outpacing policy and regulatory frameworks, leading to concerns about ethical considerations and collaborative development. Healthcare faces its own ethical challenges, including biased datasets, under-representation and inequitable access to resources, all contributing to mistrust in medical systems. To address these issues in the context of AI healthcare solutions and prevent perpetuating existing inequities, it is crucial to involve communities and stakeholders in the AI lifecycle. This article discusses four community-driven approaches for co-developing ethical AI healthcare solutions, including understanding and prioritising needs, defining a shared language, promoting mutual learning and co-creation, and democratising AI. These approaches emphasise bottom-up decision-making to reflect and centre impacted communities' needs and values. These collaborative approaches provide actionable considerations for creating equitable AI solutions in healthcare, fostering a more just and effective healthcare system that serves patient and community needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future healthcare journal\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"100165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452836/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future healthcare journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)的快速发展和广泛应用为医疗保健领域带来了新的可能性,从临床任务自动化到疾病检测,无所不包。人工智能算法具有分析医疗数据、提高诊断准确性、个性化治疗方案和预测患者预后等潜力。随着人工智能的普及,其发展速度超过了政策和监管框架,引发了人们对伦理因素和合作发展的担忧。医疗保健面临着自身的伦理挑战,包括数据集存在偏见、代表性不足和资源获取不公平,所有这些都导致了人们对医疗系统的不信任。为了在人工智能医疗解决方案中解决这些问题,并防止现有的不平等现象长期存在,让社区和利益相关者参与人工智能生命周期至关重要。本文讨论了共同开发合乎伦理的人工智能医疗解决方案的四种社区驱动方法,包括了解需求并确定优先次序、定义共同语言、促进相互学习和共同创造以及实现人工智能民主化。这些方法强调自下而上的决策,以反映和集中受影响社区的需求和价值观。这些合作方法为在医疗保健领域创建公平的人工智能解决方案提供了可操作的考虑因素,促进建立一个更加公正、有效的医疗保健系统,以满足患者和社区的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Democratising artificial intelligence in healthcare: community-driven approaches for ethical solutions.

The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of possibilities in healthcare, ranging from clinical task automation to disease detection. AI algorithms have the potential to analyse medical data, enhance diagnostic accuracy, personalise treatment plans and predict patient outcomes among other possibilities. With a surge in AI's popularity, its developments are outpacing policy and regulatory frameworks, leading to concerns about ethical considerations and collaborative development. Healthcare faces its own ethical challenges, including biased datasets, under-representation and inequitable access to resources, all contributing to mistrust in medical systems. To address these issues in the context of AI healthcare solutions and prevent perpetuating existing inequities, it is crucial to involve communities and stakeholders in the AI lifecycle. This article discusses four community-driven approaches for co-developing ethical AI healthcare solutions, including understanding and prioritising needs, defining a shared language, promoting mutual learning and co-creation, and democratising AI. These approaches emphasise bottom-up decision-making to reflect and centre impacted communities' needs and values. These collaborative approaches provide actionable considerations for creating equitable AI solutions in healthcare, fostering a more just and effective healthcare system that serves patient and community needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'There is no 'I' in team but there may be a PA' [Future Healthcare Journal volume 6 (October 2019) 177-180]. Hospital at Home - an emerging opportunity for internal medicine trainees. Physician associate preceptorship: Experience of a novel programme in Inverness. Why the NHS needs adult generalists: A call for single certification in general internal medicine. Sharpening the double-edged sword: Revisiting the evolving role of social media within medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1